When looking for viable candidates to shrink, we only want objects that
are not pinned. However to do so we performed a double iteration over
the vma in the objects, first looking for the pin-count, then looking
for allocations. We can do both at once and be slightly more explicit in
our validity test.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
And remove one bogus * from i915_gem_gtt.c since that's not a
kerneldoc there.
v2: Review from Chris:
- Clarify memory space to better distinguish from address space.
- Add note that shrink doesn't guarantee the freed memory and that
users must fall back to shrink_all.
- Explain how pinning ties in with eviction/shrinker.
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Two code changes:
- Extract i915_gem_shrinker_init.
- Inline i915_gem_object_is_purgeable since we open-code it everywhere
else too.
This already has the benefit of pulling all the shrinker code
together, next patch adds a bit of kerneldoc.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Chris Wilson