Rework the debug feature calls and initialization. There
are now two debug feature entries used by the zcrypt code.
The first is 'ap' with all the AP bus related stuff and the
second is 'zcrypt' with all the zcrypt and devices and
driver related entries. However, there isn't much traffic on
both debug features. The ap bus code emits only some debug
info and for zcrypt devices on appearance and disappearance
there is an entry written.
The new dbf invocations use the sprintf buffer layout,
whereas the old implementation used the ascii dbf buffer.
There are now 5*8=40 bytes used for each entry, resulting in
5 parameters per call. As the sprintf buffer needs a format
string the first parameter provides this and so up to 4 more
parameters can be used. Alltogehter the new layout should be
much more human readable for customers and test.
Signed-off-by: Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Currently the ap infrastructure only supports one domain at a time.
This feature extends the generic cryptographic device driver to
support multiple cryptographic domains simultaneously.
There are now card and queue devices on the AP bus with independent
card and queue drivers. The new /sys layout is as follows:
/sys/bus/ap
devices
<xx>.<yyyy> -> ../../../devices/ap/card<xx>/<xx>.<yyyy>
...
card<xx> -> ../../../devices/ap/card<xx>
...
drivers
<drv>card
card<xx> -> ../../../../devices/ap/card<xx>
<drv>queue
<xx>.<yyyy> -> ../../../../devices/ap/card<xx>/<xx>.<yyyy>
...
/sys/devices/ap
card<xx>
<xx>.<yyyy>
driver -> ../../../../bus/ap/drivers/<zzz>queue
...
driver -> ../../../bus/ap/drivers/<drv>card
...
The two digit <xx> field is the card number, the four digit <yyyy>
field is the queue number and <drv> is the name of the device driver,
e.g. "cex4".
For compatability /sys/bus/ap/card<xx> for the old layout has to exist,
including the attributes that used to reside there.
With additional contributions from Harald Freudenberger and
Martin Schwidefsky.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Tuchscherer <ingo.tuchscherer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Crypto requests are very different in complexity and thus runtime.
Also various crypto adapters are differ with regard to the execution
time. Crypto requests can be balanced much better when the request
type and eligible crypto adapters are rated in a more precise
granularity. Therefore, request weights and adapter speed rates for
dedicated requests will be introduced.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Tuchscherer <ingo.tuchscherer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Move the ap bus into the kernel and make it general available.
Additionally include the message types and the API layer as a
preparation for the workload management facility.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Tuchscherer <ingo.tuchscherer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Currently, on card response failures a combination of card domain and
domain id is recorded in the kernel messages.
According to the message description only the card id will be recorded.
The domain id is not relevant, since the whole card including all domains
is set offline.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Tuchscherer <ingo.tuchscherer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
ap_bus and zcrypt_api assumed module information to always be present
and initialisation to be done in module loading order (symbol
dependencies). These assumptions don't hold if zcrypt is built-in;
THIS_MODULE will be NULL in this case and init call order is linker
order, i.e. Makefile order.
Fix initialisation order by ordering the object files in the Makefile
according to their dependencies, like the module loader would do.
Fix message type registration by using a dedicated "name" field rather
than piggy-backing on the module ("owner") information. There's no
change to the requirement that module name and msgtype name are
identical. The existing name macros are used.
We don't need any special code for dealing with the drivers being
built-in; the generic module support code already does the right
thing.
Test results:
1. CONFIG_MODULES=y, CONFIG_ZCRYPT=y
KVM: boots, no /sys/bus/ap (expected)
LPAR with CEX5: boots, /sys/bus/ap/devices/card*/type present
2. CONFIG_MODULES=y, CONFIG_ZCRYPT=m=:
KVM: boots, loading zcrypt_cex4 (and ap) fails (expected)
LPAR with CEX5: boots, loading =zcrypt_cex4= succeeds,
/sys/bus/ap/devices/card*/type present after explicit module
loading
3. CONFIG_MODULES unset, CONFIG_ZCRYPT=y:
KVM: boots, no /sys/bus/ap (expected)
LPAR with CEX5: boots, /sys/bus/ap/devices/card*/type present
No further testing (user-space functionality) was done.
Fixes: 3b6245fd303f ("s390/zcrypt: Separate msgtype implementation from card modules.")
Signed-off-by: Sascha Silbe <silbe@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
If a AP device is removed while messages are still pending, the requests
are cancelled by calling the message receive function with an error pointer
for the reply. The message type receive handler recognize this and create
a fake hardware error TYPE82_RSP_CODE / REP82_ERROR_MACHINE_FAILURE.
The message with the hardware error then causes a printk and a return
code of -EAGAIN.
Replace the intricate scheme with an explicit return code for this sitation
and avoid the error message.
Reviewd-by: Ingo Tuchscherer <ingo.tuchscherer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
This feature extends the generic cryptographic device driver (zcrypt)
with a new capability to service EP11 requests for the Crypto Express4S
card in EP11 (Enterprise PKCS#11 mode) coprocessor mode.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Tuchscherer <ingo.tuchscherer@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Msgtype implementations are now separated from card specific modules
and can be dynamically registered. Existing msgtype implementations
are restructured in modules.
Signed-off-by: Holger Dengler <hd@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Harald Freudenberger