Commit graph

5 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Thomas Gleixner 25763b3c86 treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 206
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s):

  this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
  it under the terms of version 2 of the gnu general public license as
  published by the free software foundation

extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier

  GPL-2.0-only

has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 107 file(s).

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>
Reviewed-by: Richard Fontana <rfontana@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Steve Winslow <swinslow@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexios Zavras <alexios.zavras@intel.com>
Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190528171438.615055994@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-05-30 11:29:53 -07:00
Taeung Song 02a2f000a3 samples/bpf: Check the error of write() and read()
test_task_rename() and test_urandom_read()
can be failed during write() and read(),
So check the result of them.

Reviewed-by: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
Signed-off-by: Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@gmail.com>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-07-05 09:58:52 +02:00
Jakub Kicinski 2bf3e2ef42 samples: bpf: include bpf/bpf.h instead of local libbpf.h
There are two files in the tree called libbpf.h which is becoming
problematic.  Most samples don't actually need the local libbpf.h
they simply include it to get to bpf/bpf.h.  Include bpf/bpf.h
directly instead.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Acked-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-05-14 22:52:10 -07:00
Alexei Starovoitov 4662a4e538 samples/bpf: raw tracepoint test
add empty raw_tracepoint bpf program to test overhead similar
to kprobe and traditional tracepoint tests

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-03-28 22:55:19 +02:00
Alexei Starovoitov e3edfdec04 samples/bpf: add tracepoint vs kprobe performance tests
the first microbenchmark does
fd=open("/proc/self/comm");
for() {
  write(fd, "test");
}
and on 4 cpus in parallel:
                                      writes per sec
base (no tracepoints, no kprobes)         930k
with kprobe at __set_task_comm()          420k
with tracepoint at task:task_rename       730k

For kprobe + full bpf program manully fetches oldcomm, newcomm via bpf_probe_read.
For tracepint bpf program does nothing, since arguments are copied by tracepoint.

2nd microbenchmark does:
fd=open("/dev/urandom");
for() {
  read(fd, buf);
}
and on 4 cpus in parallel:
                                       reads per sec
base (no tracepoints, no kprobes)         300k
with kprobe at urandom_read()             279k
with tracepoint at random:urandom_read    290k

bpf progs attached to kprobe and tracepoint are noop.

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-04-07 21:04:27 -04:00