redonkable/remarkable-linux
redonkable/remarkable-linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Releases Activity

Btrfs: Fix race against disk_i_size updates

Browse source 
The code to update the on disk i_size happens before the
ordered_extent record is removed.  So, it is possible for multiple
ordered_extent completion routines to run at the same time, and to
find each other in the ordered tree.

The end result is they both decide not to update disk_i_size, leaving
it too small.  This temporary fix just puts the updates inside
the extent_mutex.  A real solution would be stronger ordering of
disk_i_size updates against removing the ordered extent from the tree.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
This commit is contained in:
Chris Mason 2008-09-23 20:19:49 -04:00
parent 31840ae1a6
commit 3435302953
1 changed files with 2 additions and 0 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
fs/btrfs/inode.c
View file

@ -608,9 +608,11 @@ nocow:
add_pending_csums(trans, inode, ordered_extent->file_offset,
&ordered_extent->list);
mutex_lock(&BTRFS_I(inode)->extent_mutex);
btrfs_ordered_update_i_size(inode, ordered_extent);
btrfs_update_inode(trans, root, inode);
btrfs_remove_ordered_extent(inode, ordered_extent);
mutex_unlock(&BTRFS_I(inode)->extent_mutex);
/* once for us */
btrfs_put_ordered_extent(ordered_extent);