memory malloced in bch_cached_dev_run() and should be freed before
leaving from the error handling cases, otherwise it will cause
memory leak.
Fixes: 0b13efecf5 ("bcache: add return value check to bch_cached_dev_run()")
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Now we have counters for how many times jouranl is reclaimed, how many
times cached dirty btree nodes are flushed, but we don't know how many
jouranl buckets are really reclaimed.
This patch adds reclaimed_journal_buckets into struct cache_set, this
is an increasing only counter, to tell how many journal buckets are
reclaimed since cache set runs. From all these three counters (reclaim,
reclaimed_journal_buckets, flush_write), we can have idea how well
current journal space reclaim code works.
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
This patch improves performance for btree_flush_write() in following
ways,
- Use another spinlock journal.flush_write_lock to replace the very
hot journal.lock. We don't have to use journal.lock here, selecting
candidate btree nodes takes a lot of time, hold journal.lock here will
block other jouranling threads and drop the overall I/O performance.
- Only select flushing btree node from c->btree_cache list. When the
machine has a large system memory, mca cache may have a huge number of
cached btree nodes. Iterating all the cached nodes will take a lot
of CPU time, and most of the nodes on c->btree_cache_freeable and
c->btree_cache_freed lists are cleared and have need to flush. So only
travel mca list c->btree_cache to select flushing btree node should be
enough for most of the cases.
- Don't iterate whole c->btree_cache list, only reversely select first
BTREE_FLUSH_NR btree nodes to flush. Iterate all btree nodes from
c->btree_cache and select the oldest journal pin btree nodes consumes
huge number of CPU cycles if the list is huge (push and pop a node
into/out of a heap is expensive). The last several dirty btree nodes
on the tail of c->btree_cache list are earlest allocated and cached
btree nodes, they are relative to the oldest journal pin btree nodes.
Therefore only flushing BTREE_FLUSH_NR btree nodes from tail of
c->btree_cache probably includes the oldest journal pin btree nodes.
In my testing, the above change decreases 50%+ CPU consumption when
journal space is full. Some times IOPS drops to 0 for 5-8 seconds,
comparing blocking I/O for 120+ seconds in previous code, this is much
better. Maybe there is room to improve in future, but at this momment
the fix looks fine and performs well in my testing.
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
There is a race between mca_reap(), btree_node_free() and journal code
btree_flush_write(), which results very rare and strange deadlock or
panic and are very hard to reproduce.
Let me explain how the race happens. In btree_flush_write() one btree
node with oldest journal pin is selected, then it is flushed to cache
device, the select-and-flush is a two steps operation. Between these two
steps, there are something may happen inside the race window,
- The selected btree node was reaped by mca_reap() and allocated to
other requesters for other btree node.
- The slected btree node was selected, flushed and released by mca
shrink callback bch_mca_scan().
When btree_flush_write() tries to flush the selected btree node, firstly
b->write_lock is held by mutex_lock(). If the race happens and the
memory of selected btree node is allocated to other btree node, if that
btree node's write_lock is held already, a deadlock very probably
happens here. A worse case is the memory of the selected btree node is
released, then all references to this btree node (e.g. b->write_lock)
will trigger NULL pointer deference panic.
This race was introduced in commit cafe563591 ("bcache: A block layer
cache"), and enlarged by commit c4dc2497d5 ("bcache: fix high CPU
occupancy during journal"), which selected 128 btree nodes and flushed
them one-by-one in a quite long time period.
Such race is not easy to reproduce before. On a Lenovo SR650 server with
48 Xeon cores, and configure 1 NVMe SSD as cache device, a MD raid0
device assembled by 3 NVMe SSDs as backing device, this race can be
observed around every 10,000 times btree_flush_write() gets called. Both
deadlock and kernel panic all happened as aftermath of the race.
The idea of the fix is to add a btree flag BTREE_NODE_journal_flush. It
is set when selecting btree nodes, and cleared after btree nodes
flushed. Then when mca_reap() selects a btree node with this bit set,
this btree node will be skipped. Since mca_reap() only reaps btree node
without BTREE_NODE_journal_flush flag, such race is avoided.
Once corner case should be noticed, that is btree_node_free(). It might
be called in some error handling code path. For example the following
code piece from btree_split(),
2149 err_free2:
2150 bkey_put(b->c, &n2->key);
2151 btree_node_free(n2);
2152 rw_unlock(true, n2);
2153 err_free1:
2154 bkey_put(b->c, &n1->key);
2155 btree_node_free(n1);
2156 rw_unlock(true, n1);
At line 2151 and 2155, the btree node n2 and n1 are released without
mac_reap(), so BTREE_NODE_journal_flush also needs to be checked here.
If btree_node_free() is called directly in such error handling path,
and the selected btree node has BTREE_NODE_journal_flush bit set, just
delay for 1 us and retry again. In this case this btree node won't
be skipped, just retry until the BTREE_NODE_journal_flush bit cleared,
and free the btree node memory.
Fixes: cafe563591 ("bcache: A block layer cache")
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Reported-and-tested-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
In struct cache_set, retry_flush_write is added for commit c4dc2497d5
("bcache: fix high CPU occupancy during journal") which is reverted in
previous patch.
Now it is useless anymore, and this patch removes it from bcache code.
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
When accessing or modifying BTREE_NODE_dirty bit, it is not always
necessary to acquire b->write_lock. In bch_btree_cache_free() and
mca_reap() acquiring b->write_lock is necessary, and this patch adds
comments to explain why mutex_lock(&b->write_lock) is necessary for
checking or clearing BTREE_NODE_dirty bit there.
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
In bch_btree_cache_free() and btree_node_free(), BTREE_NODE_dirty is
always set no matter btree node is dirty or not. The code looks like
this,
if (btree_node_dirty(b))
btree_complete_write(b, btree_current_write(b));
clear_bit(BTREE_NODE_dirty, &b->flags);
Indeed if btree_node_dirty(b) returns false, it means BTREE_NODE_dirty
bit is cleared, then it is unnecessary to clear the bit again.
This patch only clears BTREE_NODE_dirty when btree_node_dirty(b) is
true (the bit is set), to save a few CPU cycles.
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
This reverts commit c4dc2497d5.
This patch enlarges a race between normal btree flush code path and
flush_btree_write(), which causes deadlock when journal space is
exhausted. Reverts this patch makes the race window from 128 btree
nodes to only 1 btree nodes.
Fixes: c4dc2497d5 ("bcache: fix high CPU occupancy during journal")
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tang Junhui <tang.junhui.linux@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
This reverts commit 6268dc2c47.
This patch depends on commit c4dc2497d5 ("bcache: fix high CPU
occupancy during journal") which is reverted in previous patch. So
revert this one too.
Fixes: 6268dc2c47 ("bcache: free heap cache_set->flush_btree in bch_journal_free")
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Shenghui Wang <shhuiw@foxmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
When cache set starts, bch_btree_check() will check all bkeys on cache
device by calculating the checksum. This operation will consume a huge
number of system memory if there are a lot of data cached. Since bcache
uses its own mca cache to maintain all its read-in btree nodes, and only
releases the cache space when system memory manage code starts to shrink
caches. Then before memory manager code to call the mca cache shrinker
callback, bcache mca cache will compete memory resource with user space
application, which may have nagive effect to performance of user space
workloads (e.g. data base, or I/O service of distributed storage node).
This patch tries to call bcache mca shrinker routine to proactively
release mca cache memory, to decrease the memory pressure of system and
avoid negative effort of the overall system I/O performance.
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
In journal_read_bucket() when setting ja->seq[bucket_index], there might
be potential case that a later non-maximum overwrites a better sequence
number to ja->seq[bucket_index]. This patch adds a check to make sure
that ja->seq[bucket_index] will be only set a new value if it is bigger
then current value.
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
This patch adds more code comments in journal_read_bucket(), this is an
effort to make the code to be more understandable.
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
When enable lockdep and reboot system with a writeback mode bcache
device, the following potential deadlock warning is reported by lockdep
engine.
[ 101.536569][ T401] kworker/2:2/401 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 101.538575][ T401] 00000000bbf6e6c7 ((wq_completion)bcache_writeback_wq){+.+.}, at: flush_workqueue+0x87/0x4c0
[ 101.542054][ T401]
[ 101.542054][ T401] but task is already holding lock:
[ 101.544587][ T401] 00000000f5f305b3 ((work_completion)(&cl->work)#2){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x21e/0x640
[ 101.548386][ T401]
[ 101.548386][ T401] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 101.548386][ T401]
[ 101.551874][ T401]
[ 101.551874][ T401] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 101.555000][ T401]
[ 101.555000][ T401] -> #1 ((work_completion)(&cl->work)#2){+.+.}:
[ 101.557860][ T401] process_one_work+0x277/0x640
[ 101.559661][ T401] worker_thread+0x39/0x3f0
[ 101.561340][ T401] kthread+0x125/0x140
[ 101.562963][ T401] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
[ 101.564718][ T401]
[ 101.564718][ T401] -> #0 ((wq_completion)bcache_writeback_wq){+.+.}:
[ 101.567701][ T401] lock_acquire+0xb4/0x1c0
[ 101.569651][ T401] flush_workqueue+0xae/0x4c0
[ 101.571494][ T401] drain_workqueue+0xa9/0x180
[ 101.573234][ T401] destroy_workqueue+0x17/0x250
[ 101.575109][ T401] cached_dev_free+0x44/0x120 [bcache]
[ 101.577304][ T401] process_one_work+0x2a4/0x640
[ 101.579357][ T401] worker_thread+0x39/0x3f0
[ 101.581055][ T401] kthread+0x125/0x140
[ 101.582709][ T401] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
[ 101.584592][ T401]
[ 101.584592][ T401] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 101.584592][ T401]
[ 101.588355][ T401] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 101.588355][ T401]
[ 101.590974][ T401] CPU0 CPU1
[ 101.592889][ T401] ---- ----
[ 101.594743][ T401] lock((work_completion)(&cl->work)#2);
[ 101.596785][ T401] lock((wq_completion)bcache_writeback_wq);
[ 101.600072][ T401] lock((work_completion)(&cl->work)#2);
[ 101.602971][ T401] lock((wq_completion)bcache_writeback_wq);
[ 101.605255][ T401]
[ 101.605255][ T401] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 101.605255][ T401]
[ 101.608310][ T401] 2 locks held by kworker/2:2/401:
[ 101.610208][ T401] #0: 00000000cf2c7d17 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x21e/0x640
[ 101.613709][ T401] #1: 00000000f5f305b3 ((work_completion)(&cl->work)#2){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x21e/0x640
[ 101.617480][ T401]
[ 101.617480][ T401] stack backtrace:
[ 101.619539][ T401] CPU: 2 PID: 401 Comm: kworker/2:2 Tainted: G W 5.2.0-rc4-lp151.20-default+ #1
[ 101.623225][ T401] Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS 6.00 04/13/2018
[ 101.627210][ T401] Workqueue: events cached_dev_free [bcache]
[ 101.629239][ T401] Call Trace:
[ 101.630360][ T401] dump_stack+0x85/0xcb
[ 101.631777][ T401] print_circular_bug+0x19a/0x1f0
[ 101.633485][ T401] __lock_acquire+0x16cd/0x1850
[ 101.635184][ T401] ? __lock_acquire+0x6a8/0x1850
[ 101.636863][ T401] ? lock_acquire+0xb4/0x1c0
[ 101.638421][ T401] ? find_held_lock+0x34/0xa0
[ 101.640015][ T401] lock_acquire+0xb4/0x1c0
[ 101.641513][ T401] ? flush_workqueue+0x87/0x4c0
[ 101.643248][ T401] flush_workqueue+0xae/0x4c0
[ 101.644832][ T401] ? flush_workqueue+0x87/0x4c0
[ 101.646476][ T401] ? drain_workqueue+0xa9/0x180
[ 101.648303][ T401] drain_workqueue+0xa9/0x180
[ 101.649867][ T401] destroy_workqueue+0x17/0x250
[ 101.651503][ T401] cached_dev_free+0x44/0x120 [bcache]
[ 101.653328][ T401] process_one_work+0x2a4/0x640
[ 101.655029][ T401] worker_thread+0x39/0x3f0
[ 101.656693][ T401] ? process_one_work+0x640/0x640
[ 101.658501][ T401] kthread+0x125/0x140
[ 101.660012][ T401] ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x70/0x70
[ 101.661985][ T401] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
[ 101.691318][ T401] bcache: bcache_device_free() bcache0 stopped
Here is how the above potential deadlock may happen in reboot/shutdown
code path,
1) bcache_reboot() is called firstly in the reboot/shutdown code path,
then in bcache_reboot(), bcache_device_stop() is called.
2) bcache_device_stop() sets BCACHE_DEV_CLOSING on d->falgs, then call
closure_queue(&d->cl) to invoke cached_dev_flush(). And in turn
cached_dev_flush() calls cached_dev_free() via closure_at()
3) In cached_dev_free(), after stopped writebach kthread
dc->writeback_thread, the kwork dc->writeback_write_wq is stopping by
destroy_workqueue().
4) Inside destroy_workqueue(), drain_workqueue() is called. Inside
drain_workqueue(), flush_workqueue() is called. Then wq->lockdep_map
is acquired by lock_map_acquire() in flush_workqueue(). After the
lock acquired the rest part of flush_workqueue() just wait for the
workqueue to complete.
5) Now we look back at writeback thread routine bch_writeback_thread(),
in the main while-loop, write_dirty() is called via continue_at() in
read_dirty_submit(), which is called via continue_at() in while-loop
level called function read_dirty(). Inside write_dirty() it may be
re-called on workqueeu dc->writeback_write_wq via continue_at().
It means when the writeback kthread is stopped in cached_dev_free()
there might be still one kworker queued on dc->writeback_write_wq
to execute write_dirty() again.
6) Now this kworker is scheduled on dc->writeback_write_wq to run by
process_one_work() (which is called by worker_thread()). Before
calling the kwork routine, wq->lockdep_map is acquired.
7) But wq->lockdep_map is acquired already in step 4), so a A-A lock
(lockdep terminology) scenario happens.
Indeed on multiple cores syatem, the above deadlock is very rare to
happen, just as the code comments in process_one_work() says,
2263 * AFAICT there is no possible deadlock scenario between the
2264 * flush_work() and complete() primitives (except for
single-threaded
2265 * workqueues), so hiding them isn't a problem.
But it is still good to fix such lockdep warning, even no one running
bcache on single core system.
The fix is simple. This patch solves the above potential deadlock by,
- Do not destroy workqueue dc->writeback_write_wq in cached_dev_free().
- Flush and destroy dc->writeback_write_wq in writebach kthread routine
bch_writeback_thread(), where after quit the thread main while-loop
and before cached_dev_put() is called.
By this fix, dc->writeback_write_wq will be stopped and destroy before
the writeback kthread stopped, so the chance for a A-A locking on
wq->lockdep_map is disappeared, such A-A deadlock won't happen
any more.
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
When enable lockdep engine, a lockdep warning can be observed when
reboot or shutdown system,
[ 3142.764557][ T1] bcache: bcache_reboot() Stopping all devices:
[ 3142.776265][ T2649]
[ 3142.777159][ T2649] ======================================================
[ 3142.780039][ T2649] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[ 3142.782869][ T2649] 5.2.0-rc4-lp151.20-default+ #1 Tainted: G W
[ 3142.785684][ T2649] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 3142.788479][ T2649] kworker/3:67/2649 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 3142.790738][ T2649] 00000000aaf02291 ((wq_completion)bcache_writeback_wq){+.+.}, at: flush_workqueue+0x87/0x4c0
[ 3142.794678][ T2649]
[ 3142.794678][ T2649] but task is already holding lock:
[ 3142.797402][ T2649] 000000004fcf89c5 (&bch_register_lock){+.+.}, at: cached_dev_free+0x17/0x120 [bcache]
[ 3142.801462][ T2649]
[ 3142.801462][ T2649] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 3142.801462][ T2649]
[ 3142.805277][ T2649]
[ 3142.805277][ T2649] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 3142.808902][ T2649]
[ 3142.808902][ T2649] -> #2 (&bch_register_lock){+.+.}:
[ 3142.812396][ T2649] __mutex_lock+0x7a/0x9d0
[ 3142.814184][ T2649] cached_dev_free+0x17/0x120 [bcache]
[ 3142.816415][ T2649] process_one_work+0x2a4/0x640
[ 3142.818413][ T2649] worker_thread+0x39/0x3f0
[ 3142.820276][ T2649] kthread+0x125/0x140
[ 3142.822061][ T2649] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
[ 3142.823965][ T2649]
[ 3142.823965][ T2649] -> #1 ((work_completion)(&cl->work)#2){+.+.}:
[ 3142.827244][ T2649] process_one_work+0x277/0x640
[ 3142.829160][ T2649] worker_thread+0x39/0x3f0
[ 3142.830958][ T2649] kthread+0x125/0x140
[ 3142.832674][ T2649] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
[ 3142.834915][ T2649]
[ 3142.834915][ T2649] -> #0 ((wq_completion)bcache_writeback_wq){+.+.}:
[ 3142.838121][ T2649] lock_acquire+0xb4/0x1c0
[ 3142.840025][ T2649] flush_workqueue+0xae/0x4c0
[ 3142.842035][ T2649] drain_workqueue+0xa9/0x180
[ 3142.844042][ T2649] destroy_workqueue+0x17/0x250
[ 3142.846142][ T2649] cached_dev_free+0x52/0x120 [bcache]
[ 3142.848530][ T2649] process_one_work+0x2a4/0x640
[ 3142.850663][ T2649] worker_thread+0x39/0x3f0
[ 3142.852464][ T2649] kthread+0x125/0x140
[ 3142.854106][ T2649] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
[ 3142.855880][ T2649]
[ 3142.855880][ T2649] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 3142.855880][ T2649]
[ 3142.859663][ T2649] Chain exists of:
[ 3142.859663][ T2649] (wq_completion)bcache_writeback_wq --> (work_completion)(&cl->work)#2 --> &bch_register_lock
[ 3142.859663][ T2649]
[ 3142.865424][ T2649] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 3142.865424][ T2649]
[ 3142.868022][ T2649] CPU0 CPU1
[ 3142.869885][ T2649] ---- ----
[ 3142.871751][ T2649] lock(&bch_register_lock);
[ 3142.873379][ T2649] lock((work_completion)(&cl->work)#2);
[ 3142.876399][ T2649] lock(&bch_register_lock);
[ 3142.879727][ T2649] lock((wq_completion)bcache_writeback_wq);
[ 3142.882064][ T2649]
[ 3142.882064][ T2649] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 3142.882064][ T2649]
[ 3142.885060][ T2649] 3 locks held by kworker/3:67/2649:
[ 3142.887245][ T2649] #0: 00000000e774cdd0 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x21e/0x640
[ 3142.890815][ T2649] #1: 00000000f7df89da ((work_completion)(&cl->work)#2){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x21e/0x640
[ 3142.894884][ T2649] #2: 000000004fcf89c5 (&bch_register_lock){+.+.}, at: cached_dev_free+0x17/0x120 [bcache]
[ 3142.898797][ T2649]
[ 3142.898797][ T2649] stack backtrace:
[ 3142.900961][ T2649] CPU: 3 PID: 2649 Comm: kworker/3:67 Tainted: G W 5.2.0-rc4-lp151.20-default+ #1
[ 3142.904789][ T2649] Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS 6.00 04/13/2018
[ 3142.909168][ T2649] Workqueue: events cached_dev_free [bcache]
[ 3142.911422][ T2649] Call Trace:
[ 3142.912656][ T2649] dump_stack+0x85/0xcb
[ 3142.914181][ T2649] print_circular_bug+0x19a/0x1f0
[ 3142.916193][ T2649] __lock_acquire+0x16cd/0x1850
[ 3142.917936][ T2649] ? __lock_acquire+0x6a8/0x1850
[ 3142.919704][ T2649] ? lock_acquire+0xb4/0x1c0
[ 3142.921335][ T2649] ? find_held_lock+0x34/0xa0
[ 3142.923052][ T2649] lock_acquire+0xb4/0x1c0
[ 3142.924635][ T2649] ? flush_workqueue+0x87/0x4c0
[ 3142.926375][ T2649] flush_workqueue+0xae/0x4c0
[ 3142.928047][ T2649] ? flush_workqueue+0x87/0x4c0
[ 3142.929824][ T2649] ? drain_workqueue+0xa9/0x180
[ 3142.931686][ T2649] drain_workqueue+0xa9/0x180
[ 3142.933534][ T2649] destroy_workqueue+0x17/0x250
[ 3142.935787][ T2649] cached_dev_free+0x52/0x120 [bcache]
[ 3142.937795][ T2649] process_one_work+0x2a4/0x640
[ 3142.939803][ T2649] worker_thread+0x39/0x3f0
[ 3142.941487][ T2649] ? process_one_work+0x640/0x640
[ 3142.943389][ T2649] kthread+0x125/0x140
[ 3142.944894][ T2649] ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x70/0x70
[ 3142.947744][ T2649] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
[ 3142.970358][ T2649] bcache: bcache_device_free() bcache0 stopped
Here is how the deadlock happens.
1) bcache_reboot() calls bcache_device_stop(), then inside
bcache_device_stop() BCACHE_DEV_CLOSING bit is set on d->flags.
Then closure_queue(&d->cl) is called to invoke cached_dev_flush().
2) In cached_dev_flush(), cached_dev_free() is called by continu_at().
3) In cached_dev_free(), when stopping the writeback kthread of the
cached device by kthread_stop(), dc->writeback_thread will be waken
up to quite the kthread while-loop, then cached_dev_put() is called
in bch_writeback_thread().
4) Calling cached_dev_put() in writeback kthread may drop dc->count to
0, then dc->detach kworker is scheduled, which is initialized as
cached_dev_detach_finish().
5) Inside cached_dev_detach_finish(), the last line of code is to call
closure_put(&dc->disk.cl), which drops the last reference counter of
closrure dc->disk.cl, then the callback cached_dev_flush() gets
called.
Now cached_dev_flush() is called for second time in the code path, the
first time is in step 2). And again bch_register_lock will be acquired
again, and a A-A lock (lockdep terminology) is happening.
The root cause of the above A-A lock is in cached_dev_free(), mutex
bch_register_lock is held before stopping writeback kthread and other
kworkers. Fortunately now we have variable 'bcache_is_reboot', which may
prevent device registration or unregistration during reboot/shutdown
time, so it is unncessary to hold bch_register_lock such early now.
This is how this patch fixes the reboot/shutdown time A-A lock issue:
After moving mutex_lock(&bch_register_lock) to a later location where
before atomic_read(&dc->running) in cached_dev_free(), such A-A lock
problem can be solved without any reboot time registration race.
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Now there is variable bcache_is_reboot to prevent device register or
unregister during reboot, it is unncessary to still hold mutex lock
bch_register_lock before stopping writeback_rate_update kworker and
writeback kthread. And if the stopping kworker or kthread holding
bch_register_lock inside their routine (we used to have such problem
in writeback thread, thanks to Junhui Wang fixed it), it is very easy
to introduce deadlock during reboot/shutdown procedure.
Therefore in this patch, the location to acquire bch_register_lock is
moved to the location before calling calc_cached_dev_sectors(). Which
is later then original location in cached_dev_detach_finish().
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
It is quite frequently to observe deadlock in bcache_reboot() happens
and hang the system reboot process. The reason is, in bcache_reboot()
when calling bch_cache_set_stop() and bcache_device_stop() the mutex
bch_register_lock is held. But in the process to stop cache set and
bcache device, bch_register_lock will be acquired again. If this mutex
is held here, deadlock will happen inside the stopping process. The
aftermath of the deadlock is, whole system reboot gets hung.
The fix is to avoid holding bch_register_lock for the following loops
in bcache_reboot(),
list_for_each_entry_safe(c, tc, &bch_cache_sets, list)
bch_cache_set_stop(c);
list_for_each_entry_safe(dc, tdc, &uncached_devices, list)
bcache_device_stop(&dc->disk);
A module range variable 'bcache_is_reboot' is added, it sets to true
in bcache_reboot(). In register_bcache(), if bcache_is_reboot is checked
to be true, reject the registration by returning -EBUSY immediately.
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
In bch_cached_dev_attach() after bch_cached_dev_writeback_start()
called, the wrireback kthread and writeback rate update kworker of the
cached device are created, if the following bch_cached_dev_run()
failed, bch_cached_dev_attach() will return with -ENOMEM without
stopping the writeback related kthread and kworker.
This patch stops writeback kthread and writeback rate update kworker
before returning -ENOMEM if bch_cached_dev_run() returns error.
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Commit 9baf30972b ("bcache: fix for gc and write-back race") added a
new work queue dc->writeback_write_wq, but forgot to destroy it in the
error condition when creating dc->writeback_thread failed.
This patch destroys dc->writeback_write_wq if kthread_create() returns
error pointer to dc->writeback_thread, then a memory leak is avoided.
Fixes: 9baf30972b ("bcache: fix for gc and write-back race")
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
In bch_cached_dev_files[] from driver/md/bcache/sysfs.c, sysfs_errors is
incorrectly inserted in. The correct entry should be sysfs_io_errors.
This patch fixes the problem and now I/O errors of cached device can be
read from /sys/block/bcache<N>/bcache/io_errors.
Fixes: c7b7bd0740 ("bcache: add io_disable to struct cached_dev")
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
If a bcache device is in dirty state and its cache set is not
registered, this bcache device will not appear in /dev/bcache<N>,
and there is no way to stop it or remove the bcache kernel module.
This is an as-designed behavior, but sometimes people has to reboot
whole system to release or stop the pending backing device.
This sysfs interface may remove such pending bcache devices when
write anything into the sysfs file manually.
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
The purpose of following code in bset_search_tree() is to avoid a branch
instruction,
994 if (likely(f->exponent != 127))
995 n = j * 2 + (((unsigned int)
996 (f->mantissa -
997 bfloat_mantissa(search, f))) >> 31);
998 else
999 n = (bkey_cmp(tree_to_bkey(t, j), search) > 0)
1000 ? j * 2
1001 : j * 2 + 1;
This piece of code is not very clear to understand, even when I tried to
add code comment for it, I made mistake. This patch removes the implict
bit operation and uses explicit branch to calculate next location in
binary tree search.
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
In previous bcache patches for Linux v5.2, the failure code path of
run_cache_set() is tested and fixed. So now the following comment
line can be removed from run_cache_set(),
/* XXX: test this, it's broken */
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
This patch adds more error message in bch_cached_dev_run() to indicate
the exact reason why an error value is returned. Please notice when
printing out the "is running already" message, pr_info() is used here,
because in this case also -EBUSY is returned, the bcache device can
continue to attach to the cache devince and run, so it won't be an
error level message in kernel message.
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
This patch adds more error message for attaching cached device, this is
helpful to debug code failure during bache device start up.
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
This patch adds more accurate error message for specific
ssyfs_create_link() call, to help debugging failure during
bcache device start tup.
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
When too many I/O errors happen on cache set and CACHE_SET_IO_DISABLE
bit is set, bch_journal() may continue to work because the journaling
bkey might be still in write set yet. The caller of bch_journal() may
believe the journal still work but the truth is in-memory journal write
set won't be written into cache device any more. This behavior may
introduce potential inconsistent metadata status.
This patch checks CACHE_SET_IO_DISABLE bit at the head of bch_journal(),
if the bit is set, bch_journal() returns NULL immediately to notice
caller to know journal does not work.
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
If CACHE_SET_IO_DISABLE of a cache set flag is set by too many I/O
errors, currently allocator routines can still continue allocate
space which may introduce inconsistent metadata state.
This patch checkes CACHE_SET_IO_DISABLE bit in following allocator
routines,
- bch_bucket_alloc()
- __bch_bucket_alloc_set()
Once CACHE_SET_IO_DISABLE is set on cache set, the allocator routines
may reject allocation request earlier to avoid potential inconsistent
metadata.
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Function bch_btree_keys_init() initializes b->set[].size and
b->set[].data to zero. As the code comments indicates, these code indeed
is unncessary, because both struct btree_keys and struct bset_tree are
nested embedded into struct btree, when struct btree is filled with 0
bits by kzalloc() in mca_bucket_alloc(), b->set[].size and
b->set[].data are initialized to 0 (a.k.a NULL) already.
This patch removes the redundant code, and add comments in
bch_btree_keys_init() and mca_bucket_alloc() to explain why it's safe.
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
This patch adds return value check to bch_cached_dev_run(), now if there
is error happens inside bch_cached_dev_run(), it can be catched.
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
The arrays (of strings) that are passed to __sysfs_match_string() are
static, so use sysfs_match_string() which does an implicit ARRAY_SIZE()
over these arrays.
Functionally, this doesn't change anything.
The change is more cosmetic.
It only shrinks the static arrays by 1 byte each.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
In function bset_search_tree(), when p >= t->size, t->tree[0] will be
prefetched by the following code piece,
974 unsigned int p = n << 4;
975
976 p &= ((int) (p - t->size)) >> 31;
977
978 prefetch(&t->tree[p]);
The purpose of the above code is to avoid a branch instruction, but
when p >= t->size, prefetch(&t->tree[0]) has no positive performance
contribution at all. This patch avoids the unncessary prefetch by only
calling prefetch() when p < t->size.
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
When backing device super block is written by bch_write_bdev_super(),
the bio complete callback write_bdev_super_endio() simply ignores I/O
status. Indeed such write request also contribute to backing device
health status if the request failed.
This patch checkes bio->bi_status in write_bdev_super_endio(), if there
is error, bch_count_backing_io_errors() will be called to count an I/O
error to dc->io_errors.
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
When md raid device (e.g. raid456) is used as backing device, read-ahead
requests on a degrading and recovering md raid device might be failured
immediately by md raid code, but indeed this md raid array can still be
read or write for normal I/O requests. Therefore such failed read-ahead
request are not real hardware failure. Further more, after degrading and
recovering accomplished, read-ahead requests will be handled by md raid
array again.
For such condition, I/O failures of read-ahead requests don't indicate
real health status (because normal I/O still be served), they should not
be counted into I/O error counter dc->io_errors.
Since there is no simple way to detect whether the backing divice is a
md raid device, this patch simply ignores I/O failures for read-ahead
bios on backing device, to avoid bogus backing device failure on a
degrading md raid array.
Suggested-and-tested-by: Thorsten Knabe <linux@thorsten-knabe.de>
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
When cache_set_flush() is called for too many I/O errors detected on
cache device and the cache set is retiring, inside the function it
doesn't make sense to flushing cached btree nodes from c->btree_cache
because CACHE_SET_IO_DISABLE is set on c->flags already and all I/Os
onto cache device will be rejected.
This patch checks in cache_set_flush() that whether CACHE_SET_IO_DISABLE
is set. If yes, then avoids to flush the cached btree nodes to reduce
more time and make cache set retiring more faster.
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
This reverts commit 6147305c73.
Although this patch helps the failed bcache device to stop faster when
too many I/O errors detected on corresponding cached device, setting
CACHE_SET_IO_DISABLE bit to cache set c->flags was not a good idea. This
operation will disable all I/Os on cache set, which means other attached
bcache devices won't work neither.
Without this patch, the failed bcache device can also be stopped
eventually if internal I/O accomplished (e.g. writeback). Therefore here
I revert it.
Fixes: 6147305c73 ("bcache: set CACHE_SET_IO_DISABLE in bch_cached_dev_error()")
Reported-by: Yong Li <mr.liyong@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
When everything is OK in bch_journal_read(), finally the return value
is returned by,
return ret;
which assumes ret will be 0 here. This assumption is wrong when all
journal buckets as are full and filled with valid journal entries. In
such cache the last location referencess read_bucket() sets 'ret' to
1, which means new jset added into jset list. The jset list is list
'journal' in caller run_cache_set().
Return 1 to run_cache_set() means something wrong and the cache set
won't start, but indeed everything is OK.
This patch changes the line at end of bch_journal_read() to directly
return 0 since everything if verything is good. Then a bogus error
is fixed.
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
When gc is running, user space I/O processes may wait inside
bcache code, so no new I/O coming. Indeed this is not a real idle
time, maximum writeback rate should not be set in such situation.
Otherwise a faster writeback thread may compete locks with gc thread
and makes garbage collection slower, which results a longer I/O
freeze period.
This patch checks c->gc_mark_valid in set_at_max_writeback_rate(). If
c->gc_mark_valid is 0 (gc running), set_at_max_writeback_rate() returns
false, then update_writeback_rate() will not set writeback rate to
maximum value even c->idle_counter reaches an idle threshold.
Now writeback thread won't interfere gc thread performance.
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
When people set a writeback percent via sysfs file,
/sys/block/bcache<N>/bcache/writeback_percent
current code directly sets BCACHE_DEV_WB_RUNNING to dc->disk.flags
and schedules kworker dc->writeback_rate_update.
If there is no cache set attached to, the writeback kernel thread is
not running indeed, running dc->writeback_rate_update does not make
sense and may cause NULL pointer deference when reference cache set
pointer inside update_writeback_rate().
This patch checks whether the cache set point (dc->disk.c) is NULL in
sysfs interface handler, and only set BCACHE_DEV_WB_RUNNING and
schedule dc->writeback_rate_update when dc->disk.c is not NULL (it
means the cache device is attached to a cache set).
This problem might be introduced from initial bcache commit, but
commit 3fd47bfe55 ("bcache: stop dc->writeback_rate_update properly")
changes part of the original code piece, so I add 'Fixes: 3fd47bfe55b0'
to indicate from which commit this patch can be applied.
Fixes: 3fd47bfe55 ("bcache: stop dc->writeback_rate_update properly")
Reported-by: Bjørn Forsman <bjorn.forsman@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Bjørn Forsman <bjorn.forsman@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Recently people report bcache code compiled with gcc9 is broken, one of
the buggy behavior I observe is that two adjacent 4KB I/Os should merge
into one but they don't. Finally it turns out to be a stack corruption
caused by macro PRECEDING_KEY().
See how PRECEDING_KEY() is defined in bset.h,
437 #define PRECEDING_KEY(_k) \
438 ({ \
439 struct bkey *_ret = NULL; \
440 \
441 if (KEY_INODE(_k) || KEY_OFFSET(_k)) { \
442 _ret = &KEY(KEY_INODE(_k), KEY_OFFSET(_k), 0); \
443 \
444 if (!_ret->low) \
445 _ret->high--; \
446 _ret->low--; \
447 } \
448 \
449 _ret; \
450 })
At line 442, _ret points to address of a on-stack variable combined by
KEY(), the life range of this on-stack variable is in line 442-446,
once _ret is returned to bch_btree_insert_key(), the returned address
points to an invalid stack address and this address is overwritten in
the following called bch_btree_iter_init(). Then argument 'search' of
bch_btree_iter_init() points to some address inside stackframe of
bch_btree_iter_init(), exact address depends on how the compiler
allocates stack space. Now the stack is corrupted.
Fixes: 0eacac2203 ("bcache: PRECEDING_KEY()")
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Rolf Fokkens <rolf@rolffokkens.nl>
Reviewed-by: Pierre JUHEN <pierre.juhen@orange.fr>
Tested-by: Shenghui Wang <shhuiw@foxmail.com>
Tested-by: Pierre JUHEN <pierre.juhen@orange.fr>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Cc: Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Add SPDX license identifiers to all Make/Kconfig files which:
- Have no license information of any form
These files fall under the project license, GPL v2 only. The resulting SPDX
license identifier is:
GPL-2.0-only
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
We only have two callers that need the integer loop iterator, and they
can easily maintain it themselves.
Suggested-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Acked-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Acked-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Use a variable containing the buffer address instead of the to be
removed integer iterator from bio_for_each_segment_all.
Suggested-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Acked-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Commit 95f18c9d13 ("bcache: avoid potential memleak of list of
journal_replay(s) in the CACHE_SYNC branch of run_cache_set") forgets
to remove the original define of LIST_HEAD(journal), which makes
the change no take effect. This patch removes redundant variable
LIST_HEAD(journal) from run_cache_set(), to make Shenghui's fix
working.
Fixes: 95f18c9d13 ("bcache: avoid potential memleak of list of journal_replay(s) in the CACHE_SYNC branch of run_cache_set")
Reported-by: Juha Aatrokoski <juha.aatrokoski@aalto.fi>
Cc: Shenghui Wang <shhuiw@foxmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
In the CACHE_SYNC branch of run_cache_set(), LIST_HEAD(journal) is used
to collect journal_replay(s) and filled by bch_journal_read().
If all goes well, bch_journal_replay() will release the list of
jounal_replay(s) at the end of the branch.
If something goes wrong, code flow will jump to the label "err:" and leave
the list unreleased.
This patch will release the list of journal_replay(s) in the case of
error detected.
v1 -> v2:
* Move the release code to the location after label 'err:' to
simply the change.
Signed-off-by: Shenghui Wang <shhuiw@foxmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Elements of keylist should be accessed before the list is freed.
Move bch_keylist_free() calling after the while loop to avoid wrong
content accessed.
Signed-off-by: Shenghui Wang <shhuiw@foxmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
journal replay failed with messages:
Sep 10 19:10:43 ceph kernel: bcache: error on
bb379a64-e44e-4812-b91d-a5599871a3b1: bcache: journal entries
2057493-2057567 missing! (replaying 2057493-2076601), disabling
caching
The reason is in journal_reclaim(), when discard is enabled, we send
discard command and reclaim those journal buckets whose seq is old
than the last_seq_now, but before we write a journal with last_seq_now,
the machine is restarted, so the journal with the last_seq_now is not
written to the journal bucket, and the last_seq_wrote in the newest
journal is old than last_seq_now which we expect to be, so when we doing
replay, journals from last_seq_wrote to last_seq_now are missing.
It's hard to write a journal immediately after journal_reclaim(),
and it harmless if those missed journal are caused by discarding
since those journals are already wrote to btree node. So, if miss
seqs are started from the beginning journal, we treat it as normal,
and only print a message to show the miss journal, and point out
it maybe caused by discarding.
Patch v2 add a judgement condition to ignore the missed journal
only when discard enabled as Coly suggested.
(Coly Li: rebase the patch with other changes in bch_journal_replay())
Signed-off-by: Tang Junhui <tang.junhui.linux@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Dennis Schridde <devurandom@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
This patch tries to release mutex bch_register_lock early, to give
chance to stop cache set and bcache device early.
This patch also expends time out of stopping all bcache device from
2 seconds to 10 seconds, because stopping writeback rate update worker
may delay for 5 seconds, 2 seconds is not enough.
After this patch applied, stopping bcache devices during system reboot
or shutdown is very hard to be observed any more.
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
