Neither used nor correctly implemented anywhere. Just completely remove
the interface.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Acked-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/226645/
The device parameter is completely unused because it is available in the
attachment structure as well.
v2: fix kerneldoc as well
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/226643/
drm_irq.c contains both the irq helper library (optional) and the
vblank support (optional, but part of the modeset uapi, and doesn't
require the use of the irq helpers at all.
Split this up for more clarity of the scope of the individual bits.
v2: Move misplaced hunks to this patch (Stefan).
Cc: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170531092146.12528-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
We need a declaration of struct device to avoid warnings:
In file included from include/drm/drm_file.h:38:0,
from drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c:38:
include/drm/drm_prime.h:71:14: warning: 'struct device' declared inside
parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or
declaration
struct device *attach_dev);
^~~~~~
Forward declare it.
Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1494435925-9457-1-git-send-email-labbott@redhat.com
The existing drm_gem_prime_import function uses the underlying
struct device of a drm_device for attaching to a dma_buf. Some drivers
(notably vgem) may not have an underlying device structure. Offer
an alternate function to attach using any available device structure.
Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1493923548-20878-3-git-send-email-labbott@redhat.com
I'm torn on whether drm_minor really should be here or somewhere else.
Maybe with more clarity after untangling drmP.h more this is easier to
decide, for now I've put a FIXME comment right next to it. Right now
we need struct drm_minor for the inline drm_file type helpers, and so
it does kinda make sense to have them here.
Next patch will kerneldoc-ify the entire pile.
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170308141257.12119-10-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
Christian König