1
0
Fork 0
remarkable-linux/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c

164 lines
4.1 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license. By default all files without license information are under the default license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2. Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0' SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text. This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and Philippe Ombredanne. How this work was done: Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of the use cases: - file had no licensing information it it. - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it, - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information, Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords. The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files. The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s) to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was: - Files considered eligible had to be source code files. - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5 lines of source - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5 lines). All documentation files were explicitly excluded. The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license identifiers to apply. - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was considered to have no license information in it, and the top level COPYING file license applied. For non */uapi/* files that summary was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 11139 and resulted in the first patch in this series. If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930 and resulted in the second patch in this series. - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in it (per prior point). Results summary: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------ GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270 GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17 LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15 GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14 ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5 LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4 LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1 and that resulted in the third patch in this series. - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became the concluded license(s). - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a license but the other didn't, or they both detected different licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred. - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics). - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier, the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later in time. In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so they are related. Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks in about 15000 files. In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the correct identifier. Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch version early this week with: - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected license ids and scores - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+ files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the different types of files to be modified. These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to generate the patches. Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2017-11-01 08:07:57 -06:00
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
#include <linux/smp.h>
#include <linux/timex.h>
#include <linux/string.h>
#include <linux/seq_file.h>
#include <linux/cpufreq.h>
/*
* Get CPU information for use by the procfs.
*/
static void show_cpuinfo_core(struct seq_file *m, struct cpuinfo_x86 *c,
unsigned int cpu)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
x86/cpu: Always print SMP information in /proc/cpuinfo Currently show_cpuinfo_core() displays cpu core information only if the number of threads per a whole cores is 2 or larger. However, this condition doesn't care about the number of sockets. For example, this condition doesn't hold on systems with two logical cpus consisting of two sockets and a single core on each socket - yet the topology information would be interesting to see in that case as well. I don't know whether or not there are processors in real world by which such configurations are possible, but at least on vitual machine environments, such configuration can occur, typically when no explicit SMP information is provided in advance. For example, on qemu/KVM, SMP information is specified via -smp command-line option, more specifically, its syntax is: -smp n[,cores=cores][,threads=threads][,sockets=sockets][,maxcpus=maxcpus] If this is not specified, qemu tells configuration with n-sockets, 1-core and 1-thread to the guest machine, on which guest, MP information is not displayed in /proc/cpuinfo. I saw this situation on VMWare guest environment, too. To fix this issue, this patch simply removes the condition because this information is useful even if there's only 1 thread. Signed-off-by: HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5277D644.4090707@jp.fujitsu.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2013-11-04 10:15:48 -07:00
seq_printf(m, "physical id\t: %d\n", c->phys_proc_id);
seq_printf(m, "siblings\t: %d\n",
cpumask_weight(topology_core_cpumask(cpu)));
x86/cpu: Always print SMP information in /proc/cpuinfo Currently show_cpuinfo_core() displays cpu core information only if the number of threads per a whole cores is 2 or larger. However, this condition doesn't care about the number of sockets. For example, this condition doesn't hold on systems with two logical cpus consisting of two sockets and a single core on each socket - yet the topology information would be interesting to see in that case as well. I don't know whether or not there are processors in real world by which such configurations are possible, but at least on vitual machine environments, such configuration can occur, typically when no explicit SMP information is provided in advance. For example, on qemu/KVM, SMP information is specified via -smp command-line option, more specifically, its syntax is: -smp n[,cores=cores][,threads=threads][,sockets=sockets][,maxcpus=maxcpus] If this is not specified, qemu tells configuration with n-sockets, 1-core and 1-thread to the guest machine, on which guest, MP information is not displayed in /proc/cpuinfo. I saw this situation on VMWare guest environment, too. To fix this issue, this patch simply removes the condition because this information is useful even if there's only 1 thread. Signed-off-by: HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5277D644.4090707@jp.fujitsu.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2013-11-04 10:15:48 -07:00
seq_printf(m, "core id\t\t: %d\n", c->cpu_core_id);
seq_printf(m, "cpu cores\t: %d\n", c->booted_cores);
seq_printf(m, "apicid\t\t: %d\n", c->apicid);
seq_printf(m, "initial apicid\t: %d\n", c->initial_apicid);
#endif
}
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
static void show_cpuinfo_misc(struct seq_file *m, struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
{
seq_printf(m,
"fdiv_bug\t: %s\n"
"f00f_bug\t: %s\n"
"coma_bug\t: %s\n"
"fpu\t\t: %s\n"
"fpu_exception\t: %s\n"
"cpuid level\t: %d\n"
x86/cpu: Drop wp_works_ok member of struct cpuinfo_x86 Remove the wp_works_ok member of struct cpuinfo_x86. It's an optimization back from Linux v0.99 times where we had no fixup support yet and did the CR0.WP test via special code in the page fault handler. The < 0 test was an optimization to not do the special casing for each NULL ptr access violation but just for the first one doing the WP test. Today it serves no real purpose as the test no longer needs special code in the page fault handler and the only call side -- mem_init() -- calls it just once, anyway. However, Xen pre-initializes it to 1, to skip the test. Doing the test again for Xen should be no issue at all, as even the commit introducing skipping the test (commit d560bc61575e ("x86, xen: Suppress WP test on Xen")) mentioned it being ban aid only. And, in fact, testing the patch on Xen showed nothing breaks. The pre-fixup times are long gone and with the removal of the fallback handling code in commit a5c2a893dbd4 ("x86, 386 removal: Remove CONFIG_X86_WP_WORKS_OK") the kernel requires a working CR0.WP anyway. So just get rid of the "optimization" and do the test unconditionally. Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com> Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com> Cc: Arnd Hannemann <hannemann@nets.rwth-aachen.de> Cc: Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1486933932-585-3-git-send-email-minipli@googlemail.com Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2017-02-12 14:12:08 -07:00
"wp\t\t: yes\n",
static_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_FDIV) ? "yes" : "no",
static_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_F00F) ? "yes" : "no",
static_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_COMA) ? "yes" : "no",
static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_FPU) ? "yes" : "no",
static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_FPU) ? "yes" : "no",
x86/cpu: Drop wp_works_ok member of struct cpuinfo_x86 Remove the wp_works_ok member of struct cpuinfo_x86. It's an optimization back from Linux v0.99 times where we had no fixup support yet and did the CR0.WP test via special code in the page fault handler. The < 0 test was an optimization to not do the special casing for each NULL ptr access violation but just for the first one doing the WP test. Today it serves no real purpose as the test no longer needs special code in the page fault handler and the only call side -- mem_init() -- calls it just once, anyway. However, Xen pre-initializes it to 1, to skip the test. Doing the test again for Xen should be no issue at all, as even the commit introducing skipping the test (commit d560bc61575e ("x86, xen: Suppress WP test on Xen")) mentioned it being ban aid only. And, in fact, testing the patch on Xen showed nothing breaks. The pre-fixup times are long gone and with the removal of the fallback handling code in commit a5c2a893dbd4 ("x86, 386 removal: Remove CONFIG_X86_WP_WORKS_OK") the kernel requires a working CR0.WP anyway. So just get rid of the "optimization" and do the test unconditionally. Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com> Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com> Cc: Arnd Hannemann <hannemann@nets.rwth-aachen.de> Cc: Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1486933932-585-3-git-send-email-minipli@googlemail.com Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2017-02-12 14:12:08 -07:00
c->cpuid_level);
}
#else
static void show_cpuinfo_misc(struct seq_file *m, struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
{
seq_printf(m,
"fpu\t\t: yes\n"
"fpu_exception\t: yes\n"
"cpuid level\t: %d\n"
"wp\t\t: yes\n",
c->cpuid_level);
}
#endif
static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
{
struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = v;
unsigned int cpu;
int i;
cpu = c->cpu_index;
seq_printf(m, "processor\t: %u\n"
"vendor_id\t: %s\n"
"cpu family\t: %d\n"
"model\t\t: %u\n"
"model name\t: %s\n",
cpu,
c->x86_vendor_id[0] ? c->x86_vendor_id : "unknown",
c->x86,
c->x86_model,
c->x86_model_id[0] ? c->x86_model_id : "unknown");
if (c->x86_mask || c->cpuid_level >= 0)
seq_printf(m, "stepping\t: %d\n", c->x86_mask);
else
seq_puts(m, "stepping\t: unknown\n");
if (c->microcode)
seq_printf(m, "microcode\t: 0x%x\n", c->microcode);
if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_TSC)) {
unsigned int freq = cpufreq_quick_get(cpu);
if (!freq)
freq = cpu_khz;
seq_printf(m, "cpu MHz\t\t: %u.%03u\n",
freq / 1000, (freq % 1000));
}
/* Cache size */
if (c->x86_cache_size >= 0)
seq_printf(m, "cache size\t: %d KB\n", c->x86_cache_size);
show_cpuinfo_core(m, c, cpu);
show_cpuinfo_misc(m, c);
seq_puts(m, "flags\t\t:");
for (i = 0; i < 32*NCAPINTS; i++)
if (cpu_has(c, i) && x86_cap_flags[i] != NULL)
seq_printf(m, " %s", x86_cap_flags[i]);
seq_puts(m, "\nbugs\t\t:");
for (i = 0; i < 32*NBUGINTS; i++) {
unsigned int bug_bit = 32*NCAPINTS + i;
if (cpu_has_bug(c, bug_bit) && x86_bug_flags[i])
seq_printf(m, " %s", x86_bug_flags[i]);
}
seq_printf(m, "\nbogomips\t: %lu.%02lu\n",
c->loops_per_jiffy/(500000/HZ),
(c->loops_per_jiffy/(5000/HZ)) % 100);
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
if (c->x86_tlbsize > 0)
seq_printf(m, "TLB size\t: %d 4K pages\n", c->x86_tlbsize);
#endif
seq_printf(m, "clflush size\t: %u\n", c->x86_clflush_size);
seq_printf(m, "cache_alignment\t: %d\n", c->x86_cache_alignment);
seq_printf(m, "address sizes\t: %u bits physical, %u bits virtual\n",
c->x86_phys_bits, c->x86_virt_bits);
seq_puts(m, "power management:");
for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
if (c->x86_power & (1 << i)) {
if (i < ARRAY_SIZE(x86_power_flags) &&
x86_power_flags[i])
seq_printf(m, "%s%s",
x86_power_flags[i][0] ? " " : "",
x86_power_flags[i]);
else
seq_printf(m, " [%d]", i);
}
}
seq_puts(m, "\n\n");
return 0;
}
static void *c_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
{
*pos = cpumask_next(*pos - 1, cpu_online_mask);
if ((*pos) < nr_cpu_ids)
return &cpu_data(*pos);
return NULL;
}
static void *c_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos)
{
(*pos)++;
return c_start(m, pos);
}
static void c_stop(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
{
}
const struct seq_operations cpuinfo_op = {
.start = c_start,
.next = c_next,
.stop = c_stop,
.show = show_cpuinfo,
};