![]() ...and provide an explicit name for the constraint. Naming the input constraint makes the code self-documenting and also avoids the fragility of numerically referring to constraints, e.g. %4 breaks badly whenever the constraints are modified. Explicitly using RDX was inherited from vCPU-run, i.e. completely arbitrary. Even vCPU-run doesn't truly need to explicitly use RDX, but doing so is more robust as vCPU-run needs tight control over its register usage. Note that while the naming "conflict" between host_rsp and HOST_RSP is slightly confusing, the former will be renamed slightly in a future patch, at which point HOST_RSP is absolutely what is desired. Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
capabilities.h | ||
evmcs.c | ||
evmcs.h | ||
nested.c | ||
nested.h | ||
ops.h | ||
pmu_intel.c | ||
vmcs.h | ||
vmcs12.c | ||
vmcs12.h | ||
vmcs_shadow_fields.h | ||
vmenter.S | ||
vmx.c | ||
vmx.h |