Commit graph

232 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Rafael J. Wysocki cecdb193c8 ACPI / scan: Change the implementation of acpi_bus_trim()
The current acpi_bus_trim() implementation is not really
straightforward and may be simplified significantly by using
acpi_walk_namespace() with acpi_bus_remove() as a post-order
callback.

Observe that acpi_bus_remove(), as called by acpi_bus_trim(), cannot
actually fail, because its first argument is guaranteed not to be
NULL thanks to the acpi_bus_get_device() check in acpi_bus_trim(),
so simply move the acpi_bus_get_device() check to acpi_bus_remove()
and use acpi_walk_namespace() to execute it for every device under
start->handle as a post-order callback.  The, run it directly for
start->handle itself.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
2013-01-15 13:24:02 +01:00
Rafael J. Wysocki ae281795ec ACPI / scan: Drop the second argument of acpi_bus_trim()
All callers of acpi_bus_trim() pass 1 (true) as the second argument
of it, so remove that argument entirely and change acpi_bus_trim()
to always behave as though it were 1.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
2013-01-15 13:23:53 +01:00
Rafael J. Wysocki b17b537ac1 ACPI / scan: Drop the second argument of acpi_device_unregister()
Drop the second argument of acpi_device_unregister(), type, which is
not used by that function.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
2013-01-15 13:23:44 +01:00
Mika Westerberg abe99210e0 ACPI / scan: Fix check of device_attach() return value.
Since device_attach() returns 1 on success (a driver has been bound
to the device), the check against its return value in
acpi_bus_device_attach() should modified to take that into accout.
Make it so.

[rjw: Subject and changelog.]
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-01-11 22:08:09 +01:00
Rafael J. Wysocki f95988de06 ACPI / scan: Treat power resources in a special way
Commit 805d410 (ACPI: Separate adding ACPI device objects from
probing ACPI drivers) introduced an ACPI power resources management
regression, because it didn't ensure that the power resources
driver bind to the struct acpi_device objects corresponding
to power resources as soon as they were created.  As a result,
ACPI power management routines may attempt to access power resource
objects before they are ready to use.

To fix this problem, tell the acpi_add_single_object() in
acpi_bus_check_add() to probe the driver for objects of type
ACPI_BUS_TYPE_POWER.  This fix has been verified to work on
HP nx6325 where the problem was first observed.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-01-07 21:17:02 +01:00
Rafael J. Wysocki 3eec5f7a19 ACPI: Drop ACPI device .bind() and .unbind() callbacks
Drop the .bind() and .unbind() that have no more users from
struct acpi_device_ops and remove all of the code referring to
them from drivers/acpi/scan.c.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-01-03 13:09:42 +01:00
Rafael J. Wysocki 0cd6ac52b3 ACPI: Make acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_add() take only one argument
The callers of acpi_bus_add() usually assume that if it has
succeeded, then a struct acpi_device object has been attached to
the handle passed as the first argument.  Unfortunately, however,
this assumption is wrong, because acpi_bus_scan(), and acpi_bus_add()
too as a result, may return a pointer to a different struct
acpi_device object on success (it may be an object corresponding to
one of the descendant ACPI nodes in the namespace scope below that
handle).

For this reason, the callers of acpi_bus_add() who care about
whether or not a struct acpi_device object has been created for
its first argument need to check that using acpi_bus_get_device()
anyway, so the second argument of acpi_bus_add() is not really
useful for them.  The same observation applies to acpi_bus_scan()
executed directly from acpi_scan_init().

Therefore modify the relevant callers of acpi_bus_add() to check the
existence of the struct acpi_device in question with the help of
acpi_bus_get_device() and drop the no longer necessary second
argument of acpi_bus_add().  Accordingly, modify acpi_scan_init() to
use acpi_bus_get_device() to get acpi_root and drop the no longer
needed second argument of acpi_bus_scan().

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-01-03 13:09:40 +01:00
Rafael J. Wysocki 209d3b1743 ACPI: Replace ACPI device add_type field with a match_driver flag
After the removal of the second argument of acpi_bus_scan() there is
no difference between the ACPI_BUS_ADD_MATCH and ACPI_BUS_ADD_START
add types, so the add_type field in struct acpi_device may be
replaced with a single flag.  Do that calling the flag match_driver.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-01-03 13:09:40 +01:00
Rafael J. Wysocki e3863094c6 ACPI: Drop the second argument of acpi_bus_scan()
After the removal of acpi_start_single_object() and acpi_bus_start()
the second argument of acpi_bus_scan() is not necessary any more,
so drop it and update acpi_bus_check_add() accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-01-03 13:09:39 +01:00
Rafael J. Wysocki 636458de36 ACPI: Remove the arguments of acpi_bus_add() that are not used
Notice that acpi_bus_add() uses only 2 of its 4 arguments and
redefine its header to match the body.  Update all of its callers as
necessary and observe that this leads to quite a number of removed
lines of code (Linus will like that).

Add a kerneldoc comment documenting acpi_bus_add() and wonder how
its callers make wrong assumptions about the second argument (make
note to self to take care of that later).

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-01-03 13:09:39 +01:00
Rafael J. Wysocki 02f57c67a8 ACPI: Remove acpi_start_single_object() and acpi_bus_start()
The ACPI PCI root bridge driver was the only ACPI driver implementing
the .start() callback, which isn't used by any ACPI drivers any more
now.

For this reason, acpi_start_single_object() has no purpose any more,
so remove it and all references to it.  Also remove
acpi_bus_start_device(), whose only purpose was to call
acpi_start_single_object().

Moreover, since after the removal of acpi_bus_start_device() the
only purpose of acpi_bus_start() remains to call
acpi_update_all_gpes(), move that into acpi_bus_add() and drop
acpi_bus_start() too, remove its header from acpi_bus.h and
update all of its former users accordingly.

This change was previously proposed in a different from by
Yinghai Lu.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-01-03 13:09:39 +01:00
Rafael J. Wysocki 4002bf384c ACPI: Change the ordering of acpi_bus_check_add()
If acpi_bus_check_add() is called for a handle already having an
existing struct acpi_device object attached, it is not necessary to
check the type and status of the device correspondig to it, so
change the ordering of acpi_bus_check_add() to avoid that.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-01-03 13:09:38 +01:00
Rafael J. Wysocki a2d06a1a08 ACPI: Replace struct acpi_bus_ops with enum type
Notice that one member of struct acpi_bus_ops, acpi_op_add, is not
used anywhere any more and the relationship between its remaining
members, acpi_op_match and acpi_op_start, is such that it doesn't
make sense to set the latter without setting the former at the same
time.  Therefore, replace struct acpi_bus_ops with new a enum type,
enum acpi_bus_add_type, with three values, ACPI_BUS_ADD_BASIC,
ACPI_BUS_ADD_MATCH, ACPI_BUS_ADD_START, corresponding to
both acpi_op_match and acpi_op_start unset, acpi_op_match set and
acpi_op_start unset, and both acpi_op_match and acpi_op_start set,
respectively.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-01-03 13:09:38 +01:00
Rafael J. Wysocki ca7b3c4f3d ACPI: Reduce the usage of struct acpi_bus_ops
Objects of type struct acpi_bus_ops are currently used to pass
information between different parts of the ACPI namespace scanning
code, sometimes in quite convoluted ways.  It turns out that that
is not necessary in some cases, so simplify the code by reducing
the utilization of struct acpi_bus_ops objects where clearly
possible.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-01-03 13:09:37 +01:00
Rafael J. Wysocki 0fc300b053 ACPI: Make acpi_bus_add() and acpi_bus_start() visibly different
The current ACPI namespace scanning code suggests that acpi_bus_add()
and acpi_bus_start() share some code.  In fact, however, they are
completely different code paths (except for the initial checks), so
refactor the code to make that distinction visibly clear.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-01-03 13:09:37 +01:00
Rafael J. Wysocki 92ef2a25c7 ACPI: Change the ordering of PCI root bridge driver registrarion
Instead of running acpi_pci_root_init() from a separate subsys
initcall, call it directly from acpi_scan_init() before scanning the
ACPI namespace for the first time, so that the PCI root bridge
driver's .add() routine, acpi_pci_root_start(), is always run
before binding ACPI drivers or attaching "companion" device objects
to struct acpi_device objects below the root bridge's device node in
the ACPI namespace.

The first, simpler reason for doing this is that it makes the
situation during boot more similar to the situation during hotplug,
in which the ACPI PCI root bridge driver is always present.

The second reason is that acpi_pci_root_init() causes struct pci_dev
objects to be created for all PCI devices below the bridge and
these objects may be necessary for whatever is done with the other
ACPI device nodes in that namespace scope.  For example, devices
created by acpi_create_platform_device() sometimes may need to be
added to the device hierarchy as children of PCI bridges.  For this
purpose, however, the struct pci_dev objects representing those
bridges need to exist before the platform devices in question are
registered.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-01-03 13:09:37 +01:00
Rafael J. Wysocki 805d410fb0 ACPI: Separate adding ACPI device objects from probing ACPI drivers
Split the ACPI namespace scanning for devices into two passes, such
that struct acpi_device objects are registerd in the first pass
without probing ACPI drivers and the drivers are probed against them
directly in the second pass.

There are two main reasons for doing that.

First, the ACPI PCI root bridge driver's .add() routine,
acpi_pci_root_add(), causes struct pci_dev objects to be created for
all PCI devices under the given root bridge.  Usually, there are
corresponding ACPI device nodes in the ACPI namespace for some of
those devices and therefore there should be "companion" struct
acpi_device objects to attach those struct pci_dev objects to.  These
struct acpi_device objects should exist when the corresponding
struct pci_dev objects are created, but that is only guaranteed
during boot and not during hotplug.  This leads to a number of
functional differences between the boot and the hotplug cases which
are not strictly necessary and make the code more complicated.

For example, this forces the ACPI PCI root bridge driver to defer the
registration of the just created struct pci_dev objects and to use a
special .start() callback routine, acpi_pci_root_start(), to make
sure that all of the "companion" struct acpi_device objects will be
present at PCI devices registration time during hotplug.

If those differences can be eliminated, we will be able to
consolidate the boot and hotplug code paths for the enumeration and
registration of PCI devices and to reduce the complexity of that
code quite a bit.

The second reason is that, in general, it should be possible to
resolve conflicts of resources assigned by the BIOS to different
devices represented by ACPI namespace nodes before any drivers bind
to them and before they are attached to "companion" objects
representing physical devices (such as struct pci_dev).  However, for
this purpose we first need to enumerate all ACPI device nodes in the
given namespace scope.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-01-03 13:09:36 +01:00
Rafael J. Wysocki 1a14f30b36 Merge branch 'acpi-general'
* acpi-general:
  pnpacpi: fix incorrect TEST_ALPHA() test
  ACPI / video: ignore BIOS initial backlight value for HP Folio 13-2000
  ACPI : do not use Lid and Sleep button for S5 wakeup
2012-12-07 23:14:35 +01:00
Rafael J. Wysocki 583bdc5982 Merge branch 'acpi-enumeration'
* acpi-enumeration:
  ACPI: add Haswell LPSS devices to acpi_platform_device_ids list
  ACPI: add documentation about ACPI 5 enumeration
2012-12-07 23:14:25 +01:00
Mika Westerberg 5e7779f039 ACPI: add Haswell LPSS devices to acpi_platform_device_ids list
All devices behind Haswell LPSS (Low Power Subsystem) should be represented
as platform devices so add them to the acpi_platform_device_ids list.

Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-12-07 23:12:01 +01:00
Zhang Rui b7e383046c ACPI : do not use Lid and Sleep button for S5 wakeup
When system enters power off, the _PSW of Lid device is enabled.
But this may cause the system to reboot instead of power off.

A proper way to fix this is to always disable lid wakeup capability for S5.

References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35262
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-12-04 23:23:16 +01:00
Rafael J. Wysocki d4c091f13d Merge branch 'acpi-general'
* acpi-general: (38 commits)
  ACPI / thermal: _TMP and _CRT/_HOT/_PSV/_ACx dependency fix
  ACPI: drop unnecessary local variable from acpi_system_write_wakeup_device()
  ACPI: Fix logging when no pci_irq is allocated
  ACPI: Update Dock hotplug error messages
  ACPI: Update Container hotplug error messages
  ACPI: Update Memory hotplug error messages
  ACPI: Update CPU hotplug error messages
  ACPI: Add acpi_handle_<level>() interfaces
  ACPI: remove use of __devexit
  ACPI / PM: Add Sony Vaio VPCEB1S1E to nonvs blacklist.
  ACPI / battery: Correct battery capacity values on Thinkpads
  Revert "ACPI / x86: Add quirk for "CheckPoint P-20-00" to not use bridge _CRS_ info"
  ACPI: create _SUN sysfs file
  ACPI / memhotplug: bind the memory device when the driver is being loaded
  ACPI / memhotplug: don't allow to eject the memory device if it is being used
  ACPI / memhotplug: free memory device if acpi_memory_enable_device() failed
  ACPI / memhotplug: fix memory leak when memory device is unbound from acpi_memhotplug
  ACPI / memhotplug: deal with eject request in hotplug queue
  ACPI / memory-hotplug: add memory offline code to acpi_memory_device_remove()
  ACPI / memory-hotplug: call acpi_bus_trim() to remove memory device
  ...

Conflicts:
	include/linux/acpi.h (two additions at the end of the same file)
2012-11-29 21:43:06 +01:00
Rafael J. Wysocki 08ab72980a Merge branch 'acpica'
* acpica: (26 commits)
  ACPICA: Update version to 20121018
  ACPICA: AcpiGetObjectInfo: Add support for ACPI 5 _SUB method
  ACPICA: Update for 64-bit generation of recent error message changes
  ACPICA: Fix externalize name to complete migration to ACPI_MOVE_NAME
  ACPICA: Add starting offset parameter to common dump buffer routine
  ACPICA: Deploy ACPI_MOVE_NAME across ACPICA source base
  ACPICA: Update support for ACPI 5 MPST table
  ACPICA: Enhance error reporting for invalid opcodes and bad ACPI_NAMEs
  ACPICA: Add ACPI_MOVE_NAME macro to optimize 4-byte ACPI_NAME copies
  ACPICA: AcpiExec: Improve algorithm for tracking memory leaks
  ACPICA: Add debug print message for mutex objects that are force-released
  ACPICA: Resource Mgr: Small fix for buffer size calculation
  ACPICA: Remove extra spaces after periods in the Intel license
  ACPICA: Remove extra spaces after periods within comments
  ACPICA: Update local C library module comments for ASCII table
  ACPICA: Fix for predefined name loop during ACPICA initialization
  ACPICA: Fix some typos in comments
  ACPICA: ACPICA core: Cleanup empty lines at file start and end
  ACPICA: Audit/update for ACPICA return macros and debug depth counter
  ACPICA: Fix unmerged acmacros.h divergences.
  ...
2012-11-29 21:41:41 +01:00
Rafael J. Wysocki 45c36462ae Merge branch 'acpi-dev-pm' into acpi-enumeration
Subsequent commits in this branch will depend on 'acpi-dev-pm'
material.
2012-11-27 13:42:42 +01:00
Adrian Hunter 142b007b65 ACPI: add SDHCI to ACPI platform devices
Add the generic ACPI SDHCI device ID to acpi_platform_device_ids[]
to make the ACPI core create a platform device object for the ACPI
device node of that ID.

[rjw: Added the changelog.]
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-11-23 21:11:47 +01:00
Aaron Lu 1399dfcdfe ACPI / PM: Introduce os_accessible flag for power_state
Currently we have valid flag to represent if this ACPI device power
state is valid. A device power state is valid does not necessarily
mean we, as OSPM, has a mean to put the device into that power state,
e.g. D3 cold is always a valid power state for any ACPI device, but if
there is no _PS3 or _PRx for this device, we can't really put that
device into D3 cold power state. The same is true for D0 power state.

So here comes the os_accessible flag, which is only set if the device
has provided us the required means to put it into that power state,
e.g. if we have _PS3 or _PRx, we can put the device into D3 cold state
and thus, D3 cold power state's os_accessible flag will be set in this
case.

And a new wrapper inline function is added to be used to check if
firmware has provided us a way to power off the device during runtime.

Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-11-21 23:33:40 +01:00
Rafael J. Wysocki 95f8a082b9 ACPI / driver core: Introduce struct acpi_dev_node and related macros
To avoid adding an ACPI handle pointer to struct device on
architectures that don't use ACPI, or generally when CONFIG_ACPI is
not set, in which cases that pointer is useless, define struct
acpi_dev_node that will contain the handle pointer if CONFIG_ACPI is
set and will be empty otherwise and use it to represent the ACPI
device node field in struct device.

In addition to that define macros for reading and setting the ACPI
handle of a device that don't generate code when CONFIG_ACPI is
unset.  Modify the ACPI subsystem to use those macros instead of
referring to the given device's ACPI handle directly.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2012-11-21 00:21:50 +01:00
Yasuaki Ishimatsu bb74ac23b1 ACPI: create _SUN sysfs file
_SUN method provides the slot unique-ID in the ACPI namespace. And The value
is written in Advanced Configuration and Power Interface Specification as
follows:

"The _SUN value is required to be unique among the slots ofthe same type.
It is also recommended that this number match the slot number printed on
the physical slot whenever possible."

So if we can know the value, we can identify the physical position of the
slot in the system.

The patch creates "sun" file in sysfs for identifying physical position
of the slot.

Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-11-16 02:56:59 +01:00
Lv Zheng 78e25fef27 ACPICA: Fix divergences of definition conflicts.
There are conflicts in the "acpi_device_id*" definitions between the
Linux and the ACPICA.  The definitions of acpi_device_id* in ACPICA
have been changed to the "acpi_pnp_device_id*".  This patch changes
the corresponding "acpica_device_id*" definitiions in the Linux.

This patch will not affect the generated vmlinx binary.
This will decrease 298 lines of 20120913 divergence.diff.

Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-11-15 00:31:22 +01:00
Mika Westerberg 91e5687805 ACPI: Add support for platform bus type
With ACPI 5 it is now possible to enumerate traditional SoC
peripherals, like serial bus controllers and slave devices behind
them.  These devices are typically based on IP-blocks used in many
existing SoC platforms and platform drivers for them may already
be present in the kernel tree.

To make driver "porting" more straightforward, add ACPI support to
the platform bus type.  Instead of writing ACPI "glue" drivers for
the existing platform drivers, register the platform bus type with
ACPI to create platform device objects for the drivers and bind the
corresponding ACPI handles to those platform devices.

This should allow us to reuse the existing platform drivers for the
devices in question with the minimum amount of modifications.

This changeset is based on Mika Westerberg's and Mathias Nyman's
work.

Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Acked-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-11-15 00:28:01 +01:00
Mika Westerberg cf761af9ee ACPI: Provide generic functions for matching ACPI device nodes
Introduce function acpi_match_device() allowing callers to match
struct device objects with populated acpi_handle fields against
arrays of ACPI device IDs.  Also introduce function
acpi_driver_match_device() using acpi_match_device() internally and
allowing callers to match a struct device object against an array of
ACPI device IDs provided by a device driver.

Additionally, introduce macro ACPI_PTR() that may be used by device
drivers to escape pointers to data structures whose definitions
depend on CONFIG_ACPI.

Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Acked-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-11-15 00:28:00 +01:00
Toshi Kani 61622accd0 ACPI: Export functions for hot-remove
Exported acpi_os_hotplug_execute() and acpi_bus_hot_remove_device()
so that they can be called from modules for hot-remove operations.

Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-11-15 00:16:04 +01:00
Lv Zheng 923d4a45a9 ACPI: Add user space interface for identification objects
ACPI devices are glued with physical devices through _ADR object, ACPI
enumerated devices are identified with _UID object.  Currently we can
observe _HID/_CID through sysfs interfaces (hid/modalias), but there's
no way for us to check _ADR/_UID from user space.  This patch closes
this gap for ACPI developers and users.

[rjw: Modified the subject and changelog slightly.]
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-11-15 00:16:03 +01:00
Lv Zheng ccf7804026 ACPI: Add _UID support for ACPI devices.
The _UID object is optional, but is required when the device has no
other way to report a persistent unique device ID.
This patch is required for ACPI 5.0 ACPI enumerated IP cores.

Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rui Zhang <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-11-15 00:16:03 +01:00
Toshi Kani f4fa0e018a ACPI: Remove unused lockable in acpi_device_flags
Removed lockable in struct acpi_device_flags since it is no
longer used by any code. acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() cannot
use this flag because acpi_bus_trim() frees up its acpi_device
object. Furthermore, the dock driver calls _LCK method without
using this lockable flag.

Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-11-15 00:16:02 +01:00
Toshi Kani b3c450c380 ACPI: Fix stale pointer access to flags.lockable
During hot-remove, acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() calls ACPI _LCK
method when device->flags.lockable is set. However, this device
pointer is stale since the target acpi_device object has been
already kfree'd by acpi_bus_trim().

The flags.lockable indicates whether or not this ACPI object
implements _LCK method. Fix the stable pointer access by replacing
it with acpi_get_handle() to check if _LCK is implemented.

Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-11-15 00:16:01 +01:00
Len Brown 3f44ea0d1c Merge branches 'acpica', 'acpidump', 'intel-idle', 'misc', 'module_acpi_driver-simplify', 'turbostat' and 'usb3' into release
add acpidump utility
intel_idle driver now supports IVB Xeon
turbostat can now count SMIs
ACPI can now bind to USB3 hubs
misc fixes
2012-10-06 16:00:32 -04:00
Lance Ortiz d1efe3c324 ACPI: Add new sysfs interface to export device description
Add support to export the device description obtained from the ACPI _STR
method, if one exists for a device, to user-space via a sysfs interface.
This new interface provides a standard and platform neutral way for users
to obtain the description text stored in the ACPI _STR method.  If no
_STR method exists for the device, no sysfs 'description' file will be
created.  The 'description' file will be located in the /sys/devices/
directory using the device's path.

/sys/device/<bus>/<bridge path>/<device path>.../firmware_node/description

Example:

/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00.07.0/0000:0e:00.0/firmware_node/description

It can also be located using the ACPI device path, for example:

/sys/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/device:00/ACPI0004:00/PNP0A08:00/device:13/device:15/description
/sys/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/device:00/ACPI0004:00/ACPI0004:01/ACPI0007:02/description

Execute the 'cat' command on the 'description' file to obtain the
description string for that device.

This patch also includes documentation describing how the new sysfs
interface works

Changes from v1-v2 based on comments by Len Brown and Fengguang Wu
* Removed output "No Description" and leaving a NULL attribute if the
_STR method failed to evaluate.

* In acpi_device_remove_files() removed the redundent check of
dev->pnp.str_obj before calling free.  This check triggered a message
from smatch.

Signed-off-by: Lance Ortiz <lance.ortiz@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2012-10-06 15:52:16 -04:00
Lan Tianyu 1033f9041d ACPI: Allow ACPI binding with USB-3.0 hub
A USB port's position and connectability can't be identified on some boards
via USB hub registers. ACPI _UPC and _PLD can help to resolve this issue
and so it is necessary to bind USB with ACPI. This patch is to allow ACPI
binding with USB-3.0 hub.

Current ACPI only can bind one struct-device to one ACPI device node.
This can not work with USB-3.0 hub, because the USB-3.0 hub has two logical
devices. Each works for USB-2.0 and USB-3.0 devices. In the Linux USB subsystem,
those two logical hubs are treated as two seperate devices that have two struct
devices. But in the ACPI DSDT, these two logical hubs share one ACPI device
node. So there is a requirement to bind multi struct-devices to one ACPI
device node. This patch is to resolve such problem.

Following is the ACPI device nodes' description under xhci hcd.

Device (XHC)
            Device (RHUB)
                Device (HSP1)
                Device (HSP2)
                Device (HSP3)
                Device (HSP4)
                Device (SSP1)
                Device (SSP2)
                Device (SSP3)
                Device (SSP4)

Topology in the Linux

	device XHC
	   USB-2.0 logical hub    USB-3.0 logical hub
		HSP1			SSP1
		HSP2			SSP2
		HSP3			SSP3
		HSP4			SSP4

This patch also modifies the output of /proc/acpi/wakeup. One ACPI node
can be associated with multiple devices:

XHC		S4	*enabled	pci:0000:00:14.0
RHUB	S0	disabled	usb:usb1
			disabled	usb:usb2

Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
Acked-by: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2012-09-21 13:30:29 -04:00
Linus Torvalds 476525004a Merge branch 'release' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux
Pull ACPI & power management update from Len Brown:
 "Re-write of the turbostat tool.
     lower overhead was necessary for measuring very large system when
     they are very idle.

  IVB support in intel_idle
     It's what I run on my IVB, others should be able to also:-)

  ACPICA core update
     We have found some bugs due to divergence between Linux and the
     upstream ACPICA base.  Most of these patches are to reduce that
     divergence to reduce the risk of future bugs.

  Some cpuidle updates, mostly for non-Intel
     More will be coming, as they depend on this part.

  Some thermal management changes needed by non-ACPI systems.

  Some _OST (OS Status Indication) updates for hot ACPI hot-plug."

* 'release' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux: (51 commits)
  Thermal: Documentation update
  Thermal: Add Hysteresis attributes
  Thermal: Make Thermal trip points writeable
  ACPI/AC: prevent OOPS on some boxes due to missing check power_supply_register() return value check
  tools/power: turbostat: fix large c1% issue
  tools/power: turbostat v2 - re-write for efficiency
  ACPICA: Update to version 20120711
  ACPICA: AcpiSrc: Fix some translation issues for Linux conversion
  ACPICA: Update header files copyrights to 2012
  ACPICA: Add new ACPI table load/unload external interfaces
  ACPICA: Split file: tbxface.c -> tbxfload.c
  ACPICA: Add PCC address space to space ID decode function
  ACPICA: Fix some comment fields
  ACPICA: Table manager: deploy new firmware error/warning interfaces
  ACPICA: Add new interfaces for BIOS(firmware) errors and warnings
  ACPICA: Split exception code utilities to a new file, utexcep.c
  ACPI: acpi_pad: tune round_robin_time
  ACPICA: Update to version 20120620
  ACPICA: Add support for implicit notify on multiple devices
  ACPICA: Update comments; no functional change
  ...
2012-07-26 14:28:55 -07:00
Len Brown ec033d0a02 Merge branches 'acpi_pad', 'acpica', 'apei-bugzilla-43282', 'battery', 'cpuidle-coupled', 'cpuidle-tweaks', 'intel_idle-ivb', 'ost', 'red-hat-bz-772730', 'thermal', 'thermal-spear' and 'turbostat-v2' into release 2012-07-26 00:03:58 -04:00
Rafael J. Wysocki d91ee328c1 ACPI / PM: Drop PM callbacks from the ACPI bus type
Since the ACPI bus type's PM callbacks only execute the driver ones
without doing anything else, they can be dropped, because the driver
callbacks will be executed by the PM core directly if bus type
(or other subsystem) callbacks are not present.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2012-07-01 13:31:06 +02:00
Rafael J. Wysocki 13db85528f ACPI / PM: Do not execute legacy driver PM callbacks
Since all ACPI drivers in the tree should have been switched
to power management handling based on struct dev_pm_ops,
modify the ACPI bus type driver so that is doesn't execute
legacy driver power management callbacks from the functions
pointed to by the members of the acpi_bus_pm structure.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2012-07-01 13:31:06 +02:00
Rafael J. Wysocki 67699c5f0c ACPI / PM: Make acpi_bus_type use driver struct dev_pm_ops callbacks
Modify acpi_bus_type so that it executes PM callbacks provided
by drivers through their struct dev_pm_ops objects, if present,
while still allowing the legacy ACPI PM callbacks to take precedence.
This will make it possible to convert ACPI drivers one by one to
handling PM through struct dev_pm_ops instead of the legacy way.

The code added by this change is temporary and will be removed
when all of the drivers in question have been switched over to
the PM handling based on struct dev_pm_ops.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2012-07-01 13:30:59 +02:00
Rafael J. Wysocki 707156e600 ACPI / PM: Make acpi_bus_type use struct dev_pm_ops for PM handling
Make the acpi_bus_type bus type define its PM callbacks through
a struct dev_pm_ops object rather than by using legacy PM hooks
in struct bus_type.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2012-07-01 13:30:58 +02:00
Rafael J. Wysocki 17621e11fd ACPI / PM: Drop pm_message_t argument from device suspend callback
None of the drivers implementing the ACPI device suspend callback
uses the pm_message_t argument of it, so this argument may be dropped
entirely from that callback.  This will simplify switching the ACPI
bus type to PM handling based on struct dev_pm_ops.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2012-07-01 13:30:58 +02:00
Toshi Kani c4753e57b7 ACPI: Add _OST support for sysfs eject
Changed acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() to support _OST. This function is
also changed to global so that it can be called from hotplug notify
handlers to perform hot-remove operation.

Changed acpi_eject_store(), which is the sysfs eject handler. It checks
eject_pending to see if the request was originated from ACPI eject
notification. If not, it calls _OST(0x103,84,) per Figure 6-37 in ACPI
5.0 spec.

Added eject_pending bit to acpi_device_flags. This bit is set when the
kernel has received an ACPI eject notification, but does not initiate
its hot-remove operation by itself.

Added struct acpi_eject_event. This structure is used to pass extended
information to acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(), which has a single argument
to support asynchronous call

Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2012-06-04 01:09:19 -04:00
Daniel Drake c10d7a1384 ACPI / PM: Generate wakeup events on fixed power button
When the system is woken up by the ACPI fixed power button, currently there
is no way of userspace becoming aware that the power button was pressed.

OLPC would like to know this, so that we can respond appropriately.
For example, if the system was woken up by a network packet, we know
we can go back to sleep very quickly. But if the user explicitly woke the
system with the power button, we're going to want to stay awake for a
while.

The wakeup count mechanism seems like a good fit for communicating this.
Mark the fixed power button as wakeup-enabled, and increment its wakeup
counter when the system is woken with the power button. (The wakeup counter
is also incremented when the power button is pressed during system
operation; this is already handled by an existing acpi-button codepath).

Signed-off-by: Daniel Drake <dsd@laptop.org>
Acked-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2012-05-29 21:20:23 +02:00
Rafael J. Wysocki 5c7dd710f6 ACPI / PCI / PM: Fix device PM regression related to D3hot/D3cold
Commit 1cc0c998fd ("ACPI: Fix D3hot v D3cold confusion") introduced a
bug in __acpi_bus_set_power() and changed the behavior of
acpi_pci_set_power_state() in such a way that it generally doesn't work
as expected if PCI_D3hot is passed to it as the second argument.

First off, if ACPI_STATE_D3 (equal to ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD) is passed to
__acpi_bus_set_power() and the explicit_set flag is set for the D3cold
state, the function will try to execute AML method called "_PS4", which
doesn't exist.

Fix this by adding a check to ensure that the name of the AML method
to execute for transitions to ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD is correct in
__acpi_bus_set_power().  Also make sure that the explicit_set flag
for ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD will be set if _PS3 is present and modify
acpi_power_transition() to avoid accessing power resources for
ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD, because they don't exist.

Second, if PCI_D3hot is passed to acpi_pci_set_power_state() as the
target state, the function will request a transition to
ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT instead of ACPI_STATE_D3.  However,
ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT is now only marked as supported if the _PR3 AML
method is defined for the given device, which is rare.  This causes
problems to happen on systems where devices were successfully put
into ACPI D3 by pci_set_power_state(PCI_D3hot) which doesn't work
now.  In particular, some unused graphics adapters are not turned
off as a result.

To fix this issue restore the old behavior of
acpi_pci_set_power_state(), which is to request a transition to
ACPI_STATE_D3 (equal to ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD) if either PCI_D3hot or
PCI_D3cold is passed to it as the argument.

This approach is not ideal, because generally power should not
be removed from devices if PCI_D3hot is the target power state,
but since this behavior is relied on, we have no choice but to
restore it at the moment and spend more time on designing a
better solution in the future.

References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43228
Reported-by: rocko <rockorequin@hotmail.com>
Reported-by: Cristian Rodríguez <crrodriguez@opensuse.org>
Reported-and-tested-by: Peter <lekensteyn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-05-17 16:16:16 -07:00
Lin Ming 1cc0c998fd ACPI: Fix D3hot v D3cold confusion
Before this patch, ACPI_STATE_D3 incorrectly referenced D3hot
in some places, but D3cold in other places.

After this patch, ACPI_STATE_D3 always means ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD;
and all references to D3hot use ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT.

ACPI's _PR3 method is used to enter both D3hot and D3cold states.
What distinguishes D3hot from D3cold is the presence _PR3
(Power Resources for D3hot)  If these resources are all ON,
then the state is D3hot.  If _PR3 is not present,
or all _PR0 resources for the devices are OFF,
then the state is D3cold.

This patch applies after Linux-3.4-rc1.
A future syntax cleanup may remove ACPI_STATE_D3
to emphasize that it always means ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD.

Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2012-05-05 01:19:52 -04:00