redonkable/remarkable-linux
redonkable/remarkable-linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Releases Activity

mlxsw: spectrum_router: Simplify LPM tree allocation

Browse source 
When looking for a new LPM tree we should always consider all the unused
trees. It doesn't matter if the new tree is required due to changes in
currently used prefixes inside an existing routing table or because a
route was inserted into an empty table.

Both cases are functionally identical and therefore should be treated
the same.

When looking for a new LPM tree, consider all unused trees and don't
reserve trees for specific cases.

Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
Ido Schimmel 2017-03-10 08:53:40 +01:00 committed by David S. Miller
parent 4724ba561a
commit 382dbb4014
1 changed files with 9 additions and 13 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

22
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c
View file

@ -196,19 +196,15 @@ static void mlxsw_sp_fib_destroy(struct mlxsw_sp_fib *fib)
}
static struct mlxsw_sp_lpm_tree *
mlxsw_sp_lpm_tree_find_unused(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp, bool one_reserved)
mlxsw_sp_lpm_tree_find_unused(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp)
{
static struct mlxsw_sp_lpm_tree *lpm_tree;
int i;
for (i = 0; i < MLXSW_SP_LPM_TREE_COUNT; i++) {
lpm_tree = &mlxsw_sp->router.lpm_trees[i];
if (lpm_tree->ref_count == 0) {
if (one_reserved)
one_reserved = false;
else
return lpm_tree;
}
if (lpm_tree->ref_count == 0)
return lpm_tree;
}
return NULL;
}
@ -262,12 +258,12 @@ mlxsw_sp_lpm_tree_left_struct_set(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp,
static struct mlxsw_sp_lpm_tree *
mlxsw_sp_lpm_tree_create(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp,
struct mlxsw_sp_prefix_usage *prefix_usage,
enum mlxsw_sp_l3proto proto, bool one_reserved)
enum mlxsw_sp_l3proto proto)
{
struct mlxsw_sp_lpm_tree *lpm_tree;
int err;
lpm_tree = mlxsw_sp_lpm_tree_find_unused(mlxsw_sp, one_reserved);
lpm_tree = mlxsw_sp_lpm_tree_find_unused(mlxsw_sp);
if (!lpm_tree)
return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
lpm_tree->proto = proto;
@ -297,7 +293,7 @@ static int mlxsw_sp_lpm_tree_destroy(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp,
static struct mlxsw_sp_lpm_tree *
mlxsw_sp_lpm_tree_get(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp,
struct mlxsw_sp_prefix_usage *prefix_usage,
enum mlxsw_sp_l3proto proto, bool one_reserved)
enum mlxsw_sp_l3proto proto)
{
struct mlxsw_sp_lpm_tree *lpm_tree;
int i;
@ -311,7 +307,7 @@ mlxsw_sp_lpm_tree_get(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp,
goto inc_ref_count;
}
lpm_tree = mlxsw_sp_lpm_tree_create(mlxsw_sp, prefix_usage,
proto, one_reserved);
proto);
if (IS_ERR(lpm_tree))
return lpm_tree;
@ -421,7 +417,7 @@ static struct mlxsw_sp_vr *mlxsw_sp_vr_create(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp,
mlxsw_sp_prefix_usage_zero(&req_prefix_usage);
mlxsw_sp_prefix_usage_set(&req_prefix_usage, prefix_len);
lpm_tree = mlxsw_sp_lpm_tree_get(mlxsw_sp, &req_prefix_usage,
proto, true);
proto);
if (IS_ERR(lpm_tree)) {
err = PTR_ERR(lpm_tree);
goto err_tree_get;
@ -463,7 +459,7 @@ mlxsw_sp_vr_lpm_tree_check(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp, struct mlxsw_sp_vr *vr,
return 0;
new_tree = mlxsw_sp_lpm_tree_get(mlxsw_sp, req_prefix_usage,
vr->proto, false);
vr->proto);
if (IS_ERR(new_tree)) {
/* We failed to get a tree according to the required
* prefix usage. However, the current tree might be still good