1
0
Fork 0
Commit Graph

10 Commits (ba2066351b630f0205ebf725f5c81a2a07a77cd7)

Author SHA1 Message Date
Anders Larsen 891ddb95d0 qnx4fs: add missing KERN_xxx to printk() calls
fixed printk calls to consistently specify a KERN_xxx level.

Signed-off-by: Anders Larsen <al@alarsen.net>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2009-11-09 09:40:57 +01:00
Christoph Hellwig 945ffe54bb qnx4: remove write support
qnx4 wrte support has never been fully implement, is broken since the dawn
of time and hasn't been actively developed since before git history
started.

Instead of letting it further bitrot and complicate API transition (like
the new truncate code) remove it.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Anders Larsen <al@alarsen.net>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-09-23 07:39:30 -07:00
Al Viro 964f536966 fs/qnx4: sanitize includes
fs-internal parts of qnx4_fs.h taken to fs/qnx4/qnx4.h, includes adjusted,
qnx4_fs.h doesn't need unifdef anymore.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11 21:36:12 -04:00
Al Viro 79d2576758 Sanitize qnx4 fsync handling
* have directory operations use mark_buffer_dirty_inode(),
  so that sync_mapping_buffers() would get those.
* make qnx4_write_inode() honour its last argument.
* get rid of insane copies of very ancient "walk the indirect blocks"
  in qnx4/fsync - they never matched the actual fs layout and, fortunately,
  never'd been called.  Again, all this junk is not needed; ->fsync()
  should just do sync_mapping_buffers + sync_inode (and if we implement
  block allocation for qnx4, we'll need to use mark_buffer_dirty_inode()
  for extent blocks)

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11 21:36:11 -04:00
Arjan van de Ven c5ef1c42c5 [PATCH] mark struct inode_operations const 3
Many struct inode_operations in the kernel can be "const".  Marking them const
moves these to the .rodata section, which avoids false sharing with potential
dirty data.  In addition it'll catch accidental writes at compile time to
these shared resources.

Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-02-12 09:48:46 -08:00
Josef Sipek 24e23c24e7 [PATCH] struct path: convert qnx4
Signed-off-by: Josef Sipek <jsipek@fsl.cs.sunysb.edu>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-12-08 08:28:48 -08:00
Jörn Engel 6ab3d5624e Remove obsolete #include <linux/config.h>
Signed-off-by: Jörn Engel <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
2006-06-30 19:25:36 +02:00
Arjan van de Ven 4b6f5d20b0 [PATCH] Make most file operations structs in fs/ const
This is a conversion to make the various file_operations structs in fs/
const.  Basically a regexp job, with a few manual fixups

The goal is both to increase correctness (harder to accidentally write to
shared datastructures) and reducing the false sharing of cachelines with
things that get dirty in .data (while .rodata is nicely read only and thus
cache clean)

Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-03-28 09:16:06 -08:00
Alexey Dobriyan 75043cb5b3 [PATCH] fs/qnx4/*: fix sparse warnings
This patch fixes sparse warnings in the qnx4fs (and might even make
qnx4fs work on big-endian boxes)

Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@mail.ru>
Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <domen@coderock.org>
Signed-off-by: Anders Larsen <al@alarsen.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-24 14:14:24 -07:00
Linus Torvalds 1da177e4c3 Linux-2.6.12-rc2
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00