Commit graph

342 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Rafael J. Wysocki 7b98118aaa ACPI / hotplug: Consolidate deferred execution of ACPI hotplug routines
There are two different interfaces for queuing up work items on the
ACPI hotplug workqueue, alloc_acpi_hp_work() used by PCI and PCI host
bridge hotplug code and acpi_os_hotplug_execute() used by the common
ACPI hotplug code and docking stations.  They both are somewhat
cumbersome to use and work slightly differently.

The users of alloc_acpi_hp_work() have to submit a work function that
will extract the necessary data items from a struct acpi_hp_work
object allocated by alloc_acpi_hp_work() and then will free that
object, while it would be more straightforward to simply use a work
function with one more argument and let the interface take care of
the execution details.

The users of acpi_os_hotplug_execute() also have to deal with the
fact that it takes only one argument in addition to the work function
pointer, although acpi_os_execute_deferred() actually takes care of
the allocation and freeing of memory, so it would have been able to
pass more arguments to the work function if it hadn't been
constrained by the connection with acpi_os_execute().

Moreover, while alloc_acpi_hp_work() makes GFP_KERNEL memory
allocations, which is correct, because hotplug work items are
always queued up from process context, acpi_os_hotplug_execute()
uses GFP_ATOMIC, as that is needed by acpi_os_execute().  Also,
acpi_os_execute_deferred() queued up by it waits for the ACPI event
workqueues to flush before executing the work function, whereas
alloc_acpi_hp_work() can't do anything similar.  That leads to
somewhat arbitrary differences in behavior between various ACPI
hotplug code paths and has to be straightened up.

For this reason, replace both alloc_acpi_hp_work() and
acpi_os_hotplug_execute() with a single interface,
acpi_hotplug_execute(), combining their behavior and being more
friendly to its users than any of the two.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2013-11-07 19:28:48 +01:00
Rafael J. Wysocki 176a88d79d ACPI / hotplug: Do not execute "insert in progress" _OST
According to the ACPI spec (5.0, Section 6.3.5), the "Device
insertion in progress (pending)" (0x80) _OST status code is
reserved for the "Insertion Processing" (0x200) source event
which is "a result of an OSPM action".  Specifically, it is not
a notification, so that status code should not be used during
notification processing, which unfortunately is done by
acpi_scan_bus_device_check().

For this reason, drop the ACPI_OST_SC_INSERT_IN_PROGRESS _OST
status evaluation from there (it was a mistake to put it in there
in the first place).

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
2013-11-07 01:42:17 +01:00
Rafael J. Wysocki 43d388832b ACPI / hotplug: Carry out PCI root eject directly
Since _handle_hotplug_event_root() is run from the ACPI hotplug
workqueue, it doesn't need to queue up a work item to eject a PCI
host bridge on the same workqueue.  Instead, it can just carry out
the eject by calling acpi_bus_device_eject() directly, so make that
happen.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-11-07 01:42:09 +01:00
Rafael J. Wysocki a3b1b1ef78 ACPI / hotplug: Merge device hot-removal routines
There is no real reasn why acpi_bus_device_eject() and
acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() should work differently, so rework
acpi_bus_device_eject() so that it can be called internally by
both acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and acpi_eject_store_work().
Accordingly, rework acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() to queue up the
execution of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() through
acpi_os_hotplug_execute() on eject request notifications.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-11-07 01:41:58 +01:00
Rafael J. Wysocki ace8238b00 ACPI / hotplug: Make acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() internal
Notice that handle_root_bridge_removal() is the only user of
acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(), so it doesn't have to be exported
any more and can be made internal to the ACPI core.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-11-07 01:41:48 +01:00
Rafael J. Wysocki 5add99cfef ACPI / hotplug: Simplify device ejection routines
Simplify handle_root_bridge_removal() and acpi_eject_store() by
getting rid of struct acpi_eject_event and passing device objects
directly to async routines executed via acpi_os_hotplug_execute().

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-11-07 01:41:39 +01:00
Rafael J. Wysocki 7f28ddecce ACPI / hotplug: Refuse to hot-remove all objects with disabled hotplug
In theory, an ACPI device object may be the parent of another
device object whose hotplug is disabled by user space through its
scan handler.  In that case, the eject operation targeting the
parent should fail as though the parent's own hotplug was disabled,
but currently this is not the case, because acpi_scan_hot_remove()
doesn't check the disable/enable hotplug status of the children
of the top-most object passed to it.

To fix this, modify acpi_bus_offline_companions() to return an
error code if hotplug is disabled for the given device object.
[Also change the name of the function to acpi_bus_offline(),
because it is not only about companions any more, and change
the name of acpi_bus_online_companions() accordingly.]  Make
acpi_scan_hot_remove() propagate that error to its callers.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-11-07 01:41:14 +01:00
Rafael J. Wysocki 6931007cc9 ACPI / scan: Start matching drivers after trying scan handlers
ACPI scan handlers should always be attached to struct acpi_device
objects before any ACPI drivers, but there is a window during which
a driver may be attached to a struct acpi_device before checking if
there is a matching scan handler.  Namely, that will happen if an
ACPI driver module is loaded during acpi_bus_scan() right after
the first namespace walk is complete and before the given device
is processed by the second namespace walk.

To prevent that from happening, set the match_driver flags of
struct acpi_device objects right before running device_attach()
for them in acpi_bus_device_attach().

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-11-07 01:41:01 +01:00
Rafael J. Wysocki 85fb0a1c35 Merge branch 'acpi-hotplug'
* acpi-hotplug:
  PM / hibernate / memory hotplug: Rework mutual exclusion
  PM / hibernate: Create memory bitmaps after freezing user space
  ACPI / scan: Change ordering of locks for device hotplug
2013-09-10 23:14:53 +02:00
Rafael J. Wysocki e0ae8fee0e ACPI / scan: Change ordering of locks for device hotplug
Change the ordering of device hotplug locks in scan.c so that
acpi_scan_lock is always acquired after device_hotplug_lock.

This will make it possible to use device_hotplug_lock around some
code paths that acquire acpi_scan_lock safely (most importantly
system suspend and hibernation).  Apart from that, acpi_scan_lock
is platform-specific and device_hotplug_lock is general, so the
new ordering appears to be more appropriate from the overall
design viewpoint.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-08-31 02:30:14 +02:00
Rafael J. Wysocki 7bc583d102 Merge branch 'acpi-hotplug'
* acpi-hotplug:
  ACPI / hotplug: Remove containers synchronously
  driver core / ACPI: Avoid device hot remove locking issues
2013-08-30 14:14:25 +02:00
Rafael J. Wysocki f943db40c2 ACPI / hotplug: Remove containers synchronously
The current protocol for handling hot remove of containers is very
fragile and causes acpi_eject_store() to acquire acpi_scan_lock
which may deadlock with the removal of the device that it is called
for (the reason is that device sysfs attributes cannot be removed
while their callbacks are being executed and ACPI device objects
are removed under acpi_scan_lock).

The problem is related to the fact that containers are handled by
acpi_bus_device_eject() in a special way, which is to emit an
offline uevent instead of just removing the container.  Then, user
space is expected to handle that uevent and use the container's
"eject" attribute to actually remove it.  That is fragile, because
user space may fail to complete the ejection (for example, by not
using the container's "eject" attribute at all) leaving the BIOS
kind of in a limbo.  Moreover, if the eject event is not signaled
for a container itself, but for its parent device object (or
generally, for an ancestor above it in the ACPI namespace), the
container will be removed straight away without doing that whole
dance.

For this reason, modify acpi_bus_device_eject() to remove containers
synchronously like any other objects (user space will get its uevent
anyway in case it does some other things in response to it) and
remove the eject_pending ACPI device flag that is not used any more.
This way acpi_eject_store() doesn't have a reason to acquire
acpi_scan_lock any more and one possible deadlock scenario goes
away (plus the code is simplified a bit).

Reported-and-tested-by: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-08-29 22:01:16 +02:00
Rafael J. Wysocki 0c581415b5 Merge branch 'acpi-assorted'
* acpi-assorted:
  ACPI / osl: Kill macro INVALID_TABLE().
  earlycpio.c: Fix the confusing comment of find_cpio_data().
  ACPI / x86: Print Hot-Pluggable Field in SRAT.
  ACPI / thermal: Use THERMAL_TRIPS_NONE macro to replace number
  ACPI / thermal: Remove unused macros in the driver/acpi/thermal.c
  ACPI / thermal: Remove the unused lock of struct acpi_thermal
  ACPI / osl: Fix osi_setup_entries[] __initdata attribute location
  ACPI / numa: Fix __init attribute location in slit_valid()
  ACPI / dock: Fix __init attribute location in find_dock_and_bay()
  ACPI / Sleep: Fix incorrect placement of __initdata
  ACPI / processor: Fix incorrect placement of __initdata
  ACPI / EC: Fix incorrect placement of __initdata
  ACPI / scan: Drop unnecessary label from acpi_create_platform_device()
  ACPI: Move acpi_bus_get_device() from bus.c to scan.c
  ACPI / scan: Allow platform device creation without any IO resources
  ACPI: Cleanup sparse warning on acpi_os_initialize1()
  platform / thinkpad: Remove deprecated hotkey_report_mode parameter
  ACPI: Remove the old /proc/acpi/event interface
2013-08-27 01:29:04 +02:00
Rafael J. Wysocki 0ad4c9a984 Merge branch 'acpi-pm'
* acpi-pm:
  ACPI / PM: Add state information to error message in acpi_device_set_power()
  ACPI / PM: Remove redundant power manageable check from acpi_bus_set_power()
  ACPI / PM: Use ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD instead of ACPI_STATE_D3 everywhere
  ACPI / PM: Make messages in acpi_device_set_power() print device names
  ACPI / PM: Only set power states of devices that are power manageable
2013-08-27 01:28:17 +02:00
Rafael J. Wysocki c92f56cbdf Merge branch 'acpi-cleanup'
* acpi-cleanup: (21 commits)
  ACPI / dock: fix error return code in dock_add()
  ACPI / dock: Drop unnecessary local variable from dock_add()
  ACPI / dock / PCI: Drop ACPI dock notifier chain
  ACPI / dock: Do not check CONFIG_ACPI_DOCK_MODULE
  ACPI / dock: Do not leak memory on falilures to add a dock station
  ACPI: Drop ACPI bus notifier call chain
  ACPI / dock: Rework the handling of notifications
  ACPI / dock: Simplify dock_init_hotplug() and dock_release_hotplug()
  ACPI / dock: Walk list in reverse order during removal of devices
  ACPI / dock: Rework and simplify find_dock_devices()
  ACPI / dock: Drop the hp_lock mutex from struct dock_station
  ACPI: simplify acpiphp driver with new helper functions
  ACPI: simplify dock driver with new helper functions
  ACPI: Export acpi_(bay)|(dock)_match() from scan.c
  ACPI: introduce two helper functions for _EJ0 and _LCK
  ACPI: introduce helper function acpi_execute_simple_method()
  ACPI: introduce helper function acpi_has_method()
  ACPI / dock: simplify dock_create_acpi_device()
  ACPI / dock: mark initialization functions with __init
  ACPI / dock: drop redundant spin lock in dock station object
  ...
2013-08-27 01:25:28 +02:00
Rafael J. Wysocki f3ce717e60 Merge back earlier 'acpi-assorted' material 2013-08-14 23:22:45 +02:00
Rafael J. Wysocki caf5c03f17 ACPI: Move acpi_bus_get_device() from bus.c to scan.c
Move acpi_bus_get_device() from bus.c to scan.c which allows
acpi_bus_data_handler() to become static and clean up the latter.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-08-06 14:12:22 +02:00
Rafael J. Wysocki 8ad928d52e ACPI / PM: Use ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD instead of ACPI_STATE_D3 everywhere
There are several places in the tree where ACPI_STATE_D3 is used
instead of ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD which should be used instead for
clarity.  Modify them all to use ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD as appropriate.

[The definition of ACPI_STATE_D3 itself cannot go away at this point
 as it is part of ACPICA.]

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
2013-07-30 14:36:20 +02:00
Jiang Liu ebf4df8db0 ACPI: Export acpi_(bay)|(dock)_match() from scan.c
Functions acpi_dock_match() and acpi_bay_match() in scan.c can be
shared with dock.c to reduce code duplication, so export them as
global functions.

Also add a new function acpi_ata_match() to check whether an ACPI
device object represents an ATA device.

[rjw: Changelog]
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-07-15 01:33:10 +02:00
Jiang Liu 7d2421f84b ACPI: introduce two helper functions for _EJ0 and _LCK
Introduce two helper functions, acpi_evaluate_ej0() and
acpi_evaluate_lck(), that will execute the _EJ0 and _LCK ACPI
control methods, respectively, and use them to simplify the
ACPI scan code.

[rjw: Changelog]
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-07-15 01:33:10 +02:00
Jiang Liu 952c63e951 ACPI: introduce helper function acpi_has_method()
Introduce helper function acpi_has_method() and use it in a number
of places to simplify code.

[rjw: Changelog]
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-07-15 01:33:10 +02:00
Rafael J. Wysocki 8832f7e43f ACPI / scan: Always call acpi_bus_scan() for bus check notifications
An ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK notification means that we should scan the
entire namespace starting from the given handle even if the device
represented by that handle is present (other devices below it may
just have appeared).

For this reason, modify acpi_scan_bus_device_check() to always run
acpi_bus_scan() if the notification being handled is of type
ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Cc: 3.10+ <stable@vger.kernel.org>
2013-07-15 01:26:18 +02:00
Rafael J. Wysocki 3a391a3959 ACPI / scan: Do not try to attach scan handlers to devices having them
In acpi_bus_device_attach(), if there is an ACPI device object
for the given handle and that device object has a scan handler
attached to it already, there's nothing more to do for that handle.
Moreover, if acpi_scan_attach_handler() is called then, it may
execute the .attach() callback of the ACPI scan handler already
attached to the device object and that may lead to interesting
breakage.

For this reason, make acpi_bus_device_attach() return success
immediately when the handle's device object has a scan handler
attached to it.

Reported-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Cc: 3.10+ <stable@vger.kernel.org>
2013-07-15 01:26:18 +02:00
Haicheng Li b67cf7c44c ACPI / scan: remove unused LIST_HEAD(acpi_device_list)
The acpi_device_list list is not used, so removed it.

[rjw: Changelog]
Signed-off-by: Haicheng Li <haicheng.li@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-07-04 13:27:43 +02:00
Rafael J. Wysocki bdc8f09685 Merge branch 'acpi-assorted'
* acpi-assorted:
  ACPI / EC: Add HP Folio 13 to ec_dmi_table in order to skip DSDT scan
  ACPI: Add CMOS RTC Operation Region handler support
  ACPI: Remove unused flags in acpi_device_flags
  ACPI: Remove useless initializers
  ACPI / battery: Make sure all spaces are in correct places
  ACPI: add _STA evaluation at do_acpi_find_child()
  ACPI / EC: access user space with get_user()/put_user()
2013-06-28 13:00:38 +02:00
Rafael J. Wysocki 8e9914d5ef Merge branch 'acpi-scan'
* acpi-scan:
  ACPI / scan: Do not bind ACPI drivers to objects with scan handlers
  ACPI / ia64 / sba_iommu: Use ACPI scan handler for device discovery
  ACPI / scan: Simplify ACPI driver probing
2013-06-28 12:58:21 +02:00
Rafael J. Wysocki a204dbc61b Merge branch 'acpi-hotplug'
* acpi-hotplug:
  ACPI: Do not use CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_MEMORY_MODULE
  ACPI / cpufreq: Add ACPI processor device IDs to acpi-cpufreq
  Memory hotplug: Move alternative function definitions to header
  ACPI / processor: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference in acpi_processor_add()
  Memory hotplug / ACPI: Simplify memory removal
  ACPI / scan: Add second pass of companion offlining to hot-remove code
  Driver core / MM: Drop offline_memory_block()
  ACPI / processor: Pass processor object handle to acpi_bind_one()
  ACPI: Drop removal_type field from struct acpi_device
  Driver core / memory: Simplify __memory_block_change_state()
  ACPI / processor: Initialize per_cpu(processors, pr->id) properly
  CPU: Fix sysfs cpu/online of offlined CPUs
  Driver core: Introduce offline/online callbacks for memory blocks
  ACPI / memhotplug: Bind removable memory blocks to ACPI device nodes
  ACPI / processor: Use common hotplug infrastructure
  ACPI / hotplug: Use device offline/online for graceful hot-removal
  Driver core: Use generic offline/online for CPU offline/online
  Driver core: Add offline/online device operations
2013-06-28 12:58:05 +02:00
Lan Tianyu 2fa97feb44 ACPI: Add CMOS RTC Operation Region handler support
On HP Folio 13-2000, the BIOS defines a CMOS RTC Operation Region and
the EC's _REG methord accesses that region.  Thus an appropriate
address space handler must be registered for that region before the
EC driver is loaded.

Introduce a mechanism for adding CMOS RTC address space handlers.
Register an ACPI scan handler for CMOS RTC devices such that, when
a device of that kind is detected during an ACPI namespace scan, a
common CMOS RTC operation region address space handler will be
installed for it.

References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54621
Reported-and-tested-by: Stefan Nagy <public@stefan-nagy.at>
Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
Cc: 3.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-06-27 21:35:37 +02:00
Jiang Liu 94add0f824 ACPI / dock: Initialize ACPI dock subsystem upfront
Commit 3b63aaa70e (PCI: acpiphp: Do not use ACPI PCI subdriver
mechanism) introduced an ACPI dock support regression, because it
changed the relative initialization order of the ACPI dock subsystem
and the ACPI-based PCI hotplug (acpiphp).

Namely, the ACPI dock subsystem has to be initialized before
acpiphp_enumerate_slots() is first run, which after commit
3b63aaa70e happens during the initial enumeration of the PCI
hierarchy triggered by the initial ACPI namespace scan in
acpi_scan_init().  For this reason, the dock subsystem has to be
initialized before the initial ACPI namespace scan in
acpi_scan_init().

To make that happen, modify the ACPI dock subsystem to be
non-modular and add the invocation of its initialization routine,
acpi_dock_init(), to acpi_scan_init() directly before the initial
namespace scan.

[rjw: Changelog, removal of dock_exit().]
References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59501
Reported-and-tested-by: Alexander E. Patrakov <patrakov@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Illya Klymov <xanf@xanf.me>
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: 3.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-06-23 00:59:55 +02:00
Rafael J. Wysocki 24071f472d ACPI / scan: Do not bind ACPI drivers to objects with scan handlers
ACPI drivers must not be bound to device objects having scan handlers
attatched to them, so make acpi_device_probe() fail with -EINVAL if the
device object being probed has an ACPI scan handler.

After this change the analogous check introduced into the ACPI video
driver by commit 8c9b7a7 (ACPI / video: Do not bind to device objects
with a scan handler) is not necessary any more and may be dropped, so
drop it.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-06-20 01:25:19 +02:00
Rafael J. Wysocki d9e455f53f ACPI / scan: Simplify ACPI driver probing
There is no particular reason why acpi_bus_driver_init() needs to be
a separate function and its location with respect to its only caller,
acpi_device_probe(), makes the code a bit difficult to follow.

Besides, it doesn't really make sense to check if 'device' is not
NULL in acpi_bus_driver_init(), because we've already dereferenced
dev->driver in acpi_device_probe() at that point and, moreover,
'device' cannot be NULL then, because acpi_device_probe() is called
via really_probe() (which also sets dev->driver for that matter).

For these reasons, drop acpi_bus_driver_init() altogether and move
the remaining code from it directly into acpi_device_probe().

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-06-16 00:36:06 +02:00
Rafael J. Wysocki 8c9b7a7b2f ACPI / video: Do not bind to device objects with a scan handler
With the introduction of ACPI scan handlers, ACPI device objects
with an ACPI scan handler attached to them must not be bound to
by ACPI drivers any more.  Unfortunately, however, the ACPI video
driver attempts to do just that if there is a _ROM ACPI control
method defined under a device object with an ACPI scan handler.

Prevent that from happening by making the video driver's "add"
routine check if the device object already has an ACPI scan handler
attached to it and return an error code in that case.

That is not sufficient, though, because acpi_bus_driver_init() would
then clear the device object's driver_data that may be set by its
scan handler, so for the fix to work acpi_bus_driver_init() has to be
modified to leave driver_data as is on errors.

References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58091
Bisected-and-tested-by: Dmitry S. Demin <dmitryy.demin@gmail.com>
Reported-and-tested-by: Jason Cassell <bluesloth600@gmail.com>
Tracked-down-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Cc: 3.9+ <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
2013-06-10 13:00:29 +02:00
Rafael J. Wysocki ea7f665612 Revert "ACPI / scan: do not match drivers against objects having scan handlers"
Commit 9f29ab11dd ("ACPI / scan: do not match drivers against objects
having scan handlers") introduced a boot regression on Tony's ia64 HP
rx2600.  Tony says:

  "It panics with the message:

   Kernel panic - not syncing: Unable to find SBA IOMMU: Try a generic or DIG kernel

   [...] my problem comes from arch/ia64/hp/common/sba_iommu.c
   where the code in sba_init() says:

        acpi_bus_register_driver(&acpi_sba_ioc_driver);
        if (!ioc_list) {

   but because of this change we never managed to call ioc_init()
   so ioc_list doesn't get set up, and we die."

Revert it to avoid this breakage and we'll fix the problem it attempted
to address later.

Reported-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@gmail.com>
Cc: 3.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-06-07 18:33:12 -07:00
Aaron Lu 9f29ab11dd ACPI / scan: do not match drivers against objects having scan handlers
With the introduction of ACPI scan handlers, an ACPI device object
with an ACPI scan handler attached to it must not be bound to an ACPI
driver any more.  Therefore it doesn't make sense to match those
ACPI device objects against a newly registered ACPI driver in
acpi_bus_match(), so make that function return 0 if the device
object passed to it has an ACPI scan handler attached.

This also addresses a regression related to a broken ACPI table in
the BIOS, where it has defined a _ROM method under the PCI root
bridge object.  This causes the video module to treat that object
as a display controller device (since only display devices are
supposed to have a _ROM method defined according to the ACPI spec).
As a result, the ACPI video driver binds to the PCI root bridge
object and overwrites the previously assigned driver_data field of
it, causing subsequent calls to acpi_get_pci_dev() to fail.

[rjw: Subject and changelog]
References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58091
Reported-by: Jason Cassell <bluesloth600@gmail.com>
Reported-and-bisected-by: Dmitry S. Demin <dmitryy.demin@gmail.com>
Cc: 3.9+ <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-06-05 13:11:47 +02:00
Rafael J. Wysocki 303bfdb1a1 ACPI / scan: Add second pass of companion offlining to hot-remove code
As indicated by comments in mm/memory_hotplug.c:remove_memory(),
if CONFIG_MEMCG is set, it may not be possible to offline all of the
memory blocks held by one module (FRU) in one pass (because one of
them may be used by the others to store page cgroup in that case
and that block has to be offlined before the other ones).

To handle that arguably corner case, add a second pass of companion
device offlining to acpi_scan_hot_remove() and make it ignore errors
returned in the first pass (and make it skip the second pass if the
first one is successful).

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-06-01 21:37:10 +02:00
Rafael J. Wysocki 2e199192df ACPI: Drop removal_type field from struct acpi_device
The ACPI processor driver was the only user of the removal_type
field in struct acpi_device, but it doesn't use that field any more
after recent changes.  Thus, removal_type has no more users, so drop
it along with the associated data type.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-06-01 21:37:09 +02:00
Linus Torvalds 27a24cfa04 Merge branch 'fixes' of git://git.infradead.org/users/vkoul/slave-dma
Pull slave-dma fixes from Vinod Koul:
 "We have two patches from Andy & Rafael fixing the Lynxpoint dma"

* 'fixes' of git://git.infradead.org/users/vkoul/slave-dma:
  ACPI / LPSS: register clock device for Lynxpoint DMA properly
  dma: acpi-dma: parse CSRT to extract additional resources
2013-05-25 20:30:31 -07:00
Catalin Marinas 7a26b53070 ACPI / scan: Fix memory leak on acpi_scan_init_hotplug() error path
Following commit 6b772e8f9 (ACPI: Update PNPID match handling for
notify), the acpi_scan_init_hotplug() calls acpi_set_pnp_ids() which
allocates acpi_hardware_id and copies a few strings (kstrdup). If the
devices does not have hardware_id set, the function exits without
freeing the previously allocated ids (and kmemleak complains). This
patch calls simply changes 'return' on error to a 'goto out' which
calls acpi_free_pnp_ids().

Reported-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Tested-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-05-15 21:42:24 +02:00
Andy Shevchenko ee8209fd02 dma: acpi-dma: parse CSRT to extract additional resources
Since we have CSRT only to get additional DMA controller resources, let's get
rid of drivers/acpi/csrt.c and move its logic inside ACPI DMA helpers code.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2013-05-14 10:23:57 +05:30
Rafael J. Wysocki ac212b6980 ACPI / processor: Use common hotplug infrastructure
Split the ACPI processor driver into two parts, one that is
non-modular, resides in the ACPI core and handles the enumeration
and hotplug of processors and one that implements the rest of the
existing processor driver functionality.

The non-modular part uses an ACPI scan handler object to enumerate
processors on the basis of information provided by the ACPI namespace
and to hook up with the common ACPI hotplug infrastructure.  It also
populates the ACPI handle of each processor device having a
corresponding object in the ACPI namespace, which allows the driver
proper to bind to those devices, and makes the driver bind to them
if it is readily available (i.e. loaded) when the scan handler's
.attach() routine is running.

There are a few reasons to make this change.

First, switching the ACPI processor driver to using the common ACPI
hotplug infrastructure reduces code duplication and size considerably,
even though a new file is created along with a header comment etc.

Second, since the common hotplug code attempts to offline devices
before starting the (non-reversible) removal procedure, it will abort
(and possibly roll back) hot-remove operations involving processors
if cpu_down() returns an error code for one of them instead of
continuing them blindly (if /sys/firmware/acpi/hotplug/force_remove
is unset).  That is a more desirable behavior than what the current
code does.

Finally, the separation of the scan/hotplug part from the driver
proper makes it possible to simplify the driver's .remove() routine,
because it doesn't need to worry about the possible cleanup related
to processor removal any more (the scan/hotplug part is responsible
for that now) and can handle device removal and driver removal
symmetricaly (i.e. as appropriate).

Some user-visible changes in sysfs are made (for example, the
'sysdev' link from the ACPI device node to the processor device's
directory is gone and a 'physical_node' link is present instead
and a corresponding 'firmware_node' is present in the processor
device's directory, the processor driver is now visible under
/sys/bus/cpu/drivers/ and bound to the processor device), but
that shouldn't affect the functionality that users care about
(frequency scaling, C-states and thermal management).

Tested on my venerable Toshiba Portege R500.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-05-12 14:14:32 +02:00
Rafael J. Wysocki 683058e315 ACPI / hotplug: Use device offline/online for graceful hot-removal
Modify the generic ACPI hotplug code to be able to check if devices
scheduled for hot-removal may be gracefully removed from the system
using the device offline/online mechanism introduced previously.

Namely, make acpi_scan_hot_remove() handling device hot-removal call
device_offline() for all physical companions of the ACPI device nodes
involved in the operation and check the results.  If any of the
device_offline() calls fails, the function will not progress to the
removal phase (which cannot be aborted), unless its (new) force
argument is set (in case of a failing offline it will put the devices
offlined by it back online).

In support of 'forced' device hot-removal, add a new sysfs attribute
'force_remove' that will reside under /sys/firmware/acpi/hotplug/.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-05-12 14:14:24 +02:00
Linus Torvalds 3ed1c478ef Power management and ACPI updates for 3.10-rc1
- ARM big.LITTLE cpufreq driver from Viresh Kumar.
 
 - exynos5440 cpufreq driver from Amit Daniel Kachhap.
 
 - cpufreq core cleanup and code consolidation from Viresh Kumar and
   Stratos Karafotis.
 
 - cpufreq scalability improvement from Nathan Zimmer.
 
 - AMD "frequency sensitivity feedback" powersave bias for the ondemand
   cpufreq governor from Jacob Shin.
 
 - cpuidle code consolidation and cleanups from Daniel Lezcano.
 
 - ARM OMAP cpuidle fixes from Santosh Shilimkar and Daniel Lezcano.
 
 - ACPICA fixes and other improvements from Bob Moore, Jung-uk Kim,
   Lv Zheng, Yinghai Lu, Tang Chen, Colin Ian King, and Linn Crosetto.
 
 - ACPI core updates related to hotplug from Toshi Kani, Paul Bolle,
   Yasuaki Ishimatsu, and Rafael J. Wysocki.
 
 - Intel Lynxpoint LPSS (Low-Power Subsystem) support improvements
   from Rafael J. Wysocki and Andy Shevchenko.
 
 /
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
 
 iQIcBAABAgAGBQJRf8M8AAoJEKhOf7ml8uNsud4P/3cabXP5lDipzibRrpOiONse
 puuvIdhtNdMRMc3t1oSDjNH/w/JA51Gc+ICGFAORiyVmqxBc85mpT6J5ibqV7hNd
 pCqbKJceoB5PajHZSx22e4wG9O7YN1k3r80p38IfFzA+Ct0KNSuE0ixMEfHKYjiq
 p5pXswk6TY3gtBReH9agrafHqDtXw4IMTE0asMuJ+BorPW7vQeiNlrkuA+0qmDuu
 26O0Pm2TVkx1ryfTjdM9zSZ9X2G4JuM8rm1/VFZWQJTExwlv3bA2Za1nvQNJlJ99
 6JZ0JXfAehcEW2Ye0sqsZ8HSEabDVHM29QvvOszJ5RpBXERiOCHOkhvFleCoTpn0
 Xq0rtXPrLMH1G28Ej+cxmsAjfzOLV2Byg30CAoI/GCLuQ+xh+VMCpuNYQuld25CG
 9rtYd0fWESeYsAebhDcX0E3xyzJtbrHtOb9PyGwNkbAJ8YQfhVSMCOPi2SX2wa+Q
 qXLXi2VaHvjBSUKcAv5BmM+Ya57Be+88D0LxbgXbUeOnYefUK1ljldKDDshkMjgG
 P4LPdm4JpoB5ncXSOO1Dz9w9QnNcFexSUySd/TtKLNMha1vEHV8ISzNPYY+9IdXf
 XN0VZbFnUDzdj+Fwna7zyFb1cGihDYJKAtpXvRd8Y6RGUxKx9uGLAFJZw/xZB/cR
 KZKuML5O8MgJuef37F38
 =H/se
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'pm+acpi-3.10-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm

Pull power management and ACPI updates from Rafael J Wysocki:

 - ARM big.LITTLE cpufreq driver from Viresh Kumar.

 - exynos5440 cpufreq driver from Amit Daniel Kachhap.

 - cpufreq core cleanup and code consolidation from Viresh Kumar and
   Stratos Karafotis.

 - cpufreq scalability improvement from Nathan Zimmer.

 - AMD "frequency sensitivity feedback" powersave bias for the ondemand
   cpufreq governor from Jacob Shin.

 - cpuidle code consolidation and cleanups from Daniel Lezcano.

 - ARM OMAP cpuidle fixes from Santosh Shilimkar and Daniel Lezcano.

 - ACPICA fixes and other improvements from Bob Moore, Jung-uk Kim, Lv
   Zheng, Yinghai Lu, Tang Chen, Colin Ian King, and Linn Crosetto.

 - ACPI core updates related to hotplug from Toshi Kani, Paul Bolle,
   Yasuaki Ishimatsu, and Rafael J Wysocki.

 - Intel Lynxpoint LPSS (Low-Power Subsystem) support improvements from
   Rafael J Wysocki and Andy Shevchenko.

* tag 'pm+acpi-3.10-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm: (192 commits)
  cpufreq: Revert incorrect commit 5800043
  cpufreq: MAINTAINERS: Add co-maintainer
  cpuidle: add maintainer entry
  ACPI / thermal: do not always return THERMAL_TREND_RAISING for active trip points
  ARM: s3c64xx: cpuidle: use init/exit common routine
  cpufreq: pxa2xx: initialize variables
  ACPI: video: correct acpi_video_bus_add error processing
  SH: cpuidle: use init/exit common routine
  ARM: S5pv210: compiling issue, ARM_S5PV210_CPUFREQ needs CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE=y
  ACPI: Fix wrong parameter passed to memblock_reserve
  cpuidle: fix comment format
  pnp: use %*phC to dump small buffers
  isapnp: remove debug leftovers
  ARM: imx: cpuidle: use init/exit common routine
  ARM: davinci: cpuidle: use init/exit common routine
  ARM: kirkwood: cpuidle: use init/exit common routine
  ARM: calxeda: cpuidle: use init/exit common routine
  ARM: tegra: cpuidle: use init/exit common routine for tegra3
  ARM: tegra: cpuidle: use init/exit common routine for tegra2
  ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle: use init/exit common routine
  ...
2013-04-30 15:21:02 -07:00
Rafael J. Wysocki 2467d7b703 Merge branch 'acpi-lpss'
* acpi-lpss:
  ACPI / LPSS: make code less confusing for reader
  ACPI / LPSS: Add support for exposing LTR registers to user space
  ACPI / scan: Add special handler for Intel Lynxpoint LPSS devices
2013-04-28 01:53:41 +02:00
Jiang Liu 5c0b04e3d9 PCI/ACPI: Handle PCI slot devices when creating/destroying PCI buses
Currently the pci_slot driver doesn't update PCI slot devices when PCI
device hotplug event happens, which may cause memory leak and returning
stale information to user.

Now the pci_slot driver has been changed as built-in driver, so invoke
PCI slot enumeration and destroy routines directly from the PCI core.
And remove ACPI PCI sub-driver related code because it isn't needed
any more.

[bhelgas: removed "extern" from function declarations]
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-04-12 15:38:25 -06:00
Toshi Kani 882fd12e64 ACPI: Verify device status after eject
ACPI spec states that the OS evaluates _STA after calling _EJ0
in order to verify if eject was successful.  Added a check to
verify if the enabled bit of the status value is cleared after
_EJ0.

Note, the present bit is not checked since some FW implementations
do not clear the present bit until the hardware is physically
removed.

Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-03-25 00:18:43 +01:00
Toshi Kani 2cbb14fb70 ACPI: Update _OST handling for notify
When the kernel calls _OSC with OSC_SB_HOTPLUG_OST_SUPPORT bit
set at boot-time, the OS is responsible for calling _OST for
ACPI hotplug events.  However, when hotplug.enabled attribute
is unset for ACPI scan drivers, their notify handlers are removed
and _OST is not called for ACPI hotplug events as a result.

This patch keeps the notify handler of ACPI scan drivers,
acpi_hotplug_notify_cb(), installed regardless of the state of
hotplug.enabled.  The notify handler then checks if hotplug.enabled
is set for the associated scan handler.  If unset, the notify
handler calls _OST with a proper error code.  The patch also
eliminates ACPI namespace walk when hotplug.enabled is changed
via sysfs.

Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-03-24 23:49:39 +01:00
Toshi Kani 6b772e8f9e ACPI: Update PNPID match handling for notify
When installing/removing a notify handler to/from an ACPI device
object, ACPI core tries to match its associated scan handler to
see if it supports hotplug.  However, the matching logic of the
notify handler is different from the matching logic of attaching
a scan handler to an ACPI device object.  This patch updates the
matching logic of the notify handlers to be consistent with the
attach handling.

Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-03-24 23:49:39 +01:00
Toshi Kani c0af41757f ACPI: Update PNPID set/free interfaces
This patch introduces acpi_set_pnp_ids() and acpi_free_pnp_ids(),
which are updated from acpi_device_set_id() and acpi_free_ids(),
to setup and free acpi_device_pnp for a given acpi_handle.  They
can be called without acpi_device.

Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-03-24 23:49:38 +01:00
Toshi Kani d4e1a692e9 ACPI: Remove acpi_device dependency in acpi_device_set_id()
This patch updates the internal operations of acpi_device_set_id()
to setup acpi_device_pnp without using acpi_device.  There is no
functional change to acpi_device_set_id() in this patch.

acpi_pnp_type is added to acpi_device_pnp, so that PNPID type is
self-contained within acpi_device_pnp.  acpi_add_id(), acpi_bay_match(),
acpi_dock_match(), acpi_ibm_smbus_match() and acpi_is_video_device()
are changed to take acpi_handle as an argument, instead of acpi_device.

Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-03-24 23:49:38 +01:00
Rafael J. Wysocki f58b082aed ACPI / scan: Add special handler for Intel Lynxpoint LPSS devices
Devices on the Intel Lynxpoint Low Power Subsystem (LPSS) have some
common features that aren't shared with any other platform devices,
including the clock and LTR (Latency Tolerance Reporting) registers.
It is better to handle those features in common code than to bother
device drivers with doing that (I/O functionality-wise the LPSS
devices are generally compatible with other devices that don't
have those special registers and may be handled by the same drivers).

The clock registers of the LPSS devices are now taken care of by
the special clk-x86-lpss driver, but the MMIO mappings used for
accessing those registers can also be used for accessing the LTR
registers on those devices (LTR support for the Lynxpoint LPSS is
going to be added by a subsequent patch).  Thus it is convenient
to add a special ACPI scan handler for the Lynxpoint LPSS devices
that will create the MMIO mappings for accessing the clock (and
LTR in the future) registers and will register the LPSS devices'
clocks, so the clk-x86-lpss driver will only need to take care of
the main Lynxpoint LPSS clock.

Introduce a special ACPI scan handler for Intel Lynxpoint LPSS
devices as described above.  This also reduces overhead related to
browsing the ACPI namespace in search of the LPSS devices before the
registration of their clocks, removes some LPSS-specific (and
somewhat ugly) code from acpi_platform.c and shrinks the overall code
size slightly.

Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
2013-03-21 22:44:38 +01:00