dev_pm_qos_read_value() will soon need to support more constraint types
(min/max frequency) and will have another argument to it, i.e. type of
the constraint. While that is fine for the existing users of
dev_pm_qos_read_value(), but not that optimal for the callers of
__dev_pm_qos_read_value() and dev_pm_qos_raw_read_value() as all the
callers of these two routines are only looking for resume latency
constraint.
Lets make these two routines care only about the resume latency
constraint and rename them to __dev_pm_qos_resume_latency() and
dev_pm_qos_raw_resume_latency().
Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
8262331eaa