The seq_printf return value, because it's frequently misused,
will eventually be converted to void.
See: commit 1f33c41c03 ("seq_file: Rename seq_overflow() to
seq_has_overflowed() and make public")
Convert these "return seq_printf(...)" uses to:
seq_printf(seq, ...);
return 0;
Done via cocci script:
@@
struct seq_file *seq;
@@
- return
\(seq_printf\|seq_puts\|seq_putc\)(seq,
...);
+ return 0;
With some additional reformatting and typing post conversion.
Miscellanea:
o convert an rc++ use to a bool
o use seq_puts with fixed strings where appropriate
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
8faeebdf15