Since usb phy core has added common code to register or unregister
extcon device, then phy-qcom-8x16-usb driver does not need its own
code to register/unregister extcon device, then remove them.
Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>
This patch uses the resource-managed extcon API for extcon_register_notifier()
and replaces the deprecated extcon API as following:
- extcon_get_cable_state_() -> extcon_get_state()
Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>
coccicheck found this pattern which could be
converted to PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(). No functional
changes.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>
gcc warns about the use of regulators in phy_8x16_probe:
drivers/usb/phy/phy-qcom-8x16-usb.c: In function 'phy_8x16_probe':
drivers/usb/phy/phy-qcom-8x16-usb.c:284:13: error: 'regs[0].consumer' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
drivers/usb/phy/phy-qcom-8x16-usb.c:285:13: error: 'regs[1].consumer' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
drivers/usb/phy/phy-qcom-8x16-usb.c:286:12: error: 'regs[2].consumer' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
According to Mark Brown, this is the result of various abuses
of the PHY interfaces [1], so let's fix the driver instead.
This puts the regulator bulk data into the device structure so it
gets properly initialized and lets us call regulator_bulk_enable()
and regulator_bulk_disable() rather than open-coding them.
Setting the voltages the way the driver does is rather pointless
because for each regulator there is only one valid voltage
range, so that can just get set up in the DT. As there doesn't
seem to be any user of the newly added driver yet, we can simply
make sure the DTs are setting this up right when they get added.
I'm also fixing the handling of regulator_bulk_enable() failure.
Right now, the driver just ignores any failure, which doesn't make
sense, so I'm changing it to loudly complain (in case we actually
had a bug here) and error out.
Doing a fly-by review of the driver, I notice a couple of other
problems that I'm not addressing here:
- It really should not have been written as a USB PHY driver, but
instead should use the PHY subsystem.
- The DT compatible string does not follow the usual conventions,
and it should have a proper identifier in it rather than a wildcard.
- The example in the devicetree binding lists a register address
that is the same as the actual EHCI host controller in the SoC
as well as the otg-snps and the ci-hdrc device, which indicates
that these are probably not even distinct devices (or all but
one of them are wrong), and if more than one of them tries to
request the resources correctly, they fail.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/1/26/267
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>
[un]register_interest and reading cable state by
name have been deprecated. Switch to new API.
Signed-off-by: Ivan T. Ivanov <ivan.ivanov@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Driver handles PHY initialization, clock management, power
management and workarounds required after resetting the hardware.
Signed-off-by: Ivan T. Ivanov <ivan.ivanov@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Baolin Wang