PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
This promise never materialized. And unlikely will.
We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.
Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.
Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are
not.
The changes are pretty straight-forward:
- <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
- page_cache_get() -> get_page();
- page_cache_release() -> put_page();
This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.
The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.
virtual patch
@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK
@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This fixes most of the
"Block comments use a trailing */ on a separate line" checkpatch
warnings, also some slight reformats of structures or comments
at places.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
All instances of "x == NULL" are changed to "!x" and
"x != NULL" to "x"
Also remove some redundant assertions.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Fixes checkpatch.pl CHECK:LINE_SPACING: Please don't use multiple blank
lines.
The patch is generated using checkpatch.pl --fix-inplace:
for f in $(find drivers/staging/lustre/ -type f) ; do
./scripts/checkpatch.pl --types "LINE_SPACING" --test-only=multiple \
--fix-inplace -f $f
done
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <mike.rapoport@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Move lustre/include/linux/lustre_intent.h to lustre/include.
Signed-off-by: John L. Hammond <john.hammond@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
In drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include there was a bunch of .h files
relying on ccflags to be set up right. Make all of them proper relative
paths so that ccflags for different subdirs can be now removed.
Cc: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Cc: hpdd-discuss <hpdd-discuss@lists.01.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
We need to remove the ccflags from the Lustre code as it prevents
individual object files from building properly in the kernel build
system. It also hids the horrid mess that the Lustre include files are
made up of.
Start out by removing the toplevel ccflags variable pointing to
drivers/staging/lustre/include/ as a valid include path. This requires
the absolute include markings of a bunch of .h and .c files, which is
also done here.
Cc: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Cc: hpdd-discuss <hpdd-discuss@lists.01.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
When allocating a reply buffer for the striping information don't
assume the unlikely worst case. Instead, assume the common case
and size the buffer based on the observed default ea/cookie size.
The default size is initialized to a single stripe and allowed to
grow up to an entire page if needed. This means that for smallish
filesystems (less than ~21 OSTs) where the worst case striping
information can fit in a single page there is effectively no
change. Only for larger filesystem will the default be less than
the maximum. This has a number of advantages.
* By limiting the default reply buffer size we avoid always
vmalloc()'ing the buffer because it exceeds four pages in size
and instead kmalloc() it. This prevents the client from
thrashing on the global vmalloc() spin lock.
* A reply buffer of exactly the right size (no larger) is allocated
in the overflow case. These larger reply buffers are still
unlikely to exceed the 16k limit where a vmalloc() will occur.
* Saves memory in the common case. Wide striped files exceeded
the default are expected to be the exception.
The reason this patch works is because the ptlrpc layer is smart
enough to reallocate the reply buffer when an overflow occurs.
Therefore the client doesn't have to drop the incoming reply and
send a new request with a larger reply buffer.
It's also worth mentioning that the reply buffer always contains
a significant amount of extra padding because they are rounded up
to the nearest power of two. This means that even files striped
wider than the default have a good chance of fitting in the
allocated reply buffer.
Also remove client eadatasize check in mdt xattr packing because
as said above client can handle -EOVERFLOW.
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Lai Siyao <lai.siyao@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/6339
Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3338
Reviewed-by: James Simmons <uja.ornl@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Bob Glossman <bob.glossman@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
In kernel 3.11 O_TMPFILE was introduced, but the open flag value
conflicts with the O_LOV_DELAY_CREATE flag 020000000 previously used
by Lustre-aware applications. O_LOV_DELAY_CREATE allows applications
to defer file layout and object creation from open time (the default)
until it can instead be specified by the application using an ioctl.
Instead of trying to find a non-conflicting O_LOV_DELAY_CREATE flag
or define a Lustre-specific flag that isn't of use to most/any other
filesystems, use (O_NOCTTY|FASYNC) as the new value. These flags
are not meaningful for newly-created regular files and should be
OK since O_LOV_DELAY_CREATE is only meaningful for new files.
I looked into using O_ACCMODE/FMODE_WRITE_IOCTL, which allows calling
ioctl() on the minimally-opened fd and is close to what is needed,
but that doesn't allow specifying the actual read or write mode for
the file, and fcntl(F_SETFL) doesn't allow O_RDONLY/O_WRONLY/O_RDWR
to be set after the file is opened.
Lustre-change: http://review.whamcloud.com/8312
Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-4209
Signed-off-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peng Tao <bergwolf@gmail.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
We need to include <linux/posix_acl_xattr.h> regardless of
CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL is set or not. Otherwise build fails as
reported by kbuild robot:
>> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/file.c:2965:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'posix_acl_dup' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
acl = posix_acl_dup(lli->lli_posix_acl);
<many similar errors omitted>
Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peng Tao <bergwolf@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
We have a kernel-wide function tracing system, so use that instead of
rolling a custom one just for one filesystem.
Cc: Peng Tao <tao.peng@emc.com>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
We have a kernel-wide function tracing system, so use that instead of
rolling a custom one just for one filesystem.
Cc: Peng Tao <tao.peng@emc.com>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
When a client issue an RPC to get a layout lock, it
must not hold rpc_lock because in case of a restore
the rpc can be blocking for a long time
Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3200
Lustre-change: http://review.whamcloud.com/6115
Signed-off-by: JC Lafoucriere <jacques-charles.lafoucriere@cea.fr>
Reviewed-by: Jinshan Xiong <jinshan.xiong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Johann Lombardi <johann.lombardi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peng Tao <tao.peng@emc.com>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Kirill A. Shutemov