Also extract drm_auth.h for nicer grouping.
v2: Nuke the other comments since they don't really explain a lot, and
within the drm core we generally only document functions exported to
drivers: The main audience for these docs are driver writers.
v3: Limit the exposure of drm_master internals by only including
drm_auth.h where it is neede (Chris).
v4: Spelling polish (Emil).
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
We already have a fallback in place to fill out the unique from
dev->unique, which is set to something reasonable in drm_dev_alloc.
Which means we only need to have a special set_busid for pci devices,
to be able to care the backwards compat code for drm 1.1 around, which
libdrm still needs.
While developing and testing this patch things blew up in really
interesting ways, and the code is rather confusing in naming things
between the kernel code, ioctl #defines and libdrm. For the next brave
dragon slayer, document all this madness properly in the userspace
interface section of gpu.tmpl.
v2: Make drm_dev_set_unique static and update kerneldoc.
v3: Entire rewrite, plus document what's going on for posterity in the
gpu docbook uapi section.
v4: Drop accidental amdgpu hunk (Emil).
v5: Drop accidental omapdrm vblank counter change (Emil).
v6: Rebase on top of the sphinx conversion.
Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Cc: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk> (virt_gpu)
Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
While splitting the document up, the headings "shifted" from what pandoc
generated. Use the following order for headings for consistency:
==============
Document title
==============
First
=====
Second
------
Third
~~~~~
Leave the lower level headings as they are; I think those are less
important. Although RST doesn't mandate a specific order ("Rather than
imposing a fixed number and order of section title adornment styles, the
order enforced will be the order as encountered."), having the higher
levels the same overall makes it easier to follow the documents.
[I'm sort of kind of writing the recommendation for docs-next in the
mean time, but this order seems sensible, and is what I'm proposing.]
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/126f42734defac6cbb8496a481d58db7b38461dd.1466506505.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
