Hi Linus,
This is my very first pull-request. I've been working full-time as
a kernel developer for more than two years now. During this time I've
been fixing bugs reported by Coverity all over the tree and, as part
of my work, I'm also contributing to the KSPP. My work in the kernel
community has been supervised by Greg KH and Kees Cook.
OK. So, after the quick introduction above, please, pull the following
patches that mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
These patches are part of the ongoing efforts to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
They have been ignored for a long time (most of them more than 3 months,
even after pinging multiple times), which is the reason why I've created
this tree. Most of them have been baking in linux-next for a whole development
cycle. And with Stephen Rothwell's help, we've had linux-next nag-emails
going out for newly introduced code that triggers -Wimplicit-fallthrough
to avoid gaining more of these cases while we work to remove the ones
that are already present.
I'm happy to let you know that we are getting close to completing this
work. Currently, there are only 32 of 2311 of these cases left to be
addressed in linux-next. I'm auditing every case; I take a look into
the code and analyze it in order to determine if I'm dealing with an
actual bug or a false positive, as explained here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/c2fad584-1705-a5f2-d63c-824e9b96cf50@embeddedor.com/
While working on this, I've found and fixed the following missing
break/return bugs, some of them introduced more than 5 years ago:
84242b82d87850b51b6c5e420fe63509186e5034b5be8531817264235ee7cc5034a5d2479826cc865340f23df8df997abeeb2f10d82373307b00c5e65d25ff7a54a7ed5b3e7dc24bfa8f21ad0eaee6199ba8376ce1dc586a60a1a8e9b186f14e57562b4860747828eac5b974bee9cc44ba91162c930e3d0a
Once this work is finish, we'll be able to universally enable
"-Wimplicit-fallthrough" to avoid any of these kinds of bugs from
entering the kernel again.
Thanks
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=k30z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'Wimplicit-fallthrough-5.2-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gustavoars/linux
Pull Wimplicit-fallthrough updates from Gustavo A. R. Silva:
"Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
This is part of the ongoing efforts to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
Most of them have been baking in linux-next for a whole development
cycle. And with Stephen Rothwell's help, we've had linux-next
nag-emails going out for newly introduced code that triggers
-Wimplicit-fallthrough to avoid gaining more of these cases while we
work to remove the ones that are already present.
We are getting close to completing this work. Currently, there are
only 32 of 2311 of these cases left to be addressed in linux-next. I'm
auditing every case; I take a look into the code and analyze it in
order to determine if I'm dealing with an actual bug or a false
positive, as explained here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/c2fad584-1705-a5f2-d63c-824e9b96cf50@embeddedor.com/
While working on this, I've found and fixed the several missing
break/return bugs, some of them introduced more than 5 years ago.
Once this work is finished, we'll be able to universally enable
"-Wimplicit-fallthrough" to avoid any of these kinds of bugs from
entering the kernel again"
* tag 'Wimplicit-fallthrough-5.2-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gustavoars/linux: (27 commits)
memstick: mark expected switch fall-throughs
drm/nouveau/nvkm: mark expected switch fall-throughs
NFC: st21nfca: Fix fall-through warnings
NFC: pn533: mark expected switch fall-throughs
block: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
ASN.1: mark expected switch fall-through
lib/cmdline.c: mark expected switch fall-throughs
lib: zstd: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
scsi: sym53c8xx_2: sym_nvram: Mark expected switch fall-through
scsi: sym53c8xx_2: sym_hipd: mark expected switch fall-throughs
scsi: ppa: mark expected switch fall-through
scsi: osst: mark expected switch fall-throughs
scsi: lpfc: lpfc_scsi: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
scsi: lpfc: lpfc_nvme: Mark expected switch fall-through
scsi: lpfc: lpfc_nportdisc: Mark expected switch fall-through
scsi: lpfc: lpfc_hbadisc: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
scsi: lpfc: lpfc_els: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
scsi: lpfc: lpfc_ct: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
scsi: imm: mark expected switch fall-throughs
scsi: csiostor: csio_wr: mark expected switch fall-through
...
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that in many cases I placed a /* Fall through */ comment
at the bottom of the case, which what GCC is expecting to find.
In other cases I had to tweak a bit the format of the comments.
This patch suppresses ALL missing-break-in-switch false positives
in fs/afs
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115042 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115043 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115045 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1357430 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115047 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115050 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115051 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1467806 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1467807 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1467811 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115041 ("Missing break in switch")
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
The marshalling of AFS.StoreData, AFS.StoreData64 and YFS.StoreData64 calls
generated by ->setattr() ops for the purpose of expanding a file is
incorrect due to older documentation incorrectly describing the way the RPC
'FileLength' parameter is meant to work.
The older documentation says that this is the length the file is meant to
end up at the end of the operation; however, it was never implemented this
way in any of the servers, but rather the file is truncated down to this
before the write operation is effected, and never expanded to it (and,
indeed, it was renamed to 'TruncPos' in 2014).
Fix this by setting the position parameter to the new file length and doing
a zero-lengh write there.
The bug causes Xwayland to SIGBUS due to unexpected non-expansion of a file
it then mmaps. This can be tested by giving the following test program a
filename in an AFS directory:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <sys/mman.h>
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
char *p;
int fd;
if (argc != 2) {
fprintf(stderr,
"Format: test-trunc-mmap <file>\n");
exit(2);
}
fd = open(argv[1], O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_TRUNC);
if (fd < 0) {
perror(argv[1]);
exit(1);
}
if (ftruncate(fd, 0x140008) == -1) {
perror("ftruncate");
exit(1);
}
p = mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
if (p == MAP_FAILED) {
perror("mmap");
exit(1);
}
p[0] = 'a';
if (munmap(p, 4096) < 0) {
perror("munmap");
exit(1);
}
if (close(fd) < 0) {
perror("close");
exit(1);
}
exit(0);
}
Fixes: 31143d5d51 ("AFS: implement basic file write support")
Reported-by: Jonathan Billings <jsbillin@umich.edu>
Tested-by: Jonathan Billings <jsbillin@umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
A lock type of 0 is "LockRead", which makes the fileserver record an
unintentional read lock on the new file. This will cause problems
later on if the file is the subject of locking operations.
The correct default value should be -1 ("LockNone").
Fix the operation marshalling code to set the value and provide an enum to
symbolise the values whilst we're at it.
Fixes: 30062bd13e ("afs: Implement YFS support in the fs client")
Signed-off-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
In some circumstances, the callback interest pointer is NULL, so in such a
case we can't dereference it when checking to see if the callback is
broken. This causes an oops in some circumstances.
Fix this by replacing the function that worked out the aggregate break
counter with one that actually does the comparison, and then make that
return true (ie. broken) if there is no callback interest as yet (ie. the
pointer is NULL).
Fixes: 68251f0a68 ("afs: Fix whole-volume callback handling")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Implement support for talking to YFS-variant fileservers in the cache
manager and the filesystem client. These implement upgraded services on
the same port as their AFS services.
YFS fileservers provide expanded capabilities over AFS.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Linus Torvalds