From 19cd56c48da58bebc3a638e036bcab69469acd27 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@gnu.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:34:12 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] procfs: fix /proc/softirqs formatting

The length of the BLOCK_IPOLL string is making i's value be printed too
far to the right.  This patch fixes this and makes the output a bit
neater.

Currently:
                CPU0
      HI:          0
   TIMER:     599792
  NET_TX:          2
  NET_RX:          6
   BLOCK:      80807
BLOCK_IOPOLL:          0
 TASKLET:      20012
   SCHED:          0
 HRTIMER:         63
     RCU:     619279

With patch:
                    CPU0
          HI:          0
       TIMER:     585582
      NET_TX:          2
      NET_RX:          6
       BLOCK:      80320
BLOCK_IOPOLL:          0
     TASKLET:      19287
       SCHED:          0
     HRTIMER:         62
         RCU:     604441

Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@gnu.org>
Acked-by: Keika Kobayashi <kobayashi.kk@ncos.nec.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---
 fs/proc/softirqs.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/proc/softirqs.c b/fs/proc/softirqs.c
index 1807c2419f17..37994737c983 100644
--- a/fs/proc/softirqs.c
+++ b/fs/proc/softirqs.c
@@ -10,13 +10,13 @@ static int show_softirqs(struct seq_file *p, void *v)
 {
 	int i, j;
 
-	seq_printf(p, "                ");
+	seq_printf(p, "                    ");
 	for_each_possible_cpu(i)
 		seq_printf(p, "CPU%-8d", i);
 	seq_printf(p, "\n");
 
 	for (i = 0; i < NR_SOFTIRQS; i++) {
-		seq_printf(p, "%8s:", softirq_to_name[i]);
+		seq_printf(p, "%12s:", softirq_to_name[i]);
 		for_each_possible_cpu(j)
 			seq_printf(p, " %10u", kstat_softirqs_cpu(i, j));
 		seq_printf(p, "\n");