ixgbe: Fix get_supported_physical_layer() due to new 82599 PHY types
A purely cosmetic change. Report which physical layer is present, instead of PHY unknown. 82599 added new PHY types for the SFP+ devices, and this was missed getting updated. Signed-off-by: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c8ea5ea9da
commit
1339b9e975
|
@ -1130,6 +1130,7 @@ s32 ixgbe_identify_phy_82599(struct ixgbe_hw *hw)
|
|||
u32 ixgbe_get_supported_physical_layer_82599(struct ixgbe_hw *hw)
|
||||
{
|
||||
u32 physical_layer = IXGBE_PHYSICAL_LAYER_UNKNOWN;
|
||||
u8 comp_codes_10g = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
switch (hw->device_id) {
|
||||
case IXGBE_DEV_ID_82599:
|
||||
|
@ -1143,6 +1144,8 @@ u32 ixgbe_get_supported_physical_layer_82599(struct ixgbe_hw *hw)
|
|||
|
||||
switch (hw->phy.sfp_type) {
|
||||
case ixgbe_sfp_type_da_cu:
|
||||
case ixgbe_sfp_type_da_cu_core0:
|
||||
case ixgbe_sfp_type_da_cu_core1:
|
||||
physical_layer = IXGBE_PHYSICAL_LAYER_SFP_PLUS_CU;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case ixgbe_sfp_type_sr:
|
||||
|
@ -1151,6 +1154,19 @@ u32 ixgbe_get_supported_physical_layer_82599(struct ixgbe_hw *hw)
|
|||
case ixgbe_sfp_type_lr:
|
||||
physical_layer = IXGBE_PHYSICAL_LAYER_10GBASE_LR;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case ixgbe_sfp_type_srlr_core0:
|
||||
case ixgbe_sfp_type_srlr_core1:
|
||||
hw->phy.ops.read_i2c_eeprom(hw,
|
||||
IXGBE_SFF_10GBE_COMP_CODES,
|
||||
&comp_codes_10g);
|
||||
if (comp_codes_10g & IXGBE_SFF_10GBASESR_CAPABLE)
|
||||
physical_layer =
|
||||
IXGBE_PHYSICAL_LAYER_10GBASE_SR;
|
||||
else if (comp_codes_10g & IXGBE_SFF_10GBASELR_CAPABLE)
|
||||
physical_layer =
|
||||
IXGBE_PHYSICAL_LAYER_10GBASE_LR;
|
||||
else
|
||||
physical_layer = IXGBE_PHYSICAL_LAYER_UNKNOWN;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
physical_layer = IXGBE_PHYSICAL_LAYER_UNKNOWN;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue