e1ebe86203
The enable/disable logic in toggle_bp_slot() is not symmetrical and imho very confusing. "old_count" in toggle_bp_task_slot() is actually new_count because this bp was already removed from the list. Change toggle_bp_slot() to always call list_add/list_del after toggle_bp_task_slot(). This way old_idx is task_bp_pinned() and this entry should be decremented, new_idx is +/-weight and we need to increment this element. The code/logic looks obvious. Reported-by: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130620155011.GA6330@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| Makefile | ||
| callchain.c | ||
| core.c | ||
| hw_breakpoint.c | ||
| internal.h | ||
| ring_buffer.c | ||
| uprobes.c | ||