The write to the punit may fail, so propagate the error code back to its
callers. Of particular interest are the RPS writes, so add appropriate
user error codes and logging.
v2: Add DEBUG for failed frequency changes during RPS.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170126101919.13211-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):
text data bss dec hex filename
1078551 4557 416 1083524 108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775 4557 416 1075748 106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-59-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):
text data bss dec hex filename
1078551 4557 416 1083524 108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775 4557 416 1075748 106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-58-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):
text data bss dec hex filename
1078551 4557 416 1083524 108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775 4557 416 1075748 106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-57-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):
text data bss dec hex filename
1078551 4557 416 1083524 108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775 4557 416 1075748 106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-56-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):
text data bss dec hex filename
1078551 4557 416 1083524 108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775 4557 416 1075748 106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-55-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):
text data bss dec hex filename
1078551 4557 416 1083524 108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775 4557 416 1075748 106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-54-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Make the gpio read/write functions more generic iosf sideband read/write
functions, taking the iosf port as argument.
v2: rebase
v3: rebase
v4 by Jani: address Ville's review
v5 by Jani: drop the PCI_DEVFN change (Ville)
Signed-off-by: Deepak M <m.deepak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1454604915-17142-1-git-send-email-jani.nikula@intel.com
Rename dpio_lock to sb_lock to inform the reader that its primary
purpose is to protect the sideband mailbox rather than some DPIO
state.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
As per the specififcation, the SB_DevFn is the PCI_DEVFN of the target
device and not the source. So PCI_DEVFN(2,0) is not correct. Further the
port ID should be enough to identify devices unless they are MFD. The
SB_DevFn was intended to remove ambiguity in case of these MFD devices.
For non MFD devices the recommendation for the target device IP was to
ignore these fields, but not all of them followed the recommendation.
Some like CCK ignore these fields and hence PCI_DEVFN(2, 0) works and so
does PCI_DEVFN(0, 0) as it works for DPIO. The issue came to light because
of GPIONC which was not getting programmed correctly with PCI_DEVFN(2, 0).
It turned out that this did not follow the recommendation and expected 0
in this field.
In general the recommendation is to use SB_DevFn as PCI_DEVFN(0, 0) for
all devices except target PCI devices.
Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Looks like latest BSW/CHV production system has sideband address > 128.
Use u32 data types to cover new offset/address range :)
Signed-off-by: Deepak S <deepak.s@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
So far we used the wrong opcodes to access the DSI registers, so the
register writes during DSI programming didn't actually succeed and left
the registers unchanged. This wasn't a problem for the initial modeset,
where the BIOS-programmed values happened to work, but after resuming
from s0ix these registers are reset and failing to program them results
in a blank screen.
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
These opcodes are not specific for an endpoint, but are the same for all
endpoints. So rename them accordingly, using the name the VLV2 sideband
HAS uses. Also move the macros to the .c file, since they aren't used
anywhere else.
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
DPIO reads from groups/broadcast register offsets for PCS and
TX return all 1's. If that result gets used for something
we'll probably end up doing something wrong. So warn when that
happens.
FIXME there might be some registers where all 1's is a valid value,
so ideally we should check the register offset instead...
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
[danvet: copypaste the FIXME comment into the code.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
vlv_dpio_read/write should be describe more in PHY centric instead of
display controller centric.
Create a enum dpio_channel for channel index and enum dpio_phy for PHY
index. This should better to gather for upcoming platform.
v2: Rebase the code based on
drm/i915/vlv: Fix typo in the DPIO register define.
v3: Rename vlv_phy to dpio_phy_iosf_port and define additional macro
DPIO_PHY, and remove unrelated change. (Ville)
Suggested-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chon Ming Lee <chon.ming.lee@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
So digging out the right ones is a little easier.
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
The patch doesn't contain functional change, but is to prepare for
future platform which has different DPIO phy. The additional pipe
parameter will use to select which phy to target for.
v2: Update the commit message and add static for the new function.
(Jani/Ville)
Signed-off-by: Chon Ming Lee <chon.ming.lee@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Acked-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
For GPIO NC, CCK, CCU, and GPS CORE.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
We never check the return values, and there's not much we could do on
errors anyway. Just simplify the signatures. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Rename all VLV IOSF sideband register accessor functions to
vlv_<port>_{read,write}. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Both the intel_dpio_{read,write} and valleyview_{punit,nc}_{read,write}
use the IOSF sideband interface. They access the same registers and do
mostly the same stuff, but no shared code. There are even duplicate
register defines for the same registers. Both have locking, but the
former use dpio_lock and the latter rps.hw_lock. It's racy.
This patch refactors the sideband access to a single function that
expects dpio_lock to be held. The dpio_lock is only used for sideband
stuff, so it's a better match than rps.hw_lock for the purpose. The rps
stuff still needs rps.hw_lock, since it's used to protect more than just
the register access, so rps code will need to hold both locks.
Based on the work by Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@intel.com> and Yogesh
Mohan Marimuthu <yogesh.mohan.marimuthu@intel.com>.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Group both the HSW/LPT SBI interface and VLV IOSF sideband register
accessor functions into a new file. No functional changes.
v2: also move intel_sbi_{read,write} (Daniel)
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Chris Wilson