1
0
Fork 0
remarkable-linux/Documentation/acpi/acpi-lid.txt

97 lines
4.9 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Permalink Normal View History

Special Usage Model of the ACPI Control Method Lid Device
Copyright (C) 2016, Intel Corporation
Author: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Abstract:
Platforms containing lids convey lid state (open/close) to OSPMs using a
control method lid device. To implement this, the AML tables issue
Notify(lid_device, 0x80) to notify the OSPMs whenever the lid state has
changed. The _LID control method for the lid device must be implemented to
report the "current" state of the lid as either "opened" or "closed".
For most platforms, both the _LID method and the lid notifications are
reliable. However, there are exceptions. In order to work with these
exceptional buggy platforms, special restrictions and expections should be
taken into account. This document describes the restrictions and the
expections of the Linux ACPI lid device driver.
1. Restrictions of the returning value of the _LID control method
The _LID control method is described to return the "current" lid state.
However the word of "current" has ambiguity, some buggy AML tables return
the lid state upon the last lid notification instead of returning the lid
state upon the last _LID evaluation. There won't be difference when the
_LID control method is evaluated during the runtime, the problem is its
initial returning value. When the AML tables implement this control method
with cached value, the initial returning value is likely not reliable.
There are platforms always retun "closed" as initial lid state.
2. Restrictions of the lid state change notifications
There are buggy AML tables never notifying when the lid device state is
changed to "opened". Thus the "opened" notification is not guaranteed. But
it is guaranteed that the AML tables always notify "closed" when the lid
state is changed to "closed". The "closed" notification is normally used to
trigger some system power saving operations on Windows. Since it is fully
tested, it is reliable from all AML tables.
3. Expections for the userspace users of the ACPI lid device driver
The ACPI button driver exports the lid state to the userspace via the
following file:
/proc/acpi/button/lid/LID0/state
This file actually calls the _LID control method described above. And given
the previous explanation, it is not reliable enough on some platforms. So
it is advised for the userspace program to not to solely rely on this file
to determine the actual lid state.
The ACPI button driver emits the following input event to the userspace:
SW_LID
The ACPI lid device driver is implemented to try to deliver the platform
triggered events to the userspace. However, given the fact that the buggy
firmware cannot make sure "opened"/"closed" events are paired, the ACPI
button driver uses the following 3 modes in order not to trigger issues.
If the userspace hasn't been prepared to ignore the unreliable "opened"
events and the unreliable initial state notification, Linux users can use
the following kernel parameters to handle the possible issues:
Revert "ACPI / button: Remove lid_init_state=method mode" This reverts commit ecb10b694b72ca5ea51b3c90a71ff2a11963425a. The only expected ACPI control method lid device's usage model is 1. Listen to the lid notification, 2. Evaluate _LID after being notified by BIOS, 3. Suspend the system (if users configure to do so) after seeing "close". It's not ensured that BIOS will notify OS after boot/resume, and it's not ensured that BIOS will always generate "open" event upon opening the lid. But there are 2 wrong usage models: 1. When the lid device is responsible for suspend/resume the system, userspace requires to see "open" event to be paired with "close" after the system is resumed, or it will suspend the system again. 2. When an external monitor connects to the laptop attached docks, userspace requires to see "close" event after the system is resumed so that it can determine whether the internal display should remain dark and the external display should be lit on. After we made default kernel behavior to be suitable for usage model 1, users of usage model 2 start to report regressions for such behavior change. Reversion of button.lid_init_state=method doesn't actually reverts to old default behavior as doing so can enter a regression loop, but facilitates users to work the reported regressions around with button.lid_init_state=method. Fixes: ecb10b694b72 (ACPI / button: Remove lid_init_state=method mode) Cc: 4.11+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.11+ Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=195455 Link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1430259 Tested-by: Steffen Weber <steffen.weber@gmail.com> Tested-by: Julian Wiedmann <julian.wiedmann@jwi.name> Reported-by: Joachim Frieben <jfrieben@hotmail.com> Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-05-09 01:02:22 -06:00
A. button.lid_init_state=method:
When this option is specified, the ACPI button driver reports the
initial lid state using the returning value of the _LID control method
and whether the "opened"/"closed" events are paired fully relies on the
firmware implementation.
This option can be used to fix some platforms where the returning value
of the _LID control method is reliable but the initial lid state
notification is missing.
This option is the default behavior during the period the userspace
isn't ready to handle the buggy AML tables.
B. button.lid_init_state=open:
When this option is specified, the ACPI button driver always reports the
initial lid state as "opened" and whether the "opened"/"closed" events
are paired fully relies on the firmware implementation.
This may fix some platforms where the returning value of the _LID
control method is not reliable and the initial lid state notification is
missing.
If the userspace has been prepared to ignore the unreliable "opened" events
and the unreliable initial state notification, Linux users should always
use the following kernel parameter:
Revert "ACPI / button: Remove lid_init_state=method mode" This reverts commit ecb10b694b72ca5ea51b3c90a71ff2a11963425a. The only expected ACPI control method lid device's usage model is 1. Listen to the lid notification, 2. Evaluate _LID after being notified by BIOS, 3. Suspend the system (if users configure to do so) after seeing "close". It's not ensured that BIOS will notify OS after boot/resume, and it's not ensured that BIOS will always generate "open" event upon opening the lid. But there are 2 wrong usage models: 1. When the lid device is responsible for suspend/resume the system, userspace requires to see "open" event to be paired with "close" after the system is resumed, or it will suspend the system again. 2. When an external monitor connects to the laptop attached docks, userspace requires to see "close" event after the system is resumed so that it can determine whether the internal display should remain dark and the external display should be lit on. After we made default kernel behavior to be suitable for usage model 1, users of usage model 2 start to report regressions for such behavior change. Reversion of button.lid_init_state=method doesn't actually reverts to old default behavior as doing so can enter a regression loop, but facilitates users to work the reported regressions around with button.lid_init_state=method. Fixes: ecb10b694b72 (ACPI / button: Remove lid_init_state=method mode) Cc: 4.11+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.11+ Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=195455 Link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1430259 Tested-by: Steffen Weber <steffen.weber@gmail.com> Tested-by: Julian Wiedmann <julian.wiedmann@jwi.name> Reported-by: Joachim Frieben <jfrieben@hotmail.com> Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-05-09 01:02:22 -06:00
C. button.lid_init_state=ignore:
When this option is specified, the ACPI button driver never reports the
initial lid state and there is a compensation mechanism implemented to
ensure that the reliable "closed" notifications can always be delievered
to the userspace by always pairing "closed" input events with complement
"opened" input events. But there is still no guarantee that the "opened"
notifications can be delivered to the userspace when the lid is actually
opens given that some AML tables do not send "opened" notifications
reliably.
In this mode, if everything is correctly implemented by the platform
firmware, the old userspace programs should still work. Otherwise, the
new userspace programs are required to work with the ACPI button driver.
This option will be the default behavior after the userspace is ready to
handle the buggy AML tables.