redonkable/remarkable-linux
redonkable/remarkable-linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Releases Activity

SUNRPC: Allow caller of rpc_sleep_on() to select priority levels

Browse source 
Currently, the caller has to change the value of task->tk_priority if
it wants to select on which priority level the task will sleep.

This patch allows the caller to select a priority level at sleep time
rather than always using task->tk_priority.

Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
This commit is contained in:
Trond Myklebust 2011-07-17 18:11:34 -04:00
parent d9ba131d8f
commit 3b27bad7f7
2 changed files with 33 additions and 9 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
include/linux/sunrpc/sched.h
View file

@ -227,6 +227,10 @@ void rpc_init_wait_queue(struct rpc_wait_queue *, const char *);
void rpc_destroy_wait_queue(struct rpc_wait_queue *);
void rpc_sleep_on(struct rpc_wait_queue *, struct rpc_task *,
rpc_action action);
void rpc_sleep_on_priority(struct rpc_wait_queue *,
struct rpc_task *,
rpc_action action,
int priority);
void rpc_wake_up_queued_task(struct rpc_wait_queue *,
struct rpc_task *);
void rpc_wake_up(struct rpc_wait_queue *);

38
net/sunrpc/sched.c
View file

@ -97,14 +97,16 @@ __rpc_add_timer(struct rpc_wait_queue *queue, struct rpc_task *task)
/*
* Add new request to a priority queue.
*/
static void __rpc_add_wait_queue_priority(struct rpc_wait_queue *queue, struct rpc_task *task)
static void __rpc_add_wait_queue_priority(struct rpc_wait_queue *queue,
struct rpc_task *task,
unsigned char queue_priority)
{
struct list_head *q;
struct rpc_task *t;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&task->u.tk_wait.links);
q = &queue->tasks[task->tk_priority];
if (unlikely(task->tk_priority > queue->maxpriority))
q = &queue->tasks[queue_priority];
if (unlikely(queue_priority > queue->maxpriority))
q = &queue->tasks[queue->maxpriority];
list_for_each_entry(t, q, u.tk_wait.list) {
if (t->tk_owner == task->tk_owner) {
@ -123,12 +125,14 @@ static void __rpc_add_wait_queue_priority(struct rpc_wait_queue *queue, struct r
* improve overall performance.
* Everyone else gets appended to the queue to ensure proper FIFO behavior.
*/
static void __rpc_add_wait_queue(struct rpc_wait_queue *queue, struct rpc_task *task)
static void __rpc_add_wait_queue(struct rpc_wait_queue *queue,
struct rpc_task *task,
unsigned char queue_priority)
{
BUG_ON (RPC_IS_QUEUED(task));
if (RPC_IS_PRIORITY(queue))
__rpc_add_wait_queue_priority(queue, task);
__rpc_add_wait_queue_priority(queue, task, queue_priority);
else if (RPC_IS_SWAPPER(task))
list_add(&task->u.tk_wait.list, &queue->tasks[0]);
else
@ -311,13 +315,15 @@ static void rpc_make_runnable(struct rpc_task *task)
* NB: An RPC task will only receive interrupt-driven events as long
* as it's on a wait queue.
*/
static void __rpc_sleep_on(struct rpc_wait_queue *q, struct rpc_task *task,
rpc_action action)
static void __rpc_sleep_on_priority(struct rpc_wait_queue *q,
struct rpc_task *task,
rpc_action action,
unsigned char queue_priority)
{
dprintk("RPC: %5u sleep_on(queue \"%s\" time %lu)\n",
task->tk_pid, rpc_qname(q), jiffies);
__rpc_add_wait_queue(q, task);
__rpc_add_wait_queue(q, task, queue_priority);
BUG_ON(task->tk_callback != NULL);
task->tk_callback = action;
@ -334,11 +340,25 @@ void rpc_sleep_on(struct rpc_wait_queue *q, struct rpc_task *task,
* Protect the queue operations.
*/
spin_lock_bh(&q->lock);
__rpc_sleep_on(q, task, action);
__rpc_sleep_on_priority(q, task, action, task->tk_priority);
spin_unlock_bh(&q->lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rpc_sleep_on);
void rpc_sleep_on_priority(struct rpc_wait_queue *q, struct rpc_task *task,
rpc_action action, int priority)
{
/* We shouldn't ever put an inactive task to sleep */
BUG_ON(!RPC_IS_ACTIVATED(task));
/*
* Protect the queue operations.
*/
spin_lock_bh(&q->lock);
__rpc_sleep_on_priority(q, task, action, priority - RPC_PRIORITY_LOW);
spin_unlock_bh(&q->lock);
}
/**
* __rpc_do_wake_up_task - wake up a single rpc_task
* @queue: wait queue