Fix a limit condition of vlans on the interface before setting vlan
promiscuous mode
Fixes: 48dd73d08d ("net: aquantia: fix vlans not working over bridged network")
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Bogdanov <dmitry.bogdanov@aquantia.com>
Signed-off-by: Igor Russkikh <igor.russkikh@aquantia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Due to absence of checking against the rx flow rule when vlan 0 is being
removed, the other rule could be removed instead of the rule with vlan 0
Fixes: 7975d2aff5 ("net: aquantia: add support of rx-vlan-filter offload")
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Bogdanov <dmitry.bogdanov@aquantia.com>
Signed-off-by: Igor Russkikh <igor.russkikh@aquantia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The new route handling in ip_mc_finish_output() from 'net' overlapped
with the new support for returning congestion notifications from BPF
programs.
In order to handle this I had to take the dev_loopback_xmit() calls
out of the switch statement.
The aquantia driver conflicts were simple overlapping changes.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
It was noticed some files had -or-later, however overall driver has
-only license. Clean this up.
Signed-off-by: Igor Russkikh <igor.russkikh@aquantia.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
In configuration of vlan over bridge over aquantia device
it was found that vlan tagged traffic is dropped on chip.
The reason is that bridge device enables promisc mode,
but in atlantic chip vlan filters will still apply.
So we have to corellate promisc settings with vlan configuration.
The solution is to track in a separate state variable the
need of vlan forced promisc. And also consider generic
promisc configuration when doing vlan filter config.
Fixes: 7975d2aff5 ("net: aquantia: add support of rx-vlan-filter offload")
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Bogdanov <dmitry.bogdanov@aquantia.com>
Signed-off-by: Igor Russkikh <igor.russkikh@aquantia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
There is a spelling mistake in a netdev_err message. Fix this.
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Since it uses the same NIC table as rx flow vlan filter therefore
rx-flow vlan filter accepts only vlans that present on the interface
in case of rx-vlan-filter is on.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Bogdanov <dmitry.bogdanov@aquantia.com>
Signed-off-by: Igor Russkikh <igor.russkikh@aquantia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
L2 EtherType filters allows to filter packet by EtherType field or
both EtherType and User Priority (PCP) field of 802.1Q.
UserPriority (vlan) parameter must be accompanied by mask 0x1FFF. That
is to distinguish VLAN filter from L2 Ethertype filter with
UserPriority since both User Priority and VLAN ID are passed in the
same 'vlan' parameter.
Example:
To add a filter that directs IP4 packess of priority 3 to queue 3:
ethtool -N <ethX> flow-type ether proto 0x800 vlan 0x600 m 0x1FFF \
action 3 loc 16
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Bogdanov <dmitry.bogdanov@aquantia.com>
Signed-off-by: Igor Russkikh <igor.russkikh@aquantia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The VLAN filter (VLAN id) is compared against 16 filters.
VLAN id must be accompanied by mask 0xF000. That is to distinguish
VLAN filter from L2 Ethertype filter with UserPriority since both
User Priority and VLAN ID are passed in the same 'vlan' parameter.
Flow type may be any as it is not matched for VLAN filter.
Due to fixed order of the rules in the NIC, the location 0-15 are
reserved for vlan filters.
Example:
To add a rule that directs packets from VLAN 2001 to queue 5:
ethtool -N <ethX> flow-type ip4 vlan 2001 m 0xF000 action 5 loc 0
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Bogdanov <dmitry.bogdanov@aquantia.com>
Signed-off-by: Igor Russkikh <igor.russkikh@aquantia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Add support of L3/L4 5-tuple {protocol, src-ip, dst-ip, src-port, dst-port}
filters. Mask is not supported. Src-port and dst-port are only compared for
TCP/UDP/SCTP packets. Both IPv4 and IPv6 are supported.
The supported actions are the drop and the queue assignment.
Due to fixed order of the rules in the NIC, the location 32-39 are
reserved for L3/L4 5-tuple filters. The locations 32 and 36 are
reserved for IPv6 filters.
Examples:
sudo ethtool -N eth0 flow-type ip6 src-ip 2001:db8:0:f101::2 \
dst-ip 2001:db8:0:f101::5 action -1 loc 36
sudo ethtool -N eth0 flow-type udp4 src-ip 10.0.0.4 \
dst-ip 10.0.0.7 src-port 2000 dst-port 2001 action 2 loc 32
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Bogdanov <dmitry.bogdanov@aquantia.com>
Signed-off-by: Igor Russkikh <igor.russkikh@aquantia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Add infrastructure to support ntuple filter configuration.
Add rule, remove rule, reapply on interface up.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Bogdanov <dmitry.bogdanov@aquantia.com>
Signed-off-by: Igor Russkikh <igor.russkikh@aquantia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Dmitry Bogdanov