This drops another symbol dependency between setup.c and sprom.c which
will allow us to make SPROM code a separated module (and share it with
ARM).
Patch tested on Linksys WRT300N V1.
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
Cc: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/11360/
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Extra bcma buses may be totally different models, see following dump:
boardtype=0x0646
pci/1/1/boardtype=0x0545
pci/2/1/boardtype=0x62b
We need to detect them properly to allow drivers apply some board
specific hacks.
[ralf@linux-mips.org: folded in Rafal's fix.]
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Cc: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/10028/
Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/10048/
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
There are two reasons for having this header in the common place:
1) Simplifying drivers that read NVRAM entries. We will be able to
safely call bcm47xx_nvram_* functions without #ifdef-s.
2) Getting NVRAM driver out of MIPS arch code. This is needed to support
BCM5301X arch which also requires this NVRAM driver. Patch for that
will follow once we get is reviewed.
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: linux-soc@vger.kernel.org
Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/8619/
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Recently the output of "system type" in /proc/cpuinfo was changed to
Broadcom BCM4730 (Some sample board), but it is better to just print
the SoC name in the "system type" entry. The board name will be added
in the machine entry later.
Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
Signed-off-by: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
Patchwork: http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/5865/
There are bcma based devices like the Linksys E2000 out there, which do
have one ieee80211 core, but no PCIe core and they are using no
prefixes for the sprom. In addition some values like boardtype are
stored without a prefix for the main SoC chip also when they have an
additional PCIe wifi chip with an own boardtype var on some devices.
The Ethernet addresses are now also read out correctly without a prefix
so calling bcm47xx_fill_sprom_ethernet is not needed any more.
Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
Patchwork: http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/4364
Signed-off-by: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
This struct contains information about the board, the chip is running
on. The struct is filled for PCIe devices and SoCs. This information is
used by b43 and will be used by brcmsmac soon.
Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
Tested-by: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Now the fetching of board data also uses nvram_read_u16 and not
simple_strtoul any more.
Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
Acked-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Move the sprom parsing from nvram into sprom.c. There are all values
needed for sprom version 1 to 9 read from nvram and there are more
sanity checks added. This is based on the sprom parsing in the open
source part of the Broadcom SDK.
Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
This patch add support for the bcma bus. Broadcom uses only Mips 74K
CPUs on the new SoC and on the old ons using ssb bus there are no Mips
74K CPUs.
Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
Acked-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Prepare bcm47xx to support different System buses. Before adding
support for bcma it should be possible to build bcm47xx without the
need of ssb. With this patch bcm47xx does not directly contain a
ssb_bus, but a union contain all the supported system buses. As a SoC
just uses one system bus a union is a good choice.
Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
Acked-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
