redonkable
/
remarkable-linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Releases Activity

regulator: 88pm800: Fix checking whether num_regulator is valid 

The code to check whether num_regulator is valid is wrong because it should
iterate all array entries rather than break from the for loop if
pdata->regulators[i] is NULL.

Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
wifi-calibration
Axel Lin 2013-08-04 09:23:28 +08:00 committed by Mark Brown
parent 6625d9d297
commit 19c6b5440a
1 changed files with 6 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

9
drivers/regulator/88pm800.c
View File

@ -299,10 +299,13 @@ static int pm800_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return -ENODEV;
}
} else if (pdata->num_regulators) {
/* Check whether num_regulator is valid. */
unsigned int count = 0;
for (i = 0; pdata->regulators[i]; i++)
count++;
/* Check whether num_regulator is valid. */
for (i = 0; ARRAY_SIZE(pdata->regulators); i++) {
if (pdata->regulators[i])
count++;
}
if (count != pdata->num_regulators)
return -EINVAL;
} else {