redonkable/remarkable-linux
redonkable/remarkable-linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Releases Activity

cfg80211: Fix signal_type comparison

Browse source 
signal_type is enum cfg80211_signal_type.

This fixes the gcc warning:

scan.c: In function `cfg80211_inform_bss':
scan.c:518:6: warning: comparison between `enum cfg80211_signal_type' and `enum nl80211_bss'
scan.c: In function `cfg80211_inform_bss_frame':
scan.c:574:6: warning: comparison between `enum cfg80211_signal_type' and `enum nl80211_bss'

Signed-off-by: Sujith <Sujith.Manoharan@atheros.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
This commit is contained in:
Sujith 2010-05-13 10:34:08 +05:30 committed by John W. Linville
parent 76cc8b13a6
commit 22fe88d3d8
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
net/wireless/scan.c
View file

@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ cfg80211_inform_bss(struct wiphy *wiphy,
privsz = wiphy->bss_priv_size;
if (WARN_ON(wiphy->signal_type == NL80211_BSS_SIGNAL_UNSPEC &&
if (WARN_ON(wiphy->signal_type == CFG80211_SIGNAL_TYPE_UNSPEC &&
(signal < 0 || signal > 100)))
return NULL;
@ -571,7 +571,7 @@ cfg80211_inform_bss_frame(struct wiphy *wiphy,
u.probe_resp.variable);
size_t privsz = wiphy->bss_priv_size;
if (WARN_ON(wiphy->signal_type == NL80211_BSS_SIGNAL_UNSPEC &&
if (WARN_ON(wiphy->signal_type == CFG80211_SIGNAL_TYPE_UNSPEC &&
(signal < 0 || signal > 100)))
return NULL;