When SCSI-2 they can support luns past 7 and sparse luns.
Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
This is from RHEL4. I do not have any info from our bugzilla. All
I could find was something like this thread
http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/1/7/346
Report lun for linux does not work. It may be our lun format code or
it may be the device. It is probably not worth it to add anything
special for this device, so the patch just adds BLIST_NOREPORTLUN.
Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
This is from RHEL4. This box can support
scsi2 and can also support BLIST_SPARSELUN | BLIST_LARGELUN.
Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
According to Anthony Cheung all HP XP arrays with "OPEN-"
types support REPORT_LUN. So there is no reason why we
shouldn't use it.
Signed-off-by: Anthony Cheung <anthony.cheung@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
after upgrading our SUN E250 from 2.4 to 2.6 I'm seeing following error
when the HP DDS4 DAT changer gets probed:
scsi: host 1 channel 0 id 5 lun16777216 has a LUN larger than allowed by
the host adapter
The device is connected to a symbios 875 host. I've talked to Willy
about the problem, and he asked me to try to blacklist the device
for reportlun. I did that with the patch below and it solved the
problem. It now gets properly detected:
target1:0:5: FAST-20 WIDE SCSI 40.0 MB/s ST (50 ns, offset 16)
Vendor: HP Model: C5713A Rev: H307
Type: Sequential-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 03
target1:0:5: Beginning Domain Validation
target1:0:5: FAST-20 SCSI 20.0 MB/s ST (50 ns, offset 16)
target1:0:5: FAST-20 WIDE SCSI 40.0 MB/s ST (50 ns, offset 16)
target1:0:5: Domain Validation skipping write tests
target1:0:5: Ending Domain Validation
Vendor: HP Model: C5713A Rev: H307
Type: Medium Changer ANSI SCSI revision: 03
Signed-off-by: tsbogend@alpha.franken.de
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Some versions of the IBM 2104-DU3 disk enclosure
have been observed to hang Inquiries to non zero
LUNs to the SES device. This device only has LUN 0,
so this patch adds it to the BLIST to prevent scsi
core from scanning beyond LUN 0.
Signed-off-by: Brian King <brking@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Conflicts:
include/scsi/scsi_devinfo.h
Same number for two BLIST flags: BLIST_MAX_512 and BLIST_ATTACH_PQ3
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Some devices report a peripheral qualifier of 3 for LUN 0; with the original
code, we would still try a REPORT_LUNS scan (if SCSI level is >= 3 or if we
have the BLIST_REPORTLUNS2 passed in), but NOT any sequential scan.
Also, the device at LUN 0 (which is not connected according to the PQ) is not
registered with the OS.
Unfortunately, SANs exist that are SCSI-2 and do NOT support REPORT_LUNS, but
report a unknown device with PQ 3 on LUN 0. We still need to scan them, and
most probably we even need BLIST_SPARSELUN (and BLIST_LARGELUN). See the bug
reference for an infamous example.
This is patch 3/3:
3. Implement the blacklist flag BLIST_ATTACH_PQ3 that makes the scsi
scanning code register PQ3 devices and continues scanning; only sg
will attach thanks to scsi_bus_match().
Signed-off-by: Kurt Garloff <garloff@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Original From: Ingo Flaschberger <if@xip.at>
To support the RA4100 array from Compaq.
This patch now correctly handles SCSI_UNKNOWN types with regard to
BLIST_REPORTLUNS2 (allow it) and cdb[1] LUN inclusion (don't).
It also allows a BLIST_MAX_512 flag to restrict the maximum transfer
length to 512 blocks (apparently this is an RA4100 problem).
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
This device spews total rubbish to a REPORT LUNS command, so avoid
sending it one.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Make the vendor, model and rev fields in scsi_device pointers to const
and update a few prototypes of functions using them.
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
The patch below should make the Pioneer DRM-624X automatically
be set up with all 6 "drives". (6 slot SCSI CD changer)
Signed-off-by: Karl Magnus Kolstø <karl.kolsto@uib.no>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
They report being SCSI-3 but seem to give back rubbish to a
REPORT_LUNS command. Force them to be sequentially scanned.
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 12:24:39AM +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> We tested 2.5.51 on a ppc64 box, qlogic 2312 and a fastt700 array. I
> had CONFIG_SCSI_REPORT_LUNS and unfortunately it thought the management
> LUN was a disk:
>
> Vendor: IBM Model: Universal Xport Rev: 0520
> Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 03
>
> ...
>
> SCSI device sdaj: drive cache: write through
> SCSI device sdaj: 40960 512-byte hdwr sectors (21 MB)
> sdaj: unknown partition table
> Attached scsi disk sdaj at scsi2, channel 0, id 0, lun 31
>
> ...
>
> end_request: I/O error, dev sdaj, sector 0
Three years later...
It looks like SGI use the same FC vendor and they already have a
workaround for this issue. The following patch adds the IBM version of
it.
Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
From: Steve Wilcox <spwilcox@att.com>
In order to properly report LUN's > 7, the DEC HSG80 definition in
scsi_devinfo.c needs to include BLIST_REPORTLUN2 rather than
BLIST_SPARSELUN. I've tested this change with several HSG firmware
revisions and with both Emulex and Qlogic HBA's.
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
When run on a kernel that scans all LUNs, a certain crappy
scsi scanner reports the same LUN over and over..
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=155457
Aparently they were so shamed by this, they chose to remain
anonymous. Though it seems the blacklist code handles
anonymous vendors just fine.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
Mike Christie