Impact: cleanup
It's unused, since about 1995. So remove all initialization of it in
preparation for actually removing the field.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Move all applicable EXPORT_SYMBOL()s to the file where the respective
symbol is defined.
Removed all the includes that are no longer needed in sparc_ksyms_32.c
Comment all remaining EXPORT_SYMBOL()s in sparc_ksyms_32.c
Two symbols are shared with sparc64 thus the exports were removed from
the sparc_ksyms_64.c too, along with the include their ommission made
redundant.
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Additions by Julian Calaby:
* Moved EXPORT_SYMBOL()s for prom functions to their rightful places.
* Made some minor cleanups to the includes and comments of sparc_ksyms_32.c
* Made another subtraction from sparc_ksyms_64.c
* Updated and tidied commit message.
* Rebased patch over sparc-2.6.git HEAD.
* Ensured that all modified files have the correct includes.
Signed-off-by: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
When CONFIG_PROC_FS is unset, include/linux/interrupt.h defines
init_irq_proc() as an empty function.
arch/sparc/kernel/irq_32.c defines this function unconditionally.
Fix the latter so that it only defines this function when CONFIG_PROC_FS
is set.
This fixes the following error:
arch/sparc/kernel/irq_32.c:672: error: redefinition of 'init_irq_proc'
include/linux/interrupt.h:461: error: previous definition of
'init_irq_proc' was here
This was found using randconfig builds.
Signed-off-by: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Fix following sparse warnings:
symbol 'static_irqaction' was not declared. Should it be static?
symbol 'static_irq_count' was not declared. Should it be static?
symbol 'irq_action_lock' was not declared. Should it be static?
symbol 'unexpected_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
symbol 'handler_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
returning void-valued expression
returning void-valued expression
returning void-valued expression
symbol 'init_IRQ' was not declared. Should it be static?
Warnings were fixed by addding proper declarations
and fixing return path of a few functions.
There remains several warnings all related to the floppy driver.
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
o sparc32 files with identical names to sparc64 renamed to <name>_32.S
o introduced a few Kconfig helpers to simplify Makefile logic
o refactored Makefile to prepare for unification
- use obj-$(CONFIG_SPARC32) for sparc32 specific files
- use <name>_$(BITS) for files where sparc64 has a _64 variant
- sparc64 directly include a few files where sparc32 builds them,
refer to these files directly (no BITS)
- sneaked in -Werror as used by sparc64
o modified sparc/Makefile to use the new names for head/init_task
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
