As of my previous change titled "Btrfs: fix scrub preventing unused block
groups from being deleted", the following warning at
extent-tree.c:btrfs_delete_unused_bgs() can be hit when we mount the a
filesysten with "-o discard":
10263 void btrfs_delete_unused_bgs(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
10264 {
(...)
10405 if (trimming) {
10406 WARN_ON(!list_empty(&block_group->bg_list));
10407 spin_lock(&trans->transaction->deleted_bgs_lock);
10408 list_move(&block_group->bg_list,
10409 &trans->transaction->deleted_bgs);
10410 spin_unlock(&trans->transaction->deleted_bgs_lock);
10411 btrfs_get_block_group(block_group);
10412 }
(...)
This happens because scrub can now add back the block group to the list of
unused block groups (fs_info->unused_bgs). This is dangerous because we
are moving the block group from the unused block groups list to the list
of deleted block groups without holding the lock that protects the source
list (fs_info->unused_bgs_lock).
The following diagram illustrates how this happens:
CPU 1 CPU 2
cleaner_kthread()
btrfs_delete_unused_bgs()
sees bg X in list
fs_info->unused_bgs
deletes bg X from list
fs_info->unused_bgs
scrub_enumerate_chunks()
searches device tree using
its commit root
finds device extent for
block group X
gets block group X from the tree
fs_info->block_group_cache_tree
(via btrfs_lookup_block_group())
sets bg X to RO (again)
scrub_chunk(bg X)
sets bg X back to RW mode
adds bg X to the list
fs_info->unused_bgs again,
since it's still unused and
currently not in that list
sets bg X to RO mode
btrfs_remove_chunk(bg X)
--> discard is enabled and bg X
is in the fs_info->unused_bgs
list again so the warning is
triggered
--> we move it from that list into
the transaction's delete_bgs
list, but we can have another
task currently manipulating
the first list (fs_info->unused_bgs)
Fix this by using the same lock (fs_info->unused_bgs_lock) to protect both
the list of unused block groups and the list of deleted block groups. This
makes it safe and there's not much worry for more lock contention, as this
lock is seldom used and only the cleaner kthread adds elements to the list
of deleted block groups. The warning goes away too, as this was previously
an impossible case (and would have been better a BUG_ON/ASSERT) but it's
not impossible anymore.
Reproduced with fstest btrfs/073 (using MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o discard").
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
It's possible to reach a state where the cleaner kthread isn't able to
start a transaction to delete an unused block group due to lack of enough
free metadata space and due to lack of unallocated device space to allocate
a new metadata block group as well. If this happens try to use space from
the global block group reserve just like we do for unlink operations, so
that we don't reach a permanent state where starting a transaction for
filesystem operations (file creation, renames, etc) keeps failing with
-ENOSPC. Such an unfortunate state was observed on a machine where over
a dozen unused data block groups existed and the cleaner kthread was
failing to delete them due to ENOSPC error when attempting to start a
transaction, and even running balance with a -dusage=0 filter failed with
ENOSPC as well. Also unmounting and mounting again the filesystem didn't
help. Allowing the cleaner kthread to use the global block reserve to
delete the unused data block groups fixed the problem.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
I want to set some per transaction flags, so instead of adding yet another int
lets just convert the current two int indicators to flags and add a flags field
for future use. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
We have a mechanism to make sure we don't lose updates for ordered extents that
were logged in the transaction that is currently running. We add the ordered
extent to a transaction list and then the transaction waits on all the ordered
extents in that list. However are substantially large file systems this list
can be extremely large, and can give us soft lockups, since the ordered extents
don't remove themselves from the list when they do complete.
To fix this we simply add a counter to the transaction that is incremented any
time we have a logged extent that needs to be completed in the current
transaction. Then when the ordered extent finally completes it decrements the
per transaction counter and wakes up the transaction if we are the last ones.
This will eliminate the softlockup. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
As we have the new metadata reservation functions, use them to replace
the old btrfs_qgroup_reserve() call for metadata.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
The value of num_items that start_transaction() ultimately
always takes is a small one, so a 64 bit integer is overkill.
Also change num_items for btrfs_start_transaction() and
btrfs_start_transaction_lflush() as well.
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Moise <00moses.alexander00@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Use memset() to null out the btrfs_delayed_ref_root of
btrfs_transaction instead of setting all the members to 0 by hand.
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Moise <00moses.alexander00@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Just call kmem_cache_zalloc() instead of calling kmem_cache_alloc().
We're just initializing most fields to 0, false and NULL later on
_anyway_, so to make the code mode readable and potentially gain
a bit of performance (completely untested claim), we should fill our
btrfs_trans_handle with zeros on allocation then just initialize
those five remaining fields (not counting the list_heads) as normal.
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Moise <00moses.alexander00@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
waitqueue_active should be preceded by a barrier, in this function we
don't need to call it all the time.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Pull btrfs fixes from Chris Mason:
"These are small and assorted. Neil's is the oldest, I dropped the
ball thinking he was going to send it in"
* 'for-linus-4.3' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs:
Btrfs: support NFSv2 export
Btrfs: open_ctree: Fix possible memory leak
Btrfs: fix deadlock when finalizing block group creation
Btrfs: update fix for read corruption of compressed and shared extents
Btrfs: send, fix corner case for reference overwrite detection
Josef ran into a deadlock while a transaction handle was finalizing the
creation of its block groups, which produced the following trace:
[260445.593112] fio D ffff88022a9df468 0 8924 4518 0x00000084
[260445.593119] ffff88022a9df468 ffffffff81c134c0 ffff880429693c00 ffff88022a9df488
[260445.593126] ffff88022a9e0000 ffff8803490d7b00 ffff8803490d7b18 ffff88022a9df4b0
[260445.593132] ffff8803490d7af8 ffff88022a9df488 ffffffff8175a437 ffff8803490d7b00
[260445.593137] Call Trace:
[260445.593145] [<ffffffff8175a437>] schedule+0x37/0x80
[260445.593189] [<ffffffffa0850f37>] btrfs_tree_lock+0xa7/0x1f0 [btrfs]
[260445.593197] [<ffffffff810db7c0>] ? prepare_to_wait_event+0xf0/0xf0
[260445.593225] [<ffffffffa07eac44>] btrfs_lock_root_node+0x34/0x50 [btrfs]
[260445.593253] [<ffffffffa07eff6b>] btrfs_search_slot+0x88b/0xa00 [btrfs]
[260445.593295] [<ffffffffa08389df>] ? free_extent_buffer+0x4f/0x90 [btrfs]
[260445.593324] [<ffffffffa07f1a06>] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x66/0xc0 [btrfs]
[260445.593351] [<ffffffffa07ea94a>] ? btrfs_alloc_path+0x1a/0x20 [btrfs]
[260445.593394] [<ffffffffa08403b9>] btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc+0x1c9/0x570 [btrfs]
[260445.593427] [<ffffffffa08002ab>] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x11b/0x200 [btrfs]
[260445.593459] [<ffffffffa0800964>] do_chunk_alloc+0x2a4/0x2e0 [btrfs]
[260445.593491] [<ffffffffa0803815>] find_free_extent+0xa55/0xd90 [btrfs]
[260445.593524] [<ffffffffa0803c22>] btrfs_reserve_extent+0xd2/0x220 [btrfs]
[260445.593532] [<ffffffff8119fe5d>] ? account_page_dirtied+0xdd/0x170
[260445.593564] [<ffffffffa0803e78>] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x108/0x4a0 [btrfs]
[260445.593597] [<ffffffffa080c9de>] ? btree_set_page_dirty+0xe/0x10 [btrfs]
[260445.593626] [<ffffffffa07eb5cd>] __btrfs_cow_block+0x12d/0x5b0 [btrfs]
[260445.593654] [<ffffffffa07ebbff>] btrfs_cow_block+0x11f/0x1c0 [btrfs]
[260445.593682] [<ffffffffa07ef8c7>] btrfs_search_slot+0x1e7/0xa00 [btrfs]
[260445.593724] [<ffffffffa08389df>] ? free_extent_buffer+0x4f/0x90 [btrfs]
[260445.593752] [<ffffffffa07f1a06>] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x66/0xc0 [btrfs]
[260445.593830] [<ffffffffa07ea94a>] ? btrfs_alloc_path+0x1a/0x20 [btrfs]
[260445.593905] [<ffffffffa08403b9>] btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc+0x1c9/0x570 [btrfs]
[260445.593946] [<ffffffffa08002ab>] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x11b/0x200 [btrfs]
[260445.593990] [<ffffffffa0815798>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0xa8/0xb40 [btrfs]
[260445.594042] [<ffffffffa085abcd>] ? btrfs_log_dentry_safe+0x6d/0x80 [btrfs]
[260445.594089] [<ffffffffa082bc84>] btrfs_sync_file+0x294/0x350 [btrfs]
[260445.594115] [<ffffffff8123e29b>] vfs_fsync_range+0x3b/0xa0
[260445.594133] [<ffffffff81023891>] ? syscall_trace_enter_phase1+0x131/0x180
[260445.594149] [<ffffffff8123e35d>] do_fsync+0x3d/0x70
[260445.594169] [<ffffffff81023bb8>] ? syscall_trace_leave+0xb8/0x110
[260445.594187] [<ffffffff8123e600>] SyS_fsync+0x10/0x20
[260445.594204] [<ffffffff8175de6e>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x71
This happened because the same transaction handle created a large number
of block groups and while finalizing their creation (inserting new items
and updating existing items in the chunk and device trees) a new metadata
extent had to be allocated and no free space was found in the current
metadata block groups, which made find_free_extent() attempt to allocate
a new block group via do_chunk_alloc(). However at do_chunk_alloc() we
ended up allocating a new system chunk too and exceeded the threshold
of 2Mb of reserved chunk bytes, which makes do_chunk_alloc() enter the
final part of block group creation again (at
btrfs_create_pending_block_groups()) and attempt to lock again the root
of the chunk tree when it's already write locked by the same task.
Similarly we can deadlock on extent tree nodes/leafs if while we are
running delayed references we end up creating a new metadata block group
in order to allocate a new node/leaf for the extent tree (as part of
a CoW operation or growing the tree), as btrfs_create_pending_block_groups
inserts items into the extent tree as well. In this case we get the
following trace:
[14242.773581] fio D ffff880428ca3418 0 3615 3100 0x00000084
[14242.773588] ffff880428ca3418 ffff88042d66b000 ffff88042a03c800 ffff880428ca3438
[14242.773594] ffff880428ca4000 ffff8803e4b20190 ffff8803e4b201a8 ffff880428ca3460
[14242.773600] ffff8803e4b20188 ffff880428ca3438 ffffffff8175a437 ffff8803e4b20190
[14242.773606] Call Trace:
[14242.773613] [<ffffffff8175a437>] schedule+0x37/0x80
[14242.773656] [<ffffffffa057ff07>] btrfs_tree_lock+0xa7/0x1f0 [btrfs]
[14242.773664] [<ffffffff810db7c0>] ? prepare_to_wait_event+0xf0/0xf0
[14242.773692] [<ffffffffa0519c44>] btrfs_lock_root_node+0x34/0x50 [btrfs]
[14242.773720] [<ffffffffa051ef6b>] btrfs_search_slot+0x88b/0xa00 [btrfs]
[14242.773750] [<ffffffffa0520a06>] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x66/0xc0 [btrfs]
[14242.773758] [<ffffffff811ef4a2>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x1d2/0x200
[14242.773786] [<ffffffffa0520ad1>] btrfs_insert_item+0x71/0xf0 [btrfs]
[14242.773818] [<ffffffffa052f292>] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x102/0x200 [btrfs]
[14242.773850] [<ffffffffa052f96e>] do_chunk_alloc+0x2ae/0x2f0 [btrfs]
[14242.773934] [<ffffffffa0532825>] find_free_extent+0xa55/0xd90 [btrfs]
[14242.773998] [<ffffffffa0532c22>] btrfs_reserve_extent+0xc2/0x1d0 [btrfs]
[14242.774041] [<ffffffffa0532e38>] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x108/0x4a0 [btrfs]
[14242.774078] [<ffffffffa051a5cd>] __btrfs_cow_block+0x12d/0x5b0 [btrfs]
[14242.774118] [<ffffffffa051abff>] btrfs_cow_block+0x11f/0x1c0 [btrfs]
[14242.774155] [<ffffffffa051e8c7>] btrfs_search_slot+0x1e7/0xa00 [btrfs]
[14242.774194] [<ffffffffa0528021>] ? __btrfs_free_extent.isra.70+0x2e1/0xcb0 [btrfs]
[14242.774235] [<ffffffffa0520a06>] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x66/0xc0 [btrfs]
[14242.774274] [<ffffffffa051994a>] ? btrfs_alloc_path+0x1a/0x20 [btrfs]
[14242.774318] [<ffffffffa052c433>] __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0xbb3/0x1020 [btrfs]
[14242.774358] [<ffffffffa052f404>] btrfs_run_delayed_refs.part.78+0x74/0x280 [btrfs]
[14242.774391] [<ffffffffa052f627>] btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x17/0x20 [btrfs]
[14242.774432] [<ffffffffa05be236>] commit_cowonly_roots+0x8d/0x2bd [btrfs]
[14242.774474] [<ffffffffa059d07f>] ? __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x1cf/0x210 [btrfs]
[14242.774516] [<ffffffffa05adac3>] ? btrfs_qgroup_account_extents+0x83/0x130 [btrfs]
[14242.774558] [<ffffffffa0544c40>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x590/0xb40 [btrfs]
[14242.774599] [<ffffffffa0589b9d>] ? btrfs_log_dentry_safe+0x6d/0x80 [btrfs]
[14242.774642] [<ffffffffa055ac54>] btrfs_sync_file+0x294/0x350 [btrfs]
[14242.774650] [<ffffffff8123e29b>] vfs_fsync_range+0x3b/0xa0
[14242.774657] [<ffffffff81023891>] ? syscall_trace_enter_phase1+0x131/0x180
[14242.774663] [<ffffffff8123e35d>] do_fsync+0x3d/0x70
[14242.774669] [<ffffffff81023bb8>] ? syscall_trace_leave+0xb8/0x110
[14242.774675] [<ffffffff8123e600>] SyS_fsync+0x10/0x20
[14242.774681] [<ffffffff8175de6e>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x71
Fix this by never recursing into the finalization phase of block group
creation and making sure we never trigger the finalization of block group
creation while running delayed references.
Reported-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Fixes: 00d80e342c ("Btrfs: fix quick exhaustion of the system array in the superblock")
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
btrfs_error() and btrfs_std_error() does the same thing
and calls _btrfs_std_error(), so consolidate them together.
And the main motivation is that btrfs_error() is closely
named with btrfs_err(), one handles error action the other
is to log the error, so don't closely name them.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Suggested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Pull btrfs fixes from Chris Mason:
"This is an assorted set I've been queuing up:
Jeff Mahoney tracked down a tricky one where we ended up starting IO
on the wrong mapping for special files in btrfs_evict_inode. A few
people reported this one on the list.
Filipe found (and provided a test for) a difficult bug in reading
compressed extents, and Josef fixed up some quota record keeping with
snapshot deletion. Chandan killed off an accounting bug during DIO
that lead to WARN_ONs as we freed inodes"
* 'for-linus-4.3' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs:
Btrfs: keep dropped roots in cache until transaction commit
Btrfs: Direct I/O: Fix space accounting
btrfs: skip waiting on ordered range for special files
Btrfs: fix read corruption of compressed and shared extents
Btrfs: remove unnecessary locking of cleaner_mutex to avoid deadlock
Btrfs: don't initialize a space info as full to prevent ENOSPC
When dropping a snapshot we need to account for the qgroup changes. If we drop
the snapshot in all one go then the backref code will fail to find blocks from
the snapshot we dropped since it won't be able to find the root in the fs root
cache. This can lead to us failing to find refs from other roots that pointed
at blocks in the now deleted root. To handle this we need to not remove the fs
roots from the cache until after we process the qgroup operations. Do this by
adding dropped roots to a list on the transaction, and letting the transaction
remove the roots at the same time it drops the commit roots. This will keep all
of the backref searching code in sync properly, and fixes a problem Mark was
seeing with snapshot delete and qgroups. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Tested-by: Holger Hoffstätte <holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Pull vfs updates from Al Viro:
"In this one:
- d_move fixes (Eric Biederman)
- UFS fixes (me; locking is mostly sane now, a bunch of bugs in error
handling ought to be fixed)
- switch of sb_writers to percpu rwsem (Oleg Nesterov)
- superblock scalability (Josef Bacik and Dave Chinner)
- swapon(2) race fix (Hugh Dickins)"
* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs: (65 commits)
vfs: Test for and handle paths that are unreachable from their mnt_root
dcache: Reduce the scope of i_lock in d_splice_alias
dcache: Handle escaped paths in prepend_path
mm: fix potential data race in SyS_swapon
inode: don't softlockup when evicting inodes
inode: rename i_wb_list to i_io_list
sync: serialise per-superblock sync operations
inode: convert inode_sb_list_lock to per-sb
inode: add hlist_fake to avoid the inode hash lock in evict
writeback: plug writeback at a high level
change sb_writers to use percpu_rw_semaphore
shift percpu_counter_destroy() into destroy_super_work()
percpu-rwsem: kill CONFIG_PERCPU_RWSEM
percpu-rwsem: introduce percpu_rwsem_release() and percpu_rwsem_acquire()
percpu-rwsem: introduce percpu_down_read_trylock()
document rwsem_release() in sb_wait_write()
fix the broken lockdep logic in __sb_start_write()
introduce __sb_writers_{acquired,release}() helpers
ufs_inode_get{frag,block}(): get rid of 'phys' argument
ufs_getfrag_block(): tidy up a bit
...
While we are committing a transaction, it's possible the previous one is
still finishing its commit and therefore we wait for it to finish first.
However we were not checking if that previous transaction ended up getting
aborted after we waited for it to commit, so we ended up committing the
current transaction which can lead to fs corruption because the new
superblock can point to trees that have had one or more nodes/leafs that
were never durably persisted.
The following sequence diagram exemplifies how this is possible:
CPU 0 CPU 1
transaction N starts
(...)
btrfs_commit_transaction(N)
cur_trans->state = TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_START;
(...)
cur_trans->state = TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_DOING;
(...)
cur_trans->state = TRANS_STATE_UNBLOCKED;
root->fs_info->running_transaction = NULL;
btrfs_start_transaction()
--> starts transaction N + 1
btrfs_write_and_wait_transaction(trans, root);
--> starts writing all new or COWed ebs created
at transaction N
creates some new ebs, COWs some
existing ebs but doesn't COW or
deletes eb X
btrfs_commit_transaction(N + 1)
(...)
cur_trans->state = TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_START;
(...)
wait_for_commit(root, prev_trans);
--> prev_trans == transaction N
btrfs_write_and_wait_transaction() continues
writing ebs
--> fails writing eb X, we abort transaction N
and set bit BTRFS_FS_STATE_ERROR on
fs_info->fs_state, so no new transactions
can start after setting that bit
cleanup_transaction()
btrfs_cleanup_one_transaction()
wakes up task at CPU 1
continues, doesn't abort because
cur_trans->aborted (transaction N + 1)
is zero, and no checks for bit
BTRFS_FS_STATE_ERROR in fs_info->fs_state
are made
btrfs_write_and_wait_transaction(trans, root);
--> succeeds, no errors during writeback
write_ctree_super(trans, root, 0);
--> succeeds
--> we have now a superblock that points us
to some root that uses eb X, which was
never written to disk
In this scenario future attempts to read eb X from disk results in an
error message like "parent transid verify failed on X wanted Y found Z".
So fix this by aborting the current transaction if after waiting for the
previous transaction we verify that it was aborted.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Preparation to hide the sb->s_writers internals from xfs and btrfs.
Add 2 trivial define's they can use rather than play with ->s_writers
directly. No changes in btrfs/transaction.o and xfs/xfs_aops.o.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
These arguments are not used in functions, remove them for cleanup
and make kernel stack happy.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
When we clear the dirty bits in btrfs_delete_unused_bgs for extents
in the empty block group, it results in btrfs_finish_extent_commit being
unable to discard the freed extents.
The block group removal patch added an alternate path to forget extents
other than btrfs_finish_extent_commit. As a result, any extents that
would be freed when the block group is removed aren't discarded. In my
test run, with a large copy of mixed sized files followed by removal, it
left nearly 2/3 of extents undiscarded.
To clean up the block groups, we add the removed block group onto a list
that will be discarded after transaction commit.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Tested-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> reported a lockdep warning of
delayed_iput_sem in xfstests generic/241:
[ 2061.345955] =============================================
[ 2061.346027] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
[ 2061.346027] 4.1.0+ #268 Tainted: G W
[ 2061.346027] ---------------------------------------------
[ 2061.346027] btrfs-cleaner/3045 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 2061.346027] (&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem){++++..}, at:
[<ffffffff814063ab>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x6b/0x100
[ 2061.346027] but task is already holding lock:
[ 2061.346027] (&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff814063ab>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x6b/0x100
[ 2061.346027] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 2061.346027] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 2061.346027] CPU0
[ 2061.346027] ----
[ 2061.346027] lock(&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem);
[ 2061.346027] lock(&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem);
[ 2061.346027]
*** DEADLOCK ***
It is rarely happened, about 1/400 in my test env.
The reason is recursion of btrfs_run_delayed_iputs():
cleaner_kthread
-> btrfs_run_delayed_iputs() *1
-> get delayed_iput_sem lock *2
-> iput()
-> ...
-> btrfs_commit_transaction()
-> btrfs_run_delayed_iputs() *1
-> get delayed_iput_sem lock (dead lock) *2
*1: recursion of btrfs_run_delayed_iputs()
*2: warning of lockdep about delayed_iput_sem
When fs is in high stress, new iputs may added into fs_info->delayed_iputs
list when btrfs_run_delayed_iputs() is running, which cause
second btrfs_run_delayed_iputs() run into down_read(&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem)
again, and cause above lockdep warning.
Actually, it will not cause real problem because both locks are read lock,
but to avoid lockdep warning, we can do a fix.
Fix:
Don't do btrfs_run_delayed_iputs() in btrfs_commit_transaction() for
cleaner_kthread thread to break above recursion path.
cleaner_kthread is calling btrfs_run_delayed_iputs() explicitly in code,
and don't need to call btrfs_run_delayed_iputs() again in
btrfs_commit_transaction(), it also give us a bonus to avoid stack overflow.
Test:
No above lockdep warning after patch in 1200 generic/241 tests.
Reported-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
When we call btrfs_commit_transaction(), we splice the list "ordered"
of our transaction handle into the transaction's "pending_ordered"
list, but we don't re-initialize the "ordered" list of our transaction
handle, this means it still points to the same elements it used to
before the splice. Then we check if the current transaction's state is
>= TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_START and if it is we end up calling
btrfs_end_transaction() which simply splices again the "ordered" list
of our handle into the transaction's "pending_ordered" list, leaving
multiple pointers to the same ordered extents which results in list
corruption when we are iterating, removing and freeing ordered extents
at btrfs_wait_pending_ordered(), resulting in access to dangling
pointers / use-after-free issues.
Similarly, btrfs_end_transaction() can end up in some cases calling
btrfs_commit_transaction(), and both did a list splice of the transaction
handle's "ordered" list into the transaction's "pending_ordered" without
re-initializing the handle's "ordered" list, resulting in exactly the
same problem.
This produces the following warning on a kernel with linked list
debugging enabled:
[109749.265416] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[109749.266410] WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 324 at lib/list_debug.c:59 __list_del_entry+0x5a/0x98()
[109749.267969] list_del corruption. prev->next should be ffff8800ba087e20, but was fffffff8c1f7c35d
(...)
[109749.287505] Call Trace:
[109749.288135] [<ffffffff8145f077>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x7b
[109749.298080] [<ffffffff81095de5>] ? console_unlock+0x356/0x3a2
[109749.331605] [<ffffffff8104b3b0>] warn_slowpath_common+0xa1/0xbb
[109749.334849] [<ffffffff81260642>] ? __list_del_entry+0x5a/0x98
[109749.337093] [<ffffffff8104b410>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x48
[109749.337847] [<ffffffff81260642>] __list_del_entry+0x5a/0x98
[109749.338678] [<ffffffffa053e8bf>] btrfs_wait_pending_ordered+0x46/0xdb [btrfs]
[109749.340145] [<ffffffffa058a65f>] ? __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x149/0x163 [btrfs]
[109749.348313] [<ffffffffa054077d>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x36b/0xa10 [btrfs]
[109749.349745] [<ffffffff81087310>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
[109749.350819] [<ffffffffa055370d>] btrfs_sync_file+0x36f/0x3fc [btrfs]
[109749.351976] [<ffffffff8118ec98>] vfs_fsync_range+0x8f/0x9e
[109749.360341] [<ffffffff8118ecc3>] vfs_fsync+0x1c/0x1e
[109749.368828] [<ffffffff8118ee1d>] do_fsync+0x34/0x4e
[109749.369790] [<ffffffff8118f045>] SyS_fsync+0x10/0x14
[109749.370925] [<ffffffff81465197>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x6f
[109749.382274] ---[ end trace 48e0d07f7c03d95a ]---
On a non-debug kernel this leads to invalid memory accesses, causing a
crash. Fix this by using list_splice_init() instead of list_splice() in
btrfs_commit_transaction() and btrfs_end_transaction().
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 50d9aa99bd ("Btrfs: make sure logged extents complete in the current transaction V3"
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
qgroup.
Make snapshot accounting work with new extent-oriented mechanism by
skipping given root in new/old_roots in create_pending_snapshot().
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
This is used by later qgroup fix patches for snapshot.
As current snapshot accounting is done by btrfs_qgroup_inherit(), but
new extent oriented quota mechanism will account extent from
btrfs_copy_root() and other snapshot things, causing wrong result.
So add this ability to handle snapshot accounting.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Switch from old ref_node based qgroup to extent based qgroup mechanism
for normal operations.
The new mechanism should hugely reduce the overhead of btrfs quota
system, and further more, the codes and logic should be more clean and
easier to maintain.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Add hook in add_delayed_ref_head() to record quota-related extent record
into delayed_ref_root->dirty_extent_record rb-tree for later qgroup
accounting.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
While creating a block group, we often end up getting ENOSPC while updating
the chunk tree, which leads to a transaction abortion that produces a trace
like the following:
[30670.116368] WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 20735 at fs/btrfs/super.c:260 __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x106 [btrfs]()
[30670.117777] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -28)
(...)
[30670.163567] Call Trace:
[30670.163906] [<ffffffff8142fa46>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x7b
[30670.164522] [<ffffffff8108b6a2>] ? console_unlock+0x361/0x3ad
[30670.165171] [<ffffffff81045ea5>] warn_slowpath_common+0xa1/0xbb
[30670.166323] [<ffffffffa035daa7>] ? __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x106 [btrfs]
[30670.167213] [<ffffffff81045f05>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x48
[30670.167862] [<ffffffffa035daa7>] __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x106 [btrfs]
[30670.169116] [<ffffffffa03743d7>] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x101/0x130 [btrfs]
[30670.170593] [<ffffffffa038426a>] __btrfs_end_transaction+0x84/0x366 [btrfs]
[30670.171960] [<ffffffffa038455c>] btrfs_end_transaction+0x10/0x12 [btrfs]
[30670.174649] [<ffffffffa036eb6b>] btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x11f/0x27c [btrfs]
[30670.176092] [<ffffffffa039450d>] btrfs_fallocate+0x7c8/0xb96 [btrfs]
[30670.177218] [<ffffffff812459f2>] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x15
[30670.178622] [<ffffffff81152447>] vfs_fallocate+0x14c/0x1de
[30670.179642] [<ffffffff8116b915>] ? __fget_light+0x2d/0x4f
[30670.180692] [<ffffffff81152863>] SyS_fallocate+0x47/0x62
[30670.186737] [<ffffffff81435b32>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x17
[30670.187792] ---[ end trace 0373e6b491c4a8cc ]---
This is because we don't do proper space reservation for the chunk block
reserve when we have multiple tasks allocating chunks in parallel.
So block group creation has 2 phases, and the first phase essentially
checks if there is enough space in the system space_info, allocating a
new system chunk if there isn't, while the second phase updates the
device, extent and chunk trees. However, because the updates to the
chunk tree happen in the second phase, if we have N tasks, each with
its own transaction handle, allocating new chunks in parallel and if
there is only enough space in the system space_info to allocate M chunks,
where M < N, none of the tasks ends up allocating a new system chunk in
the first phase and N - M tasks will get -ENOSPC when attempting to
update the chunk tree in phase 2 if they need to COW any nodes/leafs
from the chunk tree.
Fix this by doing proper reservation in the chunk block reserve.
The issue could be reproduced by running fstests generic/038 in a loop,
which eventually triggered the problem.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
We loop through all of the dirty block groups during commit and write
the free space cache. In order to make sure the cache is currect, we do
this while no other writers are allowed in the commit.
If a large number of block groups are dirty, this can introduce long
stalls during the final stages of the commit, which can block new procs
trying to change the filesystem.
This commit changes the block group cache writeout to take appropriate
locks and allow it to run earlier in the commit. We'll still have to
redo some of the block groups, but it means we can get most of the work
out of the way without blocking the entire FS.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
As we delete large extents, we end up doing huge amounts of COW in order
to delete the corresponding crcs. This adds accounting so that we keep
track of that space and flushing of delayed refs so that we don't build
up too much delayed crc work.
This helps limit the delayed work that must be done at commit time and
tries to avoid ENOSPC aborts because the crcs eat all the global
reserves.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
When we are deleting large files with large extents, we are building up
a huge set of delayed refs for processing. Truncate isn't checking
often enough to see if we need to back off and process those, or let
a commit proceed.
The end result is long stalls after the rm, and very long commit times.
During the commits, other processes back up waiting to start new
transactions and we get into trouble.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Pull btrfs fixes from Chris Mason:
"Most of these are fixing extent reservation accounting, or corners
with tree writeback during commit.
Josef's set does add a test, which isn't strictly a fix, but it'll
keep us from making this same mistake again"
* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs:
Btrfs: fix outstanding_extents accounting in DIO
Btrfs: add sanity test for outstanding_extents accounting
Btrfs: just free dummy extent buffers
Btrfs: account merges/splits properly
Btrfs: prepare block group cache before writing
Btrfs: fix ASSERT(list_empty(&cur_trans->dirty_bgs_list)
Btrfs: account for the correct number of extents for delalloc reservations
Btrfs: fix merge delalloc logic
Btrfs: fix comp_oper to get right order
Btrfs: catch transaction abortion after waiting for it
btrfs: fix sizeof format specifier in btrfs_check_super_valid()
Writing the block group cache will modify the extent tree quite a bit because it
truncates the old space cache and pre-allocates new stuff. To try and cut down
on the churn lets do the setup dance first, then later on hopefully we can avoid
looping with newly dirtied roots. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Dave could hit this assert consistently running btrfs/078. This is because
when we update the block groups we could truncate the free space, which would
try to delete the csums for that range and dirty the csum root. For this to
happen we have to have already written out the csum root so it's kind of hard to
hit this case. This patch fixes this by changing the logic to only write the
dirty block groups if the dirty_cowonly_roots list is empty. This will get us
the same effect as before since we add the extent root last, and will cover the
case that we dirty some other root again but not the extent root. Thanks,
Reported-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
This problem is uncovered by a test case: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/244297.
Fsync() can report success when it actually doesn't. When we
have several threads running fsync() at the same tiem and in one fsync() we
get a transaction abortion due to some problems(in the test case it's disk
failures), and other fsync()s may return successfully which makes userspace
programs think that data is now safely flushed into disk.
It's because that after fsyncs() fail btrfs_sync_log() due to disk failures,
they get to try btrfs_commit_transaction() where it finds that there is
already a transaction being committed, and they'll just call wait_for_commit()
and return. Note that we actually check "trans->aborted" in btrfs_end_transaction,
but it's likely that the error message is still not yet throwed out and only after
wait_for_commit() we're sure whether the transaction is committed successfully.
This add the necessary check and it now passes the test.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Pull btrfs fixes from Chris Mason:
"Outside of misc fixes, Filipe has a few fsync corners and we're
pulling in one more of Josef's fixes from production use here"
* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs:
Btrfs:__add_inode_ref: out of bounds memory read when looking for extended ref.
Btrfs: fix data loss in the fast fsync path
Btrfs: remove extra run_delayed_refs in update_cowonly_root
Btrfs: incremental send, don't rename a directory too soon
btrfs: fix lost return value due to variable shadowing
Btrfs: do not ignore errors from btrfs_lookup_xattr in do_setxattr
Btrfs: fix off-by-one logic error in btrfs_realloc_node
Btrfs: add missing inode update when punching hole
Btrfs: abort the transaction if we fail to update the free space cache inode
Btrfs: fix fsync race leading to ordered extent memory leaks
Clean the opencoded variant, cond_resched_lock also checks the lock for
contention so it might help in some cases that were not covered by
simple need_resched().
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Pull btrfs updates from Chris Mason:
"This pull is mostly cleanups and fixes:
- The raid5/6 cleanups from Zhao Lei fixup some long standing warts
in the code and add improvements on top of the scrubbing support
from 3.19.
- Josef has round one of our ENOSPC fixes coming from large btrfs
clusters here at FB.
- Dave Sterba continues a long series of cleanups (thanks Dave), and
Filipe continues hammering on corner cases in fsync and others
This all was held up a little trying to track down a use-after-free in
btrfs raid5/6. It's not clear yet if this is just made easier to
trigger with this pull or if its a new bug from the raid5/6 cleanups.
Dave Sterba is the only one to trigger it so far, but he has a
consistent way to reproduce, so we'll get it nailed shortly"
* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs: (68 commits)
Btrfs: don't remove extents and xattrs when logging new names
Btrfs: fix fsync data loss after adding hard link to inode
Btrfs: fix BUG_ON in btrfs_orphan_add() when delete unused block group
Btrfs: account for large extents with enospc
Btrfs: don't set and clear delalloc for O_DIRECT writes
Btrfs: only adjust outstanding_extents when we do a short write
btrfs: Fix out-of-space bug
Btrfs: scrub, fix sleep in atomic context
Btrfs: fix scheduler warning when syncing log
Btrfs: Remove unnecessary placeholder in btrfs_err_code
btrfs: cleanup init for list in free-space-cache
btrfs: delete chunk allocation attemp when setting block group ro
btrfs: clear bio reference after submit_one_bio()
Btrfs: fix scrub race leading to use-after-free
Btrfs: add missing cleanup on sysfs init failure
Btrfs: fix race between transaction commit and empty block group removal
btrfs: add more checks to btrfs_read_sys_array
btrfs: cleanup, rename a few variables in btrfs_read_sys_array
btrfs: add checks for sys_chunk_array sizes
btrfs: more superblock checks, lower bounds on devices and sectorsize/nodesize
...
There are some op tables that can be easily made const, similarly the
sysfs feature and raid tables. This is motivated by PaX CONSTIFY plugin.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Btrfs will report NO_SPACE when we create and remove files for several times,
and we can't write to filesystem until mount it again.
Steps to reproduce:
1: Create a single-dev btrfs fs with default option
2: Write a file into it to take up most fs space
3: Delete above file
4: Wait about 100s to let chunk removed
5: goto 2
Script is like following:
#!/bin/bash
# Recommend 1.2G space, too large disk will make test slow
DEV="/dev/sda16"
MNT="/mnt/tmp"
dev_size="$(lsblk -bn -o SIZE "$DEV")" || exit 2
file_size_m=$((dev_size * 75 / 100 / 1024 / 1024))
echo "Loop write ${file_size_m}M file on $((dev_size / 1024 / 1024))M dev"
for ((i = 0; i < 10; i++)); do umount "$MNT" 2>/dev/null; done
echo "mkfs $DEV"
mkfs.btrfs -f "$DEV" >/dev/null || exit 2
echo "mount $DEV $MNT"
mount "$DEV" "$MNT" || exit 2
for ((loop_i = 0; loop_i < 20; loop_i++)); do
echo
echo "loop $loop_i"
echo "dd file..."
cmd=(dd if=/dev/zero of="$MNT"/file0 bs=1M count="$file_size_m")
"${cmd[@]}" 2>/dev/null || {
# NO_SPACE error triggered
echo "dd failed: ${cmd[*]}"
exit 1
}
echo "rm file..."
rm -f "$MNT"/file0 || exit 2
for ((i = 0; i < 10; i++)); do
df "$MNT" | tail -1
sleep 10
done
done
Reason:
It is triggered by commit: 47ab2a6c68
which is used to remove empty block groups automatically, but the
reason is not in that patch. Code before works well because btrfs
don't need to create and delete chunks so many times with high
complexity.
Above bug is caused by many reason, any of them can trigger it.
Reason1:
When we remove some continuous chunks but leave other chunks after,
these disk space should be used by chunk-recreating, but in current
code, only first create will successed.
Fixed by Forrest Liu <forrestl@synology.com> in:
Btrfs: fix find_free_dev_extent() malfunction in case device tree has hole
Reason2:
contains_pending_extent() return wrong value in calculation.
Fixed by Forrest Liu <forrestl@synology.com> in:
Btrfs: fix find_free_dev_extent() malfunction in case device tree has hole
Reason3:
btrfs_check_data_free_space() try to commit transaction and retry
allocating chunk when the first allocating failed, but space_info->full
is set in first allocating, and prevent second allocating in retry.
Fixed in this patch by clear space_info->full in commit transaction.
Tested for severial times by above script.
Changelog v3->v4:
use light weight int instead of atomic_t to record have_remove_bgs in
transaction, suggested by:
Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Changelog v2->v3:
v2 fixed the bug by adding more commit-transaction, but we
only need to reclaim space when we are really have no space for
new chunk, noticed by:
Filipe David Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Actually, our code already have this type of commit-and-retry,
we only need to make it working with removed-bgs.
v3 fixed the bug with above way.
Changelog v1->v2:
v1 will introduce a new bug when delete and create chunk in same disk
space in same transaction, noticed by:
Filipe David Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
V2 fix this bug by commit transaction after remove block grops.
Reported-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Suggested-by: Filipe David Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Currently any time we try to update the block groups on disk we will walk _all_
block groups and check for the ->dirty flag to see if it is set. This function
can get called several times during a commit. So if you have several terabytes
of data you will be a very sad panda as we will loop through _all_ of the block
groups several times, which makes the commit take a while which slows down the
rest of the file system operations.
This patch introduces a dirty list for the block groups that we get added to
when we dirty the block group for the first time. Then we simply update any
block groups that have been dirtied since the last time we called
btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups. This allows us to clean up how we write the
free space cache out so it is much cleaner. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
I've been overloading root->dirty_list to keep track of dirty roots and which
roots need to have their commit roots switched at transaction commit time. This
could cause us to lose an update to the root which could corrupt the file
system. To fix this use a state bit to know if the root is dirty, and if it
isn't set we go ahead and move the root to the dirty list. This way if we
re-dirty the root after adding it to the switch_commit list we make sure to
update it. This also makes it so that the extent root is always the last root
on the dirty list to try and keep the amount of churn down at this point in the
commit. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Filipe Manana