igb: update the approach taken to acquiring and releasing the phy lock

The current approach is just using a ?: type mechanism to set the phy
locking bit.  This if fine for now but limits us to only 2.  Switch to a
nested if statement for future compatiblity with more than 2 phys.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
Alexander Duyck 2009-10-05 06:32:07 +00:00 committed by David S. Miller
parent 70d92f86dc
commit 008c3422d4

View file

@ -240,9 +240,10 @@ static s32 igb_get_invariants_82575(struct e1000_hw *hw)
**/
static s32 igb_acquire_phy_82575(struct e1000_hw *hw)
{
u16 mask;
u16 mask = E1000_SWFW_PHY0_SM;
mask = hw->bus.func ? E1000_SWFW_PHY1_SM : E1000_SWFW_PHY0_SM;
if (hw->bus.func == E1000_FUNC_1)
mask = E1000_SWFW_PHY1_SM;
return igb_acquire_swfw_sync_82575(hw, mask);
}
@ -256,9 +257,11 @@ static s32 igb_acquire_phy_82575(struct e1000_hw *hw)
**/
static void igb_release_phy_82575(struct e1000_hw *hw)
{
u16 mask;
u16 mask = E1000_SWFW_PHY0_SM;
if (hw->bus.func == E1000_FUNC_1)
mask = E1000_SWFW_PHY1_SM;
mask = hw->bus.func ? E1000_SWFW_PHY1_SM : E1000_SWFW_PHY0_SM;
igb_release_swfw_sync_82575(hw, mask);
}