![]() Change the semantics to retire any buffer older than the current seqno rather than repeatedly calling calling the function to retire the buffer at the head of the list matching the request seqno. Whilst this should have no semantic impact on the implementation, Daniel was wondering if there was a bug where we might miss a retirement and so end up with a continually growing active list. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
drm | ||
vga | ||
Makefile |