Currently the bpf frame pointer is set to the old r15. This is
wrong because of packed stack. Fix this and adjust the frame pointer
to respect packed stack. This now generates a prolog like the following:
3ff8001c3fa: eb67f0480024 stmg %r6,%r7,72(%r15)
3ff8001c400: ebcff0780024 stmg %r12,%r15,120(%r15)
3ff8001c406: b904001f lgr %r1,%r15 <- load backchain
3ff8001c40a: 41d0f048 la %r13,72(%r15) <- load adjusted bfp
3ff8001c40e: a7fbfd98 aghi %r15,-616
3ff8001c412: e310f0980024 stg %r1,152(%r15) <- save backchain
Fixes: 0546231057 ("s390/bpf: Add s390x eBPF JIT compiler backend")
Signed-off-by: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
On s390x we have to provide 160 bytes stack space before we can call
the next function. From the 160 bytes that we got from the previous
function we only use 11 * 8 bytes and have 160 - 11 * 8 bytes left.
Currently for BPF we allocate additional 160 - 11 * 8 bytes for the
next function. This is wrong because then the next function only gets:
(160 - 11 * 8) + (160 - 11 * 8) = 2 * 72 = 144 bytes
Fix this and allocate enough memory for the next function.
Fixes: 0546231057 ("s390/bpf: Add s390x eBPF JIT compiler backend")
Signed-off-by: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
When compiling the kernel for GCOV (CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL,-fprofile-arcs),
gcc allocates a lot of stack space because of the large switch statement
in bpf_jit_insn().
This leads to the following compile warning:
arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c: In function 'bpf_jit_prog':
arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:1144:1: warning: frame size of
function 'bpf_jit_prog' is 12592 bytes which is more than
half the stack size. The dynamic check would not be reliable.
No check emitted for this function.
arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:1144:1: warning: the frame size of 12504
bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
And indead gcc allocates 12592 bytes of stack space:
# objdump -d arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.o
...
0000000000000c60 <bpf_jit_prog>:
c60: eb 6f f0 48 00 24 stmg %r6,%r15,72(%r15)
c66: b9 04 00 ef lgr %r14,%r15
c6a: e3 f0 fe d0 fc 71 lay %r15,-12592(%r15)
As a workaround of that problem we now define bpf_jit_insn() as
noinline which then reduces the stack space.
# objdump -d arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.o
...
0000000000000070 <bpf_jit_insn>:
70: eb 6f f0 48 00 24 stmg %r6,%r15,72(%r15)
76: c0 d0 00 00 00 00 larl %r13,76 <bpf_jit_insn+0x6>
7c: a7 f1 3f 80 tmll %r15,16256
80: b9 04 00 ef lgr %r14,%r15
84: e3 f0 ff a0 ff 71 lay %r15,-96(%r15)
Signed-off-by: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
The s390x ALU64_DIV/MOD has been implemented according to the eBPF
interpreter specification that used do_div(). This function does a 64-bit
by 32-bit divide. It turned out that this was wrong and now the interpreter
uses div64_u64_rem() for full 64-bit division.
So fix this and use full 64-bit division in the s390x eBPF backend code.
Signed-off-by: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Replace 32 bit BPF JIT backend with new 64 bit eBPF backend.
Signed-off-by: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
The s390x ABI requires to zero extend parameters before functions
are called.
Signed-off-by: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
In sk_load_byte_msh() sk_load_byte_slow() is called instead of
sk_load_byte_msh_slow(). Fix this and call the correct function.
Besides of this load only one byte instead of two and fix the comment.
Signed-off-by: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Currently the offset parameter for skb_copy_bits is changed in
sk_load_word() and sk_load_half(). Therefore it is not correct when
calling skb_copy_bits(). Fix this and use the original offset
for the function call.
Signed-off-by: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
The skb_copy_bits() function has the following signature:
int skb_copy_bits(const struct sk_buff *skb, int offset, void *to, int len)
Currently in bpf_jit.S the "to" and "len" parameters have been
exchanged. So fix this and call the function with the correct
parameters.
Signed-off-by: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Currently the signed COMPARE HALFWORD IMMEDIATE (chi) and COMPARE (c)
instructions are used to compare "A" with "K". This is not correct
because "A" and "K" are both unsigned. To fix this remove the
chi instruction (no unsigned analogon available) and use the
unsigned COMPARE LOGICAL (cl) instruction instead of COMPARE (c).
Signed-off-by: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Currently the signed COMPARE (cr) instruction is used to compare "A"
with "X". This is not correct because "A" and "X" are both unsigned.
To fix this use the unsigned COMPARE LOGICAL (clr) instruction instead.
Signed-off-by: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Currently the LOAD NEGATIVE (lnr) instruction is used for ALU_NEG. This
instruction always loads the negative value. Therefore, if A is already
negative, it remains unchanged. To fix this use LOAD COMPLEMENT (lcr)
instead.
Signed-off-by: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Currently we have 2 pkt_type_offset functions doing the same thing and
spread across the architecture files. Remove those and replace them
with a PKT_TYPE_OFFSET macro helper which gets the constant value from a
zero sized sk_buff member right in front of the bitfield with offsetof.
This new offset marker does not change size of struct sk_buff.
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org>
Signed-off-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Reported by Mikulas Patocka, kmemcheck currently barks out a
false positive since we don't have special kmemcheck annotation
for bitfields used in bpf_prog structure.
We currently have jited:1, len:31 and thus when accessing len
while CONFIG_KMEMCHECK enabled, kmemcheck throws a warning that
we're reading uninitialized memory.
As we don't need the whole bit universe for pages member, we
can just split it to u16 and use a bool flag for jited instead
of a bitfield.
Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Introduced in commit 314beb9bca ("x86: bpf_jit_comp: secure bpf jit
against spraying attacks") and later on replicated in aa2d2c73c2
("s390/bpf,jit: address randomize and write protect jit code") for
s390 architecture, write protection for BPF JIT images got added and
a random start address of the JIT code, so that it's not on a page
boundary anymore.
Since both use a very similar allocator for the BPF binary header,
we can consolidate this code into the BPF core as it's mostly JIT
independant anyway.
This will also allow for future archs that support DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX
to just reuse instead of reimplementing it.
JIT tested on x86_64 and s390x with BPF test suite.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
With eBPF getting more extended and exposure to user space is on it's way,
hardening the memory range the interpreter uses to steer its command flow
seems appropriate. This patch moves the to be interpreted bytecode to
read-only pages.
In case we execute a corrupted BPF interpreter image for some reason e.g.
caused by an attacker which got past a verifier stage, it would not only
provide arbitrary read/write memory access but arbitrary function calls
as well. After setting up the BPF interpreter image, its contents do not
change until destruction time, thus we can setup the image on immutable
made pages in order to mitigate modifications to that code. The idea
is derived from commit 314beb9bca ("x86: bpf_jit_comp: secure bpf jit
against spraying attacks").
This is possible because bpf_prog is not part of sk_filter anymore.
After setup bpf_prog cannot be altered during its life-time. This prevents
any modifications to the entire bpf_prog structure (incl. function/JIT
image pointer).
Every eBPF program (including classic BPF that are migrated) have to call
bpf_prog_select_runtime() to select either interpreter or a JIT image
as a last setup step, and they all are being freed via bpf_prog_free(),
including non-JIT. Therefore, we can easily integrate this into the
eBPF life-time, plus since we directly allocate a bpf_prog, we have no
performance penalty.
Tested with seccomp and test_bpf testsuite in JIT/non-JIT mode and manual
inspection of kernel_page_tables. Brad Spengler proposed the same idea
via Twitter during development of this patch.
Joint work with Hannes Frederic Sowa.
Suggested-by: Brad Spengler <spender@grsecurity.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
clean up names related to socket filtering and bpf in the following way:
- everything that deals with sockets keeps 'sk_*' prefix
- everything that is pure BPF is changed to 'bpf_*' prefix
split 'struct sk_filter' into
struct sk_filter {
atomic_t refcnt;
struct rcu_head rcu;
struct bpf_prog *prog;
};
and
struct bpf_prog {
u32 jited:1,
len:31;
struct sock_fprog_kern *orig_prog;
unsigned int (*bpf_func)(const struct sk_buff *skb,
const struct bpf_insn *filter);
union {
struct sock_filter insns[0];
struct bpf_insn insnsi[0];
struct work_struct work;
};
};
so that 'struct bpf_prog' can be used independent of sockets and cleans up
'unattached' bpf use cases
split SK_RUN_FILTER macro into:
SK_RUN_FILTER to be used with 'struct sk_filter *' and
BPF_PROG_RUN to be used with 'struct bpf_prog *'
__sk_filter_release(struct sk_filter *) gains
__bpf_prog_release(struct bpf_prog *) helper function
also perform related renames for the functions that work
with 'struct bpf_prog *', since they're on the same lines:
sk_filter_size -> bpf_prog_size
sk_filter_select_runtime -> bpf_prog_select_runtime
sk_filter_free -> bpf_prog_free
sk_unattached_filter_create -> bpf_prog_create
sk_unattached_filter_destroy -> bpf_prog_destroy
sk_store_orig_filter -> bpf_prog_store_orig_filter
sk_release_orig_filter -> bpf_release_orig_filter
__sk_migrate_filter -> bpf_migrate_filter
__sk_prepare_filter -> bpf_prepare_filter
API for attaching classic BPF to a socket stays the same:
sk_attach_filter(prog, struct sock *)/sk_detach_filter(struct sock *)
and SK_RUN_FILTER(struct sk_filter *, ctx) to execute a program
which is used by sockets, tun, af_packet
API for 'unattached' BPF programs becomes:
bpf_prog_create(struct bpf_prog **)/bpf_prog_destroy(struct bpf_prog *)
and BPF_PROG_RUN(struct bpf_prog *, ctx) to execute a program
which is used by isdn, ppp, team, seccomp, ptp, xt_bpf, cls_bpf, test_bpf
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This patch finally allows us to get rid of the BPF_S_* enum.
Currently, the code performs unnecessary encode and decode
workarounds in seccomp and filter migration itself when a filter
is being attached in order to overcome BPF_S_* encoding which
is not used anymore by the new interpreter resp. JIT compilers.
Keeping it around would mean that also in future we would need
to extend and maintain this enum and related encoders/decoders.
We can get rid of all that and save us these operations during
filter attaching. Naturally, also JIT compilers need to be updated
by this.
Before JIT conversion is being done, each compiler checks if A
is being loaded at startup to obtain information if it needs to
emit instructions to clear A first. Since BPF extensions are a
subset of BPF_LD | BPF_{W,H,B} | BPF_ABS variants, case statements
for extensions can be removed at that point. To ease and minimalize
code changes in the classic JITs, we have introduced bpf_anc_helper().
Tested with test_bpf on x86_64 (JIT, int), s390x (JIT, int),
arm (JIT, int), i368 (int), ppc64 (JIT, int); for sparc we
unfortunately didn't have access, but changes are analogous to
the rest.
Joint work with Alexei Starovoitov.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Mircea Gherzan <mgherzan@gmail.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Chema Gonzalez <chemag@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This is the s390 variant of Alexei's JIT bug fix.
(patch description below stolen from Alexei's patch)
bpf_alloc_binary() adds 128 bytes of room to JITed program image
and rounds it up to the nearest page size. If image size is close
to page size (like 4000), it is rounded to two pages:
round_up(4000 + 4 + 128) == 8192
then 'hole' is computed as 8192 - (4000 + 4) = 4188
If prandom_u32() % hole selects a number >= PAGE_SIZE - sizeof(*header)
then kernel will crash during bpf_jit_free():
kernel BUG at arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c:887!
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff81037285>] change_page_attr_set_clr+0x135/0x460
[<ffffffff81694cc0>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x30/0x50
[<ffffffff810378ff>] set_memory_rw+0x2f/0x40
[<ffffffffa01a0d8d>] bpf_jit_free_deferred+0x2d/0x60
[<ffffffff8106bf98>] process_one_work+0x1d8/0x6a0
[<ffffffff8106bf38>] ? process_one_work+0x178/0x6a0
[<ffffffff8106c90c>] worker_thread+0x11c/0x370
since bpf_jit_free() does:
unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)fp->bpf_func & PAGE_MASK;
struct bpf_binary_header *header = (void *)addr;
to compute start address of 'bpf_binary_header'
and header->pages will pass junk to:
set_memory_rw(addr, header->pages);
Fix it by making sure that &header->image[prandom_u32() % hole] and &header
are in the same page.
Fixes: aa2d2c73c2 ("s390/bpf,jit: address randomize and write protect jit code")
Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.11+
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The A register needs to be initialized to zero in the prolog if the
first instruction of the BPF program is BPF_S_LDX_B_MSH to prevent
leaking the content of %r5 to user space.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
This patch adds a jited flag into sk_filter struct in order to indicate
whether a filter is currently jited or not. The size of sk_filter is
not being expanded as the 32 bit 'len' member allows upper bits to be
reused since a filter can currently only grow as large as BPF_MAXINSNS.
Therefore, there's enough room also for other in future needed flags to
reuse 'len' field if necessary. The jited flag also allows for having
alternative interpreter functions running as currently, we can only
detect jit compiled filters by testing fp->bpf_func to not equal the
address of sk_run_filter().
Joint work with Alexei Starovoitov.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The packet hash can be considered a property of the packet, not just
on RX path.
This patch changes name of rxhash and l4_rxhash skbuff fields to be
hash and l4_hash respectively. This includes changing uses of the
field in the code which don't call the access functions.
Signed-off-by: Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The s390 bpf jit compiler emits the signed divide instructions "dr" and "d"
for unsigned divisions.
This can cause problems: the dividend will be zero extended to a 64 bit value
and the divisor is the 32 bit signed value as specified A or X accumulator,
even though A and X are supposed to be treated as unsigned values.
The divide instrunctions will generate an exception if the result cannot be
expressed with a 32 bit signed value.
This is the case if e.g. the dividend is 0xffffffff and the divisor either 1
or also 0xffffffff (signed: -1).
To avoid all these issues simply use unsigned divide instructions.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
At first Jakub Zawadzki noticed that some divisions by reciprocal_divide
were not correct. (off by one in some cases)
http://www.wireshark.org/~darkjames/reciprocal-buggy.c
He could also show this with BPF:
http://www.wireshark.org/~darkjames/set-and-dump-filter-k-bug.c
The reciprocal divide in linux kernel is not generic enough,
lets remove its use in BPF, as it is not worth the pain with
current cpus.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reported-by: Jakub Zawadzki <darkjames-ws@darkjames.pl>
Cc: Mircea Gherzan <mgherzan@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dxchgb@gmail.com>
Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Cc: Matt Evans <matt@ozlabs.org>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The prolog of functions generated by the bpf jit compiler uses an
instruction sequence with an "ahi" instruction to create stack space
instead of using an "aghi" instruction. Using the 32-bit "ahi" is not
wrong as the stack we are operating on is an order-4 allocation which
is always aligned to 16KB. But it is more consistent to use an "aghi"
as the stack pointer is a 64-bit value.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Now that the in-kernel disassembler has an own header file move the
disassembler related function prototypes to that header file.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
This is the s390 variant of 314beb9b "x86: bpf_jit_comp: secure bpf
jit against spraying attacks".
With this change the whole jit code and literal pool will be write
protected after creation. In addition the start address of the jit
code won't be always on a page boundary anymore.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
This is the s390 backend of 79617801 "filter: bpf_jit_comp: refactor
and unify BPF JIT image dump output".
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
The workqueue workaround is no longer needed. Same as 5199dfe531
"sparc: bpf_jit_comp: can call module_free() from any context".
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
s390 version of 855ddb56 "x86: bpf_jit_comp: add vlan tag support".
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Add support for XOR instruction for use with X/K.
s390 JIT support for the new BPF_S_ALU_XOR_* instructions introduced
with 9e49e889 "filter: add XOR instruction for use with X/K".
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Add support for MOD operation for s390's JIT.
Same as 280050cc "x86 bpf_jit: support MOD operation" for x86 which
adds JIT support for the generic new MOD operation introduced with
b6069a9570 "filter: add MOD operation".
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Add support for new BPF_S_ANC_ALU_XOR_X instruction which got added
with ffe06c17 "filter: add XOR operation".
s390 version of 4bfaddf1 "x86 bpf_jit: support BPF_S_ANC_ALU_XOR_X instruction".
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Make use of new immediate instructions that came with the
extended immediate and general instruction extension facilities.
Reviewed-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
The s390 implementation of the JIT compiler for packet filter speedup.
Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Michael Holzheu