redonkable/remarkable-linux
redonkable/remarkable-linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Releases Activity

trace_workqueue: use list_for_each_entry() instead of list_for_each_entry_safe()

Browse source 
No need to use list_for_each_entry_safe() in iteration without deleting
any node, we can use list_for_each_entry() instead.

[ Impact: cleanup ]

Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@gmail.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Zhaolei 2009-04-20 14:58:26 +08:00 committed by Frederic Weisbecker
parent fb39125fd7
commit 1fdfca9c57
1 changed files with 4 additions and 6 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

10
kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c
View file

@ -47,12 +47,11 @@ probe_workqueue_insertion(struct task_struct *wq_thread,
struct work_struct *work)
{
int cpu = cpumask_first(&wq_thread->cpus_allowed);
struct cpu_workqueue_stats *node, *next;
struct cpu_workqueue_stats *node;
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->lock, flags);
list_for_each_entry_safe(node, next, &workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->list,
list) {
list_for_each_entry(node, &workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->list, list) {
if (node->pid == wq_thread->pid) {
atomic_inc(&node->inserted);
goto found;
@ -69,12 +68,11 @@ probe_workqueue_execution(struct task_struct *wq_thread,
struct work_struct *work)
{
int cpu = cpumask_first(&wq_thread->cpus_allowed);
struct cpu_workqueue_stats *node, *next;
struct cpu_workqueue_stats *node;
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->lock, flags);
list_for_each_entry_safe(node, next, &workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->list,
list) {
list_for_each_entry(node, &workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->list, list) {
if (node->pid == wq_thread->pid) {
node->executed++;
goto found;