commit 5c6c13cd11 upstream.
The "mmio" writes into vgpu registers are simple memory traps from the
guest into the host. We do not need to assert in the guest that the
device is awake for the io as we do not write to the device itself.
However, over time we have refactored all the mmio accessors with the
result that the vgpu reuses the gen2 accessors and so inherits the
assert for runtime-pm of the native device. The assert though has
actually been there since commit 3be0bf5acc ("drm/i915: Create vGPU
specific MMIO operations to reduce traps").
References: 3be0bf5acc ("drm/i915: Create vGPU specific MMIO operations to reduce traps")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
Cc: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200811092532.13753-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 0e65ce24a3)
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Multiple uncore structures will share the debug infrastructure, so
move it to a common place and add extra locking around it.
Also, since we now have a separate object, it is cleaner to have
dedicated functions working on the object to stop and restart the
mmio debug. Apart from the cosmetic changes, this patch introduces
2 functional updates:
- All calls to check_for_unclaimed_mmio will now return false when
the debug is suspended, not just the ones that are active only when
i915_modparams.mmio_debug is set. If we don't trust the result of the
check while a user is doing mmio access then we shouldn't attempt the
check anywhere.
- i915_modparams.mmio_debug is not save/restored anymore around user
access. The value is now never touched by the kernel while debug is
disabled so no need for save/restore.
v2: squash mmio_debug patches, restrict mmio_debug lock usage (Chris)
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190809063116.7527-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Everything about the file is about display, and mostly about types
related to display. Move under display/ as intel_display_types.h to
reflect the facts.
There's still plenty to clean up, but start off with moving the file
where it logically belongs and naming according to contents.
v2: fix the include guard name in the renamed file
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190806113933.11799-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
With i915 added to i915_inject_probe_failure we can use dedicated
printk when injecting artificial load failure.
Also make this function look like other i915 functions that return
error code and make it more flexible to return any provided error
code instead of previously assumed -ENODEV.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190802184055.31988-2-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
This enables the Mesa driver to advertise support for ARB_timer_query,
and thus an OpenGL version higher than 3.2.
Based on the ICL patch by Paulo Zanoni and CNL patch by Nanley Chery.
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190726002412.5827-3-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Use the "_probe" nomenclature not only in i915_driver_probe() helper
name but also in other related function / variable names for
consistency. Only the userspace exposed name of a related module
parameter is left untouched.
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190712112429.740-4-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
Stop guessing over whether we have an extra wakeref held by the delayed
fw put, and track it explicitly for the sake of debug.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190708154914.26850-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Make no assumption that something in the background is not acquiring the
fw_domain -- but we still do not track owner so assume that any active
domain is intended by the caller.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190707151135.11700-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
The intent of the assert is to document that the caller took the
appropriate wakerefs for the function. However, as Tvrtko pointed out,
we simply check whether the fw_domains are active and may be confused by
the auto wakeref which may be dropped between the check and use. Let's
be more careful in the assert and check that each fw_domain has an
explicit caller wakeref above and beyond the automatic wakeref.
v2: Fix spelling for config DRM_I915_DEBUG_RUNTIME_PM
v3: Timer may still be active after we drop the autowakeref, we need to
check domain->active instead.
v4: The timer checks domain->active, but we still need to check the
timer. (This is starting to look weird...)
Reported-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190704102048.6436-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
With multiple uncore to initialize (GT vs Display), it makes little
sense to have the vgpu_check inside uncore_init(). We also have
a catch-22 scenario where the uncore is required to read the vgpu
capabilities while the vgpu capabilities are required to decide if
we need to initialize forcewake support. To remove this circular
dependency, we can perform the required MMIO access by mmapping just
the vgtif shared page in mmio space and use raw accessors.
v2: rename check_vgpu to detect_vgpu (Chris)
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190620010021.20637-7-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
We'd like to introduce a display uncore with no forcewake domains, so
let's avoid wasting memory and be ready to allocate only what we need.
Even without multiple uncore, we still don't need all the domains on all
gens.
v2: avoid hidden control flow, improve checks (Tvrtko), fix IVB special
case, add failure injection point
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190620010021.20637-6-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
We always call some of the setup/cleanup functions for forcewake, even
if the feature is not actually available. Skipping these operations if
forcewake is not available saves us some operations on older gens and
prepares us for having a forcewake-less display uncore.
v2: do not make suspend/resume functions forcewake-specific (Chris,
Tvrtko), use GEM_BUG_ON in internal forcewake-only functions (Tvrtko)
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190620010021.20637-5-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
Let's get rid of it before it proliferates, since with split GT/Display
uncores the container_of won't work anymore.
I've kept the rpm pointer as well to minimize the pointer chasing in the
MMIO accessors.
v2: swap parameter order for intel_uncore_init_early (Tvrtko)
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190620010021.20637-4-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
uncore_sanitize performs no action on the uncore structure and just
calls intel_sanitize_gt_powersave, so we can just call the latter
directly.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190620010021.20637-3-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
Instead of going through the if-else chain every time, let's save the
function in the uncore structure. Note that the new functions are
purposely not used from the reg read/write functions to keep the
inlining there.
While at it, use the new macro to call the old ones to clean the code a
bit.
v2: Rename macros for no-forcewake function assignment (Tvrtko)
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190620010021.20637-2-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
Matching the underlying get/put functions.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190613232156.34940-8-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
With this all the rpm assert-related functions consistently work on
the i915_runtime_pm structure
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190613232156.34940-4-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
Quite a few of the call points have already switched to the version
working directly on the runtime_pm structure, so let's switch over the
rest and kill the i915-based asserts.
v2: rebase
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190613232156.34940-3-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
If the HW fails to ack a change in forcewake status, the machine is as
good as dead -- it may recover, but in reality it missed the mmio
updates and is now in a very inconsistent state. If it happens, we can't
trust the CI results (or at least the fails may be genuine but due to
the HW being dead and not the actual test!) so reboot the machine (CI
checks for a kernel taint in between each test and reboots if the
machine is tainted).
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190508115245.27790-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
It used to be handy that we only had a couple of headers, but over time
intel_drv.h has become unwieldy. Extract declarations to a separate
header file corresponding to the implementation module, clarifying the
modularity of the driver.
Ensure the new header is self-contained, and do so with minimal further
includes, using forward declarations as needed. Include the new header
only where needed, and sort the modified include directives while at it
and as needed.
No functional changes.
v2: gen6_rps_reset_ei() is in i915_irq.c not intel_pm.c.
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/adc6463b95eef3440fba9826793f7d1c5f3b0b4a.1554461791.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Add "_mmio" postfix to be consistent from the init/fini phase they're
called from.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190402201032.15841-2-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
Encapsulate the uncore early init and be consistent with the
"_early" naming.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190402201032.15841-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
edram is not part of uncore and there is no requirement for the
detection to be done before we initialize the uncore functions. The
first check on HAS_EDRAM is in the ggtt_init path, so move it to
i915_driver_init_hw, where other dram-related detection happens.
While at it, save the size in MB instead of the capabilities because the
size is the only thing we look at outside of the init function.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190328174533.31532-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
A few advantages:
- Prepares us for the planned split of display uncore from GT uncore
- Improves our engine-centric view of the world in the engine code
and allows us to avoid jumping back to dev_priv.
- Allows us to wrap accesses to engine register in nice macros that
automatically pick the right mmio base.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190325214940.23632-10-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
The intel_uncore structure is the owner of register access, so
subclass the function to it.
While at it, use a local uncore var and switch to the new read/write
functions where it makes sense.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190325214940.23632-9-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
The intel_uncore structure is the owner of register access, so
subclass the function to it.
While at it, use a local uncore var and switch to the new read/write
functions where it makes sense.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190325214940.23632-8-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
The intel_uncore structure is the owner of FW, so subclass the
function to it.
While at it, use a local uncore var and switch to the new read/write
functions where it makes sense.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190325214940.23632-7-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
The full read/write ops can now work on the intel_uncore struct.
Introduce intel_uncore_read/write functions working on intel_uncore
and switch the I915_READ/WRITE macro to internally call those.
v2: no change
v3: add intel_uncore_read/write functions (Chris), update commit msg
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190325214940.23632-6-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
Save the HW capabilities to avoid having to jump back to dev_priv
every time.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190325214940.23632-4-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
We have several cases where we don't have forcewake (older gens, GVT and
planned display-only uncore), so, instead of checking every time against
the various condition, save the info in a flag and use that.
Note that this patch also change the behavior for gen5 with vpgu
enabled, but this is not an issue since we don't support vgpu on gen5.
v2: split out from previous path, fix check for missing case (Paulo)
v3: Inline helper for clarity in testing flags
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190325214940.23632-3-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
They now work on uncore, so use raw_uncore_ prefix. Also move them to
uncore.h
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190325214940.23632-2-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
This allows us to ditch i915 in some more places.
v2: use local var in check_vgpu (Paulo)
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190319183543.13679-9-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
This will allow futher simplifications in the uncore handling.
v2: move register access setup under uncore (Chris)
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190319183543.13679-8-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
Move the init, fini, prune, suspend, resume function to work on
intel_uncore instead of dev_priv.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190319183543.13679-5-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
Now that the internal code all works on intel_uncore, flip the
external-facing interface.
v2: fix GVT.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190319183543.13679-4-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
Get/put functions used outside of uncore.c are updated in the next
patch for a nicer split.
v2: use dev_priv where we still have it (Paulo)
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190319183543.13679-3-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
Upper bits are reserved on gen6, so no issue if we write them. Note that
we're already doing this in the non-MT case of IVB, which uses the same
register.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190320122732.14512-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
The only usage we have for it is for the regs pointer. Save a pointer to
the set and ack registers instead of the register offsets to remove this
requirement
v2: Keep passing uncore down to the lowest levels to avoid repeated
pointer chasing in the innermost loops:
add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 3/15 up/down: 33/-155 (-122)
Function old new delta
fw_domain_init 320 351 +31
hdmi_port_clock_valid 319 320 +1
g4x_pre_enable_dp 364 365 +1
ring_request_alloc 1852 1851 -1
intel_engine_lookup_user 50 49 -1
gen11_irq_handler 738 737 -1
__intel_uncore_forcewake_get 115 112 -3
intel_uncore_fw_release_timer 198 194 -4
i915_forcewake_domains 154 150 -4
fw_domain_fini 172 168 -4
__intel_uncore_forcewake_put 163 159 -4
___force_wake_auto 138 134 -4
fw_domains_put 98 92 -6
__err_print_to_sgl 4058 4052 -6
intel_uncore_forcewake_reset 459 444 -15
fw_domains_get 563 548 -15
fw_domain_wait_ack_with_fallback 490 450 -40
fw_domains_get_with_fallback 875 828 -47
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190313231319.711-2-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190316100045.20240-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
We generally omit register polling from the i915_reg_rw tracepoint.
Understandable since polling could generate a lot of noise in the
trace. The downside is that the trace is incomplete. As a compromise
let's trace the final register value observed while polling. That
should be generally sufficient to observe what the code should be
doing next.
I suppose in some cases it might make sense to also trace the initial
register value, and maybe the number of times we polled. But that
would require a separate tracepoint so let's leave it for the future.
The other users of _NOTRACE() are i915_pmu and i2c bitbanging,
which I decided to leave alone.
Next we should do something to claw back the tracepoints for
planes and whatnot which were switched to _FW() a while back.
I guess just new macros for raw_rw+trace. The question is
what to call it?
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190204211644.21967-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Frequently, we use intel_runtime_pm_get/_put around a small block.
Formalise that usage by providing a macro to define such a block with an
automatic closure to scope the intel_runtime_pm wakeref to that block,
i.e. macro abuse smelling of python.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190114142129.24398-15-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Keep track of the temporary rpm wakerefs used for user access to the
device, so that we can cancel them upon release and clearly identify any
leaks.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190114142129.24398-10-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Chris Wilson