PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
This promise never materialized. And unlikely will.
We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.
Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.
Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are
not.
The changes are pretty straight-forward:
- <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
- page_cache_get() -> get_page();
- page_cache_release() -> put_page();
This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.
The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.
virtual patch
@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK
@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This patch is a result of a filter applied to the lnet selftest
code to remove the last bits of hidden white spaces.
Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Remove any extra spacing for the lines of code setting variables to
some value.
Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Remove any extra spacing such as "int rc" to "int rc" to match
the proper kernel style
Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Remove any extra spacing as reported by checkpatch.
Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
No reason to have returns at end of void function.
Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Doing if (rc != 0) or if (rc == 0) is bad form. This patch corrects
the LNet code to behavior according to kernel coding standards.
Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This removes every instance of checking a variable against
NULL in the LNet source code.
Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Remove any useless blank lines reported by checkpatch.pl
for LNet layer.
Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
In several places in the LNet core the code doesn't align
up properly. This resolves those checkpath issues.
Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
In several places in the LNet core comment blocks don't follow the
linux kernel style. This patch cleans those problems up.
Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Update copyright messages in files modified by Intel employees
in 2015 by non-trivial patches. Exclude patches that are only
deleting code, renaming functions, or adding or removing whitespace.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-7243
Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/16758
Reviewed-by: James Nunez <james.a.nunez@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: James Simmons <uja.ornl@yahoo.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Eremin <dmitry.eremin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The Linux kernel coding style guidelines suggest not using typedefs
for structure types. This patch gets rid of the typedef for
srpc_server_rpc_t.
Signed-off-by: Shraddha Barke <shraddha.6596@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The lustre selftest code has multiple time stamps that are kept
as 'time_t' or 'unsigned long' and can therefore overflow on
32-bit systems.
This changes the code to use time64_t instead.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Unify spacing in variable declarations, and align indentation in headers.
General whitespace cleanups.
Signed-off-by: Mike Shuey <shuey@purdue.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The following patch makes a function static as it is not used by other
files.
The patch fixes the warning:
WARNING: symbol 'brw_server_handle' was not declared. Should it be static?
The above warning was reported by sparse.
Signed-off-by: Heena Sirwani <heenasirwani@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The following patch makes a function static as it is not used by other
files.
The patch fixes the warning:
WARNING: symbol 'brw_bulk_ready' was not declared. Should it be static?
The above warning was reported by sparse.
Signed-off-by: Heena Sirwani <heenasirwani@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The following patch makes a function static as it is not used by other
files.
The patch fixes the warning:
WARNING: symbol 'brw_server_rpc_done' was not declared. Should it be static?
The above warning was reported by sparse.
Signed-off-by: Heena Sirwani <heenasirwani@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The following patch makes a function static as it is not used by other
files.
The patch fixes the warning:
WARNING: symbol 'brw_check_bulk' was not declared. Should it be static?
The above warning was reported by sparse.
Signed-off-by: Heena Sirwani <heenasirwani@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The following patch makes a function static as it was not used by other
files.
The patch fixes the warning:
WARNING: symbol 'brw_fill_bulk' was not declared. Should it be
static?
The above warning was reported by sparse.
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The following patch makes a function static as it was not used by other
files.
The patch fixes the warning:
WARNING: symbol 'brw_check_page' was not declared. Should it be static?
The above warning was reported by sparse.
Signed-off-by: Heena Sirwani <heenasirwani@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The following patch makes a function static as it was not used by other
files.
The patch fixes the warning:
WARNING: symbol 'brw_fill_page' was not declared. Should it be static?
The above warning was reported by sparse.
Signed-off-by: Heena Sirwani <heenasirwani@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The following patch makes a function static as it is not used by other
files.
The patch fixes the following warning:
WARNING: symbol brw_inject_one_error was not declared. Should it be
static?
The above warning was reported by sparse.
Signed-off-by: Heena Sirwani <heenasirwani@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The following patch makes a function static as it was not used by other
files.
The patch fixes the following warning:
WARNING: symbol brw_client_init was not declared. Should it be static?
The above warning was reported by sparse.
Signed-off-by: Heena Sirwani <heenasirwani@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Just use the proper modifier type...
Cc: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Remove spaces between function names and open parentheses to
eliminate warnings generated by checkpatch.pl and meet kernel
coding standards.
Signed-off-by: Lisa Nguyen <lisa@xenapiadmin.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Kirill A. Shutemov