Before the relocation process of a block group starts, it sets the block
group to readonly mode, then flushes all delalloc writes and then finally
it waits for all ordered extents to complete. This last step includes
waiting for ordered extents destinated at extents allocated in other block
groups, making us waste unecessary time.
So improve this by waiting only for ordered extents that fall into the
block group's range.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
So that its better organized.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Cleanup.
kmem_cache_destroy has support NULL argument checking,
so drop the double null testing before calling it.
Signed-off-by: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We have a mechanism to make sure we don't lose updates for ordered extents that
were logged in the transaction that is currently running. We add the ordered
extent to a transaction list and then the transaction waits on all the ordered
extents in that list. However are substantially large file systems this list
can be extremely large, and can give us soft lockups, since the ordered extents
don't remove themselves from the list when they do complete.
To fix this we simply add a counter to the transaction that is incremented any
time we have a logged extent that needs to be completed in the current
transaction. Then when the ordered extent finally completes it decrements the
per transaction counter and wakes up the transaction if we are the last ones.
This will eliminate the softlockup. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
If we fail to submit a bio for a direct IO request, we were grabbing the
corresponding ordered extent and decrementing its reference count twice,
once for our lookup reference and once for the ordered tree reference.
This was a problem because it caused the ordered extent to be freed
without removing it from the ordered tree and any lists it might be
attached to, leaving dangling pointers to the ordered extent around.
Example trace with CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC=y:
[161779.858707] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 0000000087654330
[161779.859983] IP: [<ffffffff8124ca68>] rb_prev+0x22/0x3b
[161779.860636] PGD 34d818067 PUD 0
[161779.860636] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
(...)
[161779.860636] Call Trace:
[161779.860636] [<ffffffffa06b36a6>] __tree_search+0xd9/0xf9 [btrfs]
[161779.860636] [<ffffffffa06b3708>] tree_search+0x42/0x63 [btrfs]
[161779.860636] [<ffffffffa06b4868>] ? btrfs_lookup_ordered_range+0x2d/0xa5 [btrfs]
[161779.860636] [<ffffffffa06b4873>] btrfs_lookup_ordered_range+0x38/0xa5 [btrfs]
[161779.860636] [<ffffffffa06aab8e>] btrfs_get_blocks_direct+0x11b/0x615 [btrfs]
[161779.860636] [<ffffffff8119727f>] do_blockdev_direct_IO+0x5ff/0xb43
[161779.860636] [<ffffffffa06aaa73>] ? btrfs_page_exists_in_range+0x1ad/0x1ad [btrfs]
[161779.860636] [<ffffffffa06a2c9a>] ? btrfs_get_extent_fiemap+0x1bc/0x1bc [btrfs]
[161779.860636] [<ffffffff811977f5>] __blockdev_direct_IO+0x32/0x34
[161779.860636] [<ffffffffa06a2c9a>] ? btrfs_get_extent_fiemap+0x1bc/0x1bc [btrfs]
[161779.860636] [<ffffffffa06a10ae>] btrfs_direct_IO+0x198/0x21f [btrfs]
[161779.860636] [<ffffffffa06a2c9a>] ? btrfs_get_extent_fiemap+0x1bc/0x1bc [btrfs]
[161779.860636] [<ffffffff81112ca1>] generic_file_direct_write+0xb3/0x128
[161779.860636] [<ffffffffa06affaa>] ? btrfs_file_write_iter+0x15f/0x3e0 [btrfs]
[161779.860636] [<ffffffffa06b004c>] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x201/0x3e0 [btrfs]
(...)
We were also not freeing the btrfs_dio_private we allocated previously,
which kmemleak reported with the following trace in its sysfs file:
unreferenced object 0xffff8803f553bf80 (size 96):
comm "xfs_io", pid 4501, jiffies 4295039588 (age 173.936s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
88 6c 9b f5 02 88 ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 .l..............
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 c4 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace:
[<ffffffff81161ffe>] create_object+0x172/0x29a
[<ffffffff8145870f>] kmemleak_alloc+0x25/0x41
[<ffffffff81154e64>] kmemleak_alloc_recursive.constprop.40+0x16/0x18
[<ffffffff811579ed>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0xfb/0x148
[<ffffffffa03d8cff>] btrfs_submit_direct+0x65/0x16a [btrfs]
[<ffffffff811968dc>] dio_bio_submit+0x62/0x8f
[<ffffffff811975fe>] do_blockdev_direct_IO+0x97e/0xb43
[<ffffffff811977f5>] __blockdev_direct_IO+0x32/0x34
[<ffffffffa03d70ae>] btrfs_direct_IO+0x198/0x21f [btrfs]
[<ffffffff81112ca1>] generic_file_direct_write+0xb3/0x128
[<ffffffffa03e604d>] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x201/0x3e0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffff8116586a>] __vfs_write+0x7c/0xa5
[<ffffffff81165da9>] vfs_write+0xa0/0xe4
[<ffffffff81166675>] SyS_pwrite64+0x64/0x82
[<ffffffff81464fd7>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x6f
[<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
For read requests we weren't doing any cleanup either (none of the work
done by btrfs_endio_direct_read()), so a failure submitting a bio for a
read request would leave a range in the inode's io_tree locked forever,
blocking any future operations (both reads and writes) against that range.
So fix this by making sure we do the same cleanup that we do for the case
where the bio submission succeeds.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
We don't need to attach ordered extents that have completed to the current
transaction. Doing so only makes us hold memory for longer than necessary
and delaying the iput of the inode until the transaction is committed (for
each created ordered extent we do an igrab and then schedule an asynchronous
iput when the ordered extent's reference count drops to 0), preventing the
inode from being evictable until the transaction commits.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Commit 3a8b36f378 ("Btrfs: fix data loss in the fast fsync path") added
a performance regression for that causes an unnecessary sync of the log
trees (fs/subvol and root log trees) when 2 consecutive fsyncs are done
against a file, without no writes or any metadata updates to the inode in
between them and if a transaction is committed before the second fsync is
called.
Huang Ying reported this to lkml (https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/18/99)
after a test sysbench test that measured a -62% decrease of file io
requests per second for that tests' workload.
The test is:
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu2/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu3/cpufreq/scaling_governor
mkfs -t btrfs /dev/sda2
mount -t btrfs /dev/sda2 /fs/sda2
cd /fs/sda2
for ((i = 0; i < 1024; i++)); do fallocate -l 67108864 testfile.$i; done
sysbench --test=fileio --max-requests=0 --num-threads=4 --max-time=600 \
--file-test-mode=rndwr --file-total-size=68719476736 --file-io-mode=sync \
--file-num=1024 run
A test on kvm guest, running a debug kernel gave me the following results:
Without 3a8b36f378: 16.01 reqs/sec
With 3a8b36f378: 3.39 reqs/sec
With 3a8b36f378 and this patch: 16.04 reqs/sec
Reported-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
After commit 8407f55326
("Btrfs: fix data corruption after fast fsync and writeback error"),
during wait_ordered_extents(), we wait for ordered extent setting
BTRFS_ORDERED_IO_DONE or BTRFS_ORDERED_IOERR, at which point we've
already got checksum information, so we don't need to check
(csum_bytes_left == 0) in the whole logging path.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
When waiting for the writeback of block group cache we returned
immediately if there was an error during writeback without waiting
for the ordered extent to complete. This left a short time window
where if some other task attempts to start the writeout for the same
block group cache it can attempt to add a new ordered extent, starting
at the same offset (0) before the previous one is removed from the
ordered tree, causing an ordered tree panic (calls BUG()).
This normally doesn't happen in other write paths, such as buffered
writes or direct IO writes for regular files, since before marking
page ranges dirty we lock the ranges and wait for any ordered extents
within the range to complete first.
Fix this by making btrfs_wait_ordered_range() not return immediately
if it gets an error from the writeback, waiting for all ordered extents
to complete first.
This issue happened often when running the fstest btrfs/088 and it's
easy to trigger it by running in a loop until the panic happens:
for ((i = 1; i <= 10000; i++)) do ./check btrfs/088 ; done
[17156.862573] BTRFS critical (device sdc): panic in ordered_data_tree_panic:70: Inconsistency in ordered tree at offset 0 (errno=-17 Object already exists)
[17156.864052] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[17156.864052] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c:70!
(...)
[17156.864052] Call Trace:
[17156.864052] [<ffffffffa03876e3>] btrfs_add_ordered_extent+0x12/0x14 [btrfs]
[17156.864052] [<ffffffffa03787e2>] run_delalloc_nocow+0x5bf/0x747 [btrfs]
[17156.864052] [<ffffffffa03789ff>] run_delalloc_range+0x95/0x353 [btrfs]
[17156.864052] [<ffffffffa038b7fe>] writepage_delalloc.isra.16+0xb9/0x13f [btrfs]
[17156.864052] [<ffffffffa038d75b>] __extent_writepage+0x129/0x1f7 [btrfs]
[17156.864052] [<ffffffffa038da5a>] extent_write_cache_pages.isra.15.constprop.28+0x231/0x2f4 [btrfs]
[17156.864052] [<ffffffff810ad2af>] ? __module_text_address+0x12/0x59
[17156.864052] [<ffffffff8107d33d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
[17156.864052] [<ffffffffa038df76>] extent_writepages+0x4b/0x5c [btrfs]
[17156.864052] [<ffffffff81144431>] ? kmem_cache_free+0x9b/0xce
[17156.864052] [<ffffffffa0376a46>] ? btrfs_submit_direct+0x3fc/0x3fc [btrfs]
[17156.864052] [<ffffffffa0389cd6>] ? free_extent_state+0x8c/0xc1 [btrfs]
[17156.864052] [<ffffffffa0374871>] btrfs_writepages+0x28/0x2a [btrfs]
[17156.864052] [<ffffffff8110c4c8>] do_writepages+0x23/0x2c
[17156.864052] [<ffffffff81102f36>] __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x5a/0x61
[17156.864052] [<ffffffff81102f6e>] filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x13/0x15
[17156.864052] [<ffffffffa0383ef7>] btrfs_fdatawrite_range+0x21/0x48 [btrfs]
[17156.864052] [<ffffffffa03ab89e>] __btrfs_write_out_cache.isra.14+0x2d9/0x3a7 [btrfs]
[17156.864052] [<ffffffffa03ac1ab>] ? btrfs_write_out_cache+0x41/0xdc [btrfs]
[17156.864052] [<ffffffffa03ac1fd>] btrfs_write_out_cache+0x93/0xdc [btrfs]
[17156.864052] [<ffffffffa0363847>] ? btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x13a/0x2b2 [btrfs]
[17156.864052] [<ffffffffa03638e6>] btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x1d9/0x2b2 [btrfs]
[17156.864052] [<ffffffff8107d33d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
[17156.864052] [<ffffffffa037209e>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x130/0x9c9 [btrfs]
[17156.864052] [<ffffffffa034c748>] btrfs_sync_fs+0xe1/0x12d [btrfs]
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
We can have multiple fsync operations against the same file during the
same transaction and they can collect the same ordered extents while they
don't complete (still accessible from the inode's ordered tree). If this
happens, those ordered extents will never get their reference counts
decremented to 0, leading to memory leaks and inode leaks (an iput for an
ordered extent's inode is scheduled only when the ordered extent's refcount
drops to 0). The following sequence diagram explains this race:
CPU 1 CPU 2
btrfs_sync_file()
btrfs_sync_file()
mutex_lock(inode->i_mutex)
btrfs_log_inode()
btrfs_get_logged_extents()
--> collects ordered extent X
--> increments ordered
extent X's refcount
btrfs_submit_logged_extents()
mutex_unlock(inode->i_mutex)
mutex_lock(inode->i_mutex)
btrfs_sync_log()
btrfs_wait_logged_extents()
--> list_del_init(&ordered->log_list)
btrfs_log_inode()
btrfs_get_logged_extents()
--> Adds ordered extent X
to logged_list because
at this point:
list_empty(&ordered->log_list)
&& test_bit(BTRFS_ORDERED_LOGGED,
&ordered->flags) == 0
--> Increments ordered extent
X's refcount
--> check if ordered extent's io is
finished or not, start it if
necessary and wait for it to finish
--> sets bit BTRFS_ORDERED_LOGGED
on ordered extent X's flags
and adds it to trans->ordered
btrfs_sync_log() finishes
btrfs_submit_logged_extents()
btrfs_log_inode() finishes
mutex_unlock(inode->i_mutex)
btrfs_sync_file() finishes
btrfs_sync_log()
btrfs_wait_logged_extents()
--> Sees ordered extent X has the
bit BTRFS_ORDERED_LOGGED set in
its flags
--> X's refcount is untouched
btrfs_sync_log() finishes
btrfs_sync_file() finishes
btrfs_commit_transaction()
--> called by transaction kthread for e.g.
btrfs_wait_pending_ordered()
--> waits for ordered extent X to
complete
--> decrements ordered extent X's
refcount by 1 only, corresponding
to the increment done by the fsync
task ran by CPU 1
In the scenario of the above diagram, after the transaction commit,
the ordered extent will remain with a refcount of 1 forever, leaking
the ordered extent structure and preventing the i_count of its inode
from ever decreasing to 0, since the delayed iput is scheduled only
when the ordered extent's refcount drops to 0, preventing the inode
from ever being evicted by the VFS.
Fix this by using the flag BTRFS_ORDERED_LOGGED differently. Use it to
mean that an ordered extent is already being processed by an fsync call,
which will attach it to the current transaction, preventing it from being
collected by subsequent fsync operations against the same inode.
This race was introduced with the following change (added in 3.19 and
backported to stable 3.18 and 3.17):
Btrfs: make sure logged extents complete in the current transaction V3
commit 50d9aa99bd
I ran into this issue while running xfstests/generic/113 in a loop, which
failed about 1 out of 10 runs with the following warning in dmesg:
[ 2612.440038] WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 22057 at fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:3558 free_fs_root+0x36/0x133 [btrfs]()
[ 2612.442810] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq nfsd auth_rpcgss oid_registry nfs_acl nfs lockd grace fscache sunrpc loop processor parport_pc parport psmouse therma
l_sys i2c_piix4 serio_raw pcspkr evdev microcode button i2c_core ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sd_mod sg sr_mod cdrom virtio_scsi ata_generic virtio_pci ata_piix virtio_ring libata virtio flo
ppy e1000 scsi_mod [last unloaded: btrfs]
[ 2612.452711] CPU: 4 PID: 22057 Comm: umount Tainted: G W 3.19.0-rc5-btrfs-next-4+ #1
[ 2612.454921] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.7.5-0-ge51488c-20140602_164612-nilsson.home.kraxel.org 04/01/2014
[ 2612.457709] 0000000000000009 ffff8801342c3c78 ffffffff8142425e ffff88023ec8f2d8
[ 2612.459829] 0000000000000000 ffff8801342c3cb8 ffffffff81045308 ffff880046460000
[ 2612.461564] ffffffffa036da56 ffff88003d07b000 ffff880046460000 ffff880046460068
[ 2612.463163] Call Trace:
[ 2612.463719] [<ffffffff8142425e>] dump_stack+0x4c/0x65
[ 2612.464789] [<ffffffff81045308>] warn_slowpath_common+0xa1/0xbb
[ 2612.466026] [<ffffffffa036da56>] ? free_fs_root+0x36/0x133 [btrfs]
[ 2612.467247] [<ffffffff810453c5>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x1c
[ 2612.468416] [<ffffffffa036da56>] free_fs_root+0x36/0x133 [btrfs]
[ 2612.469625] [<ffffffffa036f2a7>] btrfs_drop_and_free_fs_root+0x93/0x9b [btrfs]
[ 2612.471251] [<ffffffffa036f353>] btrfs_free_fs_roots+0xa4/0xd6 [btrfs]
[ 2612.472536] [<ffffffff8142612e>] ? wait_for_completion+0x24/0x26
[ 2612.473742] [<ffffffffa0370bbc>] close_ctree+0x1f3/0x33c [btrfs]
[ 2612.475477] [<ffffffff81059d1d>] ? destroy_workqueue+0x148/0x1ba
[ 2612.476695] [<ffffffffa034e3da>] btrfs_put_super+0x19/0x1b [btrfs]
[ 2612.477911] [<ffffffff81153e53>] generic_shutdown_super+0x73/0xef
[ 2612.479106] [<ffffffff811540e2>] kill_anon_super+0x13/0x1e
[ 2612.480226] [<ffffffffa034e1e3>] btrfs_kill_super+0x17/0x23 [btrfs]
[ 2612.481471] [<ffffffff81154307>] deactivate_locked_super+0x3b/0x50
[ 2612.482686] [<ffffffff811547a7>] deactivate_super+0x3f/0x43
[ 2612.483791] [<ffffffff8116b3ed>] cleanup_mnt+0x59/0x78
[ 2612.484842] [<ffffffff8116b44c>] __cleanup_mnt+0x12/0x14
[ 2612.485900] [<ffffffff8105d019>] task_work_run+0x8f/0xbc
[ 2612.486960] [<ffffffff810028d8>] do_notify_resume+0x5a/0x6b
[ 2612.488083] [<ffffffff81236e5b>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
[ 2612.489333] [<ffffffff8142a17f>] int_signal+0x12/0x17
[ 2612.490353] ---[ end trace 54a960a6bdcb8d93 ]---
[ 2612.557253] VFS: Busy inodes after unmount of sdb. Self-destruct in 5 seconds. Have a nice day...
Kmemleak confirmed the ordered extent leak (and btrfs inode specific
structures such as delayed nodes):
$ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
unreferenced object 0xffff880154290db0 (size 576):
comm "btrfsck", pid 21980, jiffies 4295542503 (age 1273.412s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
01 40 00 00 01 00 00 00 b0 1d f1 4e 01 88 ff ff .@.........N....
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 c8 0d 29 54 01 88 ff ff ..........)T....
backtrace:
[<ffffffff8141d74d>] kmemleak_update_trace+0x4c/0x6a
[<ffffffff8122f2c0>] radix_tree_node_alloc+0x6d/0x83
[<ffffffff8122fb26>] __radix_tree_create+0x109/0x190
[<ffffffff8122fbdd>] radix_tree_insert+0x30/0xac
[<ffffffffa03b9bde>] btrfs_get_or_create_delayed_node+0x130/0x187 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa03bb82d>] btrfs_delayed_delete_inode_ref+0x32/0xac [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa0379dae>] __btrfs_unlink_inode+0xee/0x288 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa037c715>] btrfs_unlink_inode+0x1e/0x40 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa037c797>] btrfs_unlink+0x60/0x9b [btrfs]
[<ffffffff8115d7f0>] vfs_unlink+0x9c/0xed
[<ffffffff8115f5de>] do_unlinkat+0x12c/0x1fa
[<ffffffff811601a7>] SyS_unlinkat+0x29/0x2b
[<ffffffff81429e92>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x17
[<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
unreferenced object 0xffff88014ef11db0 (size 576):
comm "rm", pid 22009, jiffies 4295542593 (age 1273.052s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
02 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 c8 1d f1 4e 01 88 ff ff ...........N....
backtrace:
[<ffffffff8141d74d>] kmemleak_update_trace+0x4c/0x6a
[<ffffffff8122f2c0>] radix_tree_node_alloc+0x6d/0x83
[<ffffffff8122fb26>] __radix_tree_create+0x109/0x190
[<ffffffff8122fbdd>] radix_tree_insert+0x30/0xac
[<ffffffffa03b9bde>] btrfs_get_or_create_delayed_node+0x130/0x187 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa03bb82d>] btrfs_delayed_delete_inode_ref+0x32/0xac [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa0379dae>] __btrfs_unlink_inode+0xee/0x288 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa037c715>] btrfs_unlink_inode+0x1e/0x40 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa037c797>] btrfs_unlink+0x60/0x9b [btrfs]
[<ffffffff8115d7f0>] vfs_unlink+0x9c/0xed
[<ffffffff8115f5de>] do_unlinkat+0x12c/0x1fa
[<ffffffff811601a7>] SyS_unlinkat+0x29/0x2b
[<ffffffff81429e92>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x17
[<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
unreferenced object 0xffff8800336feda8 (size 584):
comm "aio-stress", pid 22031, jiffies 4295543006 (age 1271.400s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
00 40 3e 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 8f 42 00 00 00 00 .@>........B....
00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace:
[<ffffffff8114eb34>] create_object+0x172/0x29a
[<ffffffff8141d790>] kmemleak_alloc+0x25/0x41
[<ffffffff81141ae6>] kmemleak_alloc_recursive.constprop.52+0x16/0x18
[<ffffffff81145288>] kmem_cache_alloc+0xf7/0x198
[<ffffffffa0389243>] __btrfs_add_ordered_extent+0x43/0x309 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa038968b>] btrfs_add_ordered_extent_dio+0x12/0x14 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa03810e2>] btrfs_get_blocks_direct+0x3ef/0x571 [btrfs]
[<ffffffff81181349>] do_blockdev_direct_IO+0x62a/0xb47
[<ffffffff8118189a>] __blockdev_direct_IO+0x34/0x36
[<ffffffffa03776e5>] btrfs_direct_IO+0x16a/0x1e8 [btrfs]
[<ffffffff81100373>] generic_file_direct_write+0xb8/0x12d
[<ffffffffa038615c>] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x24b/0x42f [btrfs]
[<ffffffff8118bb0d>] aio_run_iocb+0x2b7/0x32e
[<ffffffff8118c99a>] do_io_submit+0x26e/0x2ff
[<ffffffff8118ca3b>] SyS_io_submit+0x10/0x12
[<ffffffff81429e92>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x17
CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.19, 3.18 and 3.17
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Instead of collecting all ordered extents from the inode's ordered tree
and then wait for all of them to complete, just collect the ones that
overlap the fsync range.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Liu Bo pointed out that my previous fix would lose the generation update in the
scenario I described. It is actually much worse than that, we could lose the
entire extent if we lose power right after the transaction commits. Consider
the following
write extent 0-4k
log extent in log tree
commit transaction
< power fail happens here
ordered extent completes
We would lose the 0-4k extent because it hasn't updated the actual fs tree, and
the transaction commit will reset the log so it isn't replayed. If we lose
power before the transaction commit we are save, otherwise we are not.
Fix this by keeping track of all extents we logged in this transaction. Then
when we go to commit the transaction make sure we wait for all of those ordered
extents to complete before proceeding. This will make sure that if we lose
power after the transaction commit we still have our data. This also fixes the
problem of the improperly updated extent generation. Thanks,
cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
To avoid duplicating this double filemap_fdatawrite_range() call for
inodes with async extents (compressed writes) so often.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
This has been reported and discussed for a long time, and this hang occurs in
both 3.15 and 3.16.
Btrfs now migrates to use kernel workqueue, but it introduces this hang problem.
Btrfs has a kind of work queued as an ordered way, which means that its
ordered_func() must be processed in the way of FIFO, so it usually looks like --
normal_work_helper(arg)
work = container_of(arg, struct btrfs_work, normal_work);
work->func() <---- (we name it work X)
for ordered_work in wq->ordered_list
ordered_work->ordered_func()
ordered_work->ordered_free()
The hang is a rare case, first when we find free space, we get an uncached block
group, then we go to read its free space cache inode for free space information,
so it will
file a readahead request
btrfs_readpages()
for page that is not in page cache
__do_readpage()
submit_extent_page()
btrfs_submit_bio_hook()
btrfs_bio_wq_end_io()
submit_bio()
end_workqueue_bio() <--(ret by the 1st endio)
queue a work(named work Y) for the 2nd
also the real endio()
So the hang occurs when work Y's work_struct and work X's work_struct happens
to share the same address.
A bit more explanation,
A,B,C -- struct btrfs_work
arg -- struct work_struct
kthread:
worker_thread()
pick up a work_struct from @worklist
process_one_work(arg)
worker->current_work = arg; <-- arg is A->normal_work
worker->current_func(arg)
normal_work_helper(arg)
A = container_of(arg, struct btrfs_work, normal_work);
A->func()
A->ordered_func()
A->ordered_free() <-- A gets freed
B->ordered_func()
submit_compressed_extents()
find_free_extent()
load_free_space_inode()
... <-- (the above readhead stack)
end_workqueue_bio()
btrfs_queue_work(work C)
B->ordered_free()
As if work A has a high priority in wq->ordered_list and there are more ordered
works queued after it, such as B->ordered_func(), its memory could have been
freed before normal_work_helper() returns, which means that kernel workqueue
code worker_thread() still has worker->current_work pointer to be work
A->normal_work's, ie. arg's address.
Meanwhile, work C is allocated after work A is freed, work C->normal_work
and work A->normal_work are likely to share the same address(I confirmed this
with ftrace output, so I'm not just guessing, it's rare though).
When another kthread picks up work C->normal_work to process, and finds our
kthread is processing it(see find_worker_executing_work()), it'll think
work C as a collision and skip then, which ends up nobody processing work C.
So the situation is that our kthread is waiting forever on work C.
Besides, there're other cases that can lead to deadlock, but the real problem
is that all btrfs workqueue shares one work->func, -- normal_work_helper,
so this makes each workqueue to have its own helper function, but only a
wraper pf normal_work_helper.
With this patch, I no long hit the above hang.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Truncates and renames are often used to replace old versions of a file
with new versions. Applications often expect this to be an atomic
replacement, even if they haven't done anything to make sure the new
version is fully on disk.
Btrfs has strict flushing in place to make sure that renaming over an
old file with a new file will fully flush out the new file before
allowing the transaction commit with the rename to complete.
This ordering means the commit code needs to be able to lock file pages,
and there are a few paths in the filesystem where we will try to end a
transaction with the page lock held. It's rare, but these things can
deadlock.
This patch removes the ordered flushes and switches to a best effort
filemap_flush like ext4 uses. It's not perfect, but it should fix the
deadlocks.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
xfstests generic/127 detected this problem.
With commit 7fc34a62ca, now fsync will only flush
data within the passed range. This is the cause of the above problem,
-- btrfs's fsync has a stage called 'sync log' which will wait for all the
ordered extents it've recorded to finish.
In xfstests/generic/127, with mixed operations such as truncate, fallocate,
punch hole, and mapwrite, we get some pre-allocated extents, and mapwrite will
mmap, and then msync. And I find that msync will wait for quite a long time
(about 20s in my case), thanks to ftrace, it turns out that the previous
fallocate calls 'btrfs_wait_ordered_range()' to flush dirty pages, but as the
range of dirty pages may be larger than 'btrfs_wait_ordered_range()' wants,
there can be some ordered extents created but not getting corresponding pages
flushed, then they're left in memory until we fsync which runs into the
stage 'sync log', and fsync will just wait for the system writeback thread
to flush those pages and get ordered extents finished, so the latency is
inevitable.
This adds a flush similar to btrfs_start_ordered_extent() in
btrfs_wait_logged_extents() to fix that.
Reviewed-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
I've noticed an extra line after "use no compression", but search
revealed much more in messages of more critical levels and rare errors.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
When we create a snapshot, we just need wait the ordered extents in
the source fs/file root, but because we use the global mutex to protect
this ordered extents list of the source fs/file root to avoid accessing
a empty list, if someone got the mutex to access the ordered extents list
of the other fs/file root, we had to wait.
This patch splits the above global mutex, now every fs/file root has
its own mutex to protect its own list.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
The tasks that wait for the IO_DONE flag just care about the io of the dirty
pages, so it is better to wake up them immediately after all the pages are
written, not the whole process of the io completes.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
btrfs_wait_ordered_roots() moves all the list entries to a new list,
and then deals with them one by one. But if the other task invokes this
function at that time, it would get a empty list. It makes the enospc
error happens more early. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Since the "_struct" suffix is mainly used for distinguish the differnt
btrfs_work between the original and the newly created one,
there is no need using the suffix since all btrfs_workers are changed
into btrfs_workqueue.
Also this patch fixed some codes whose code style is changed due to the
too long "_struct" suffix.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Replace the fs_info->submit_workers with the newly created
btrfs_workqueue.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
There was a problem in the old code:
If we failed to log the csum, we would free all the ordered extents in the log list
including those ordered extents that were logged successfully, it would make the
log committer not to wait for the completion of the ordered extents.
This patch doesn't insert the ordered extents that is about to be logged into
a global list, instead, we insert them into a local list. If we log the ordered
extents successfully, we splice them with the global list, or we will throw them
away, then do full sync. It can also reduce the lock contention and the traverse
time of list.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Convert all applicable cases of printk and pr_* to the btrfs_* macros.
Fix all uses of the BTRFS prefix.
Signed-off-by: Frank Holton <fholton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
After an ordered extent completes, don't blindly reset the
inode's ordered tree last accessed ordered extent pointer.
While running the xfstests I noticed that about 29% of the
time the ordered extent to which tree->last pointed was not
the same as our just completed ordered extent. After that I
ran the following sysbench test (after a prepare phase) and
noticed that about 68% of the time tree->last pointed to
a different ordered extent too.
sysbench --test=fileio --file-num=32 --file-total-size=4G \
--file-test-mode=rndwr --num-threads=512 \
--file-block-size=32768 --max-time=60 --max-requests=0 run
Therefore reset tree->last on ordered extent removal only if
it pointed to the ordered extent we're removing from the tree.
Results from 4 runs of the following test before and after
applying this patch:
$ sysbench --test=fileio --file-num=32 --file-total-size=4G \
--file-test-mode=seqwr --num-threads=512 \
--file-block-size=32768 --max-time=60 --file-io-mode=sync prepare
$ sysbench --test=fileio --file-num=32 --file-total-size=4G \
--file-test-mode=seqwr --num-threads=512 \
--file-block-size=32768 --max-time=60 --file-io-mode=sync run
Before this path:
run 1 - 64.049Mb/sec
run 2 - 63.455Mb/sec
run 3 - 64.656Mb/sec
run 4 - 63.833Mb/sec
After this patch:
run 1 - 66.149Mb/sec
run 2 - 68.459Mb/sec
run 3 - 66.338Mb/sec
run 4 - 66.176Mb/sec
With random writes (--file-test-mode=rndwr) I had huge fluctuations
on the results (+- 35% easily).
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Commit b02441999e "Btrfs: don't wait for
the completion of all the ordered extents" introduced a bug that broke
the ordered root list:
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 7119 at lib/list_debug.c:59 __list_del_entry+0x5a/0x98()
It is because we forgot to return the roots in the splice list to the
ordered list of the fs. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
In btrfs_wait_ordered_range(), if we found an extent to the left
of the start of our desired wait range and the last byte of that
extent is 1 less than the desired range's start, we would would
wait for the IO completion of that extent unnecessarily.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
It is very likely that there are lots of ordered extents in the filesytem,
if we wait for the completion of all of them when we want to reclaim some
space for the metadata space reservation, we would be blocked for a long
time. The performance would drop down suddenly for a long time.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
A user reported a list corruption warning from btrfs_remove_ordered_extent, it
is because we aren't taking the ordered_root_lock when we remove the inode from
the ordered operations list. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
I noticed that if the free space cache has an error writing out it's data it
won't actually error out, it will just carry on. This is because it doesn't
check the return value of btrfs_wait_ordered_range, which didn't actually return
anything. So fix this in order to keep us from making free space cache look
valid when it really isnt. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Comparison of an inode's last modified transaction with the last committed
transaction is incorrect. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: chandan <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
This is a left over of how we used to wait for ordered extents, which was to
grab the inode and then run filemap flush on it. However if we have an ordered
extent then we already are holding a ref on the inode, and we just use
btrfs_start_ordered_extent anyway, so there is no reason to have an extra ref on
the inode to start work on the ordered extent. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
We currently have this problem where you can truncate pages that have not yet
been written for an ordered extent. We do this because the truncate will be
coming behind to clean us up anyway so what's the harm right? Well if truncate
fails for whatever reason we leave an orphan item around for the file to be
cleaned up later. But if the user goes and truncates up the file and tries to
read from the area that had been discarded previously they will get a csum error
because we never actually wrote that data out.
This patch fixes this by allowing us to either discard the ordered extent
completely, by which I mean we just free up the space we had allocated and not
add the file extent, or adjust the length of the file extent we write. We do
this by setting the length we truncated down to in the ordered extent, and then
we set the file extent length and ram bytes to this length. The total disk
space stays unchanged since we may be compressed and we can't just chop off the
disk space, but at least this way the file extent only points to the valid data.
Then when the file extent is free'd the extent and csums will be freed normally.
This patch is needed for the next series which will give us more graceful
recovery of failed truncates. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
u64 is "unsigned long long" on all architectures now, so there's no need to
cast it when formatting it using the "ll" length modifier.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
I added a patch where we started taking the ordered operations mutex when we
waited on ordered extents. We need this because we splice the list and process
it, so if a flusher came in during this scenario it would think the list was
empty and we'd usually get an early ENOSPC. The problem with this is that this
lock is used in transaction committing. So we end up with something like this
Transaction commit
-> wait on writers
Delalloc flusher
-> run_ordered_operations (holds mutex)
->wait for filemap-flush to do its thing
flush task
-> cow_file_range
->wait on btrfs_join_transaction because we're commiting
some other task
-> commit_transaction because we notice trans->transaction->flush is set
-> run_ordered_operations (hang on mutex)
We need to disentangle the ordered operations flushing from the delalloc
flushing, since they are separate things. This solves the deadlock issue I was
seeing. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Using the structure btrfs_sector_sum to keep the checksum value is
unnecessary, because the extents that btrfs_sector_sum points to are
continuous, we can find out the expected checksums by btrfs_ordered_sum's
bytenr and the offset, so we can remove btrfs_sector_sum's bytenr. After
removing bytenr, there is only one member in the structure, so it makes
no sense to keep the structure, just remove it, and use a u32 array to
store the checksum value.
By this change, we don't use the while loop to get the checksums one by
one. Now, we can get several checksum value at one time, it improved the
performance by ~74% on my SSD (31MB/s -> 54MB/s).
test command:
# dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/btrfs/file0 bs=1M count=1024 oflag=sync
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
The reason we introduce per-subvolume ordered extent list is the same
as the per-subvolume delalloc inode list.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
It is very likely that there are several blocks in bio, it is very
inefficient if we get their csums one by one. This patch improves
this problem by getting the csums in batch.
According to the result of the following test, the execute time of
__btrfs_lookup_bio_sums() is down by ~28%(300us -> 217us).
# dd if=<mnt>/file of=/dev/null bs=1M count=1024
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
We need to hold the ordered_operations mutex while waiting on ordered extents
since we splice and run the ordered extents list. We need to make sure anybody
else who wants to wait on ordered extents does actually wait for them to be
completed. This will keep us from bailing out of flushing in case somebody is
already waiting on ordered extents to complete. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Miao made the ordered operations stuff run async, which introduced a
deadlock where we could get somebody (sync) racing in and committing the
transaction while a commit was already happening. The new committer would
try and flush ordered operations which would hang waiting for the commit to
finish because it is done asynchronously and no longer inherits the callers
trans handle. To fix this we need to make the ordered operations list a per
transaction list. We can get new inodes added to the ordered operation list
by truncating them and then having another process writing to them, so this
makes it so that anybody trying to add an ordered operation _must_ start a
transaction in order to add itself to the list, which will keep new inodes
from getting added to the ordered operations list after we start committing.
This should fix the deadlock and also keeps us from doing a lot more work
than we need to during commit. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
btrfs_run_ordered_operations() needn't traverse the ordered operation list
repeatedly, it is because the transaction commiter will invoke it again when
there is no other writer in this transaction, it can ensure that no one can
add new objects into the ordered operation list.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Since we don't actually copy the extent information from the source tree in
the fast case we don't need to wait for ordered io to be completed in order
to fsync, we just need to wait for the io to be completed. So when we're
logging our file just attach all of the ordered extents to the log, and then
when the log syncs just wait for IO_DONE on the ordered extents and then
write the super. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
We specifically do not update the disk i_size if there are ordered extents
outstanding for any area between the current disk_i_size and our ordered
extent so that we do not expose stale data. The problem is the check we
have only checks if the ordered extent starts at or after the current
disk_i_size, which doesn't take into account an ordered extent that starts
before the current disk_i_size and ends past the disk_i_size. Fix this by
checking if the extent ends past the disk_i_size. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
If we have an ordered extent before the ordered extent we are currently
completing that is after the current disk_i_size we will put our i_size
update into that ordered extent so that we do not expose stale data. The
problem is that if our disk i_size is updated past the previous ordered
extent we won't update the i_size with the pending i_size update. So check
the pending i_size update and if its above the current disk i_size we need
to go ahead and try to update. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Though the process of the ordered extents is a bit different with the delalloc inode
flush, but we can see it as a subset of the delalloc inode flush, so we also handle
them by flush workers.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
The process of the ordered operations is similar to the delalloc inode flush, so
we handle them by flush workers.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
