diff --git a/Documentation/00-INDEX b/Documentation/00-INDEX index 793acf999e9e..8c2a66e176b9 100644 --- a/Documentation/00-INDEX +++ b/Documentation/00-INDEX @@ -264,6 +264,8 @@ logo.gif - full colour GIF image of Linux logo (penguin - Tux). logo.txt - info on creator of above logo & site to get additional images from. +lsm.txt + - Linux Security Modules: General Security Hooks for Linux lzo.txt - kernel LZO decompressor input formats m68k/ diff --git a/Documentation/DocBook/Makefile b/Documentation/DocBook/Makefile index efba7f980895..8b137891791f 100644 --- a/Documentation/DocBook/Makefile +++ b/Documentation/DocBook/Makefile @@ -1,276 +1 @@ -### -# This makefile is used to generate the kernel documentation, -# primarily based on in-line comments in various source files. -# See Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt for instruction in how -# to document the SRC - and how to read it. -# To add a new book the only step required is to add the book to the -# list of DOCBOOKS. -DOCBOOKS := lsm.xml - -ifeq ($(DOCBOOKS),) - -# Skip DocBook build if the user explicitly requested no DOCBOOKS. -.DEFAULT: - @echo " SKIP DocBook $@ target (DOCBOOKS=\"\" specified)." -else -ifneq ($(SPHINXDIRS),) - -# Skip DocBook build if the user explicitly requested a sphinx dir -.DEFAULT: - @echo " SKIP DocBook $@ target (SPHINXDIRS specified)." -else - - -### -# The build process is as follows (targets): -# (xmldocs) [by docproc] -# file.tmpl --> file.xml +--> file.ps (psdocs) [by db2ps or xmlto] -# +--> file.pdf (pdfdocs) [by db2pdf or xmlto] -# +--> DIR=file (htmldocs) [by xmlto] -# +--> man/ (mandocs) [by xmlto] - - -# for PDF and PS output you can choose between xmlto and docbook-utils tools -PDF_METHOD = $(prefer-db2x) -PS_METHOD = $(prefer-db2x) - - -targets += $(DOCBOOKS) -BOOKS := $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(DOCBOOKS)) -xmldocs: $(BOOKS) -sgmldocs: xmldocs - -PS := $(patsubst %.xml, %.ps, $(BOOKS)) -psdocs: $(PS) - -PDF := $(patsubst %.xml, %.pdf, $(BOOKS)) -pdfdocs: $(PDF) - -HTML := $(sort $(patsubst %.xml, %.html, $(BOOKS))) -htmldocs: $(HTML) - $(call cmd,build_main_index) - -MAN := $(patsubst %.xml, %.9, $(BOOKS)) -mandocs: $(MAN) - find $(obj)/man -name '*.9' | xargs gzip -nf - -# Default location for installed man pages -export INSTALL_MAN_PATH = $(objtree)/usr - -installmandocs: mandocs - mkdir -p $(INSTALL_MAN_PATH)/man/man9/ - find $(obj)/man -name '*.9.gz' -printf '%h %f\n' | \ - sort -k 2 -k 1 | uniq -f 1 | sed -e 's: :/:' | \ - xargs install -m 644 -t $(INSTALL_MAN_PATH)/man/man9/ - -# no-op for the DocBook toolchain -epubdocs: -latexdocs: -linkcheckdocs: - -### -#External programs used -KERNELDOCXMLREF = $(srctree)/scripts/kernel-doc-xml-ref -KERNELDOC = $(srctree)/scripts/kernel-doc -DOCPROC = $(objtree)/scripts/docproc -CHECK_LC_CTYPE = $(objtree)/scripts/check-lc_ctype - -# Use a fixed encoding - UTF-8 if the C library has support built-in -# or ASCII if not -LC_CTYPE := $(call try-run, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 $(CHECK_LC_CTYPE),C.UTF-8,C) -export LC_CTYPE - -XMLTOFLAGS = -m $(srctree)/$(src)/stylesheet.xsl -XMLTOFLAGS += --skip-validation - -### -# DOCPROC is used for two purposes: -# 1) To generate a dependency list for a .tmpl file -# 2) To preprocess a .tmpl file and call kernel-doc with -# appropriate parameters. -# The following rules are used to generate the .xml documentation -# required to generate the final targets. (ps, pdf, html). -quiet_cmd_docproc = DOCPROC $@ - cmd_docproc = SRCTREE=$(srctree)/ $(DOCPROC) doc $< >$@ -define rule_docproc - set -e; \ - $(if $($(quiet)cmd_$(1)),echo ' $($(quiet)cmd_$(1))';) \ - $(cmd_$(1)); \ - ( \ - echo 'cmd_$@ := $(cmd_$(1))'; \ - echo $@: `SRCTREE=$(srctree) $(DOCPROC) depend $<`; \ - ) > $(dir $@).$(notdir $@).cmd -endef - -%.xml: %.tmpl $(KERNELDOC) $(DOCPROC) $(KERNELDOCXMLREF) FORCE - $(call if_changed_rule,docproc) - -# Tell kbuild to always build the programs -always := $(hostprogs-y) - -notfoundtemplate = echo "*** You have to install docbook-utils or xmlto ***"; \ - exit 1 -db2xtemplate = db2TYPE -o $(dir $@) $< -xmltotemplate = xmlto TYPE $(XMLTOFLAGS) -o $(dir $@) $< - -# determine which methods are available -ifeq ($(shell which db2ps >/dev/null 2>&1 && echo found),found) - use-db2x = db2x - prefer-db2x = db2x -else - use-db2x = notfound - prefer-db2x = $(use-xmlto) -endif -ifeq ($(shell which xmlto >/dev/null 2>&1 && echo found),found) - use-xmlto = xmlto - prefer-xmlto = xmlto -else - use-xmlto = notfound - prefer-xmlto = $(use-db2x) -endif - -# the commands, generated from the chosen template -quiet_cmd_db2ps = PS $@ - cmd_db2ps = $(subst TYPE,ps, $($(PS_METHOD)template)) -%.ps : %.xml - $(call cmd,db2ps) - -quiet_cmd_db2pdf = PDF $@ - cmd_db2pdf = $(subst TYPE,pdf, $($(PDF_METHOD)template)) -%.pdf : %.xml - $(call cmd,db2pdf) - - -index = index.html -main_idx = $(obj)/$(index) -quiet_cmd_build_main_index = HTML $(main_idx) - cmd_build_main_index = rm -rf $(main_idx); \ - echo '

Linux Kernel HTML Documentation

' >> $(main_idx) && \ - echo '

Kernel Version: $(KERNELVERSION)

' >> $(main_idx) && \ - cat $(HTML) >> $(main_idx) - -quiet_cmd_db2html = HTML $@ - cmd_db2html = xmlto html $(XMLTOFLAGS) -o $(patsubst %.html,%,$@) $< && \ - echo ' \ - $(patsubst %.html,%,$(notdir $@))

' > $@ - -### -# Rules to create an aux XML and .db, and use them to re-process the DocBook XML -# to fill internal hyperlinks - gen_aux_xml = : - quiet_gen_aux_xml = echo ' XMLREF $@' -silent_gen_aux_xml = : -%.aux.xml: %.xml - @$($(quiet)gen_aux_xml) - @rm -rf $@ - @(cat $< | egrep "^ $<.db) - @$(KERNELDOCXMLREF) -db $<.db $< > $@ -.PRECIOUS: %.aux.xml - -%.html: %.aux.xml - @(which xmlto > /dev/null 2>&1) || \ - (echo "*** You need to install xmlto ***"; \ - exit 1) - @rm -rf $@ $(patsubst %.html,%,$@) - $(call cmd,db2html) - @if [ ! -z "$(PNG-$(basename $(notdir $@)))" ]; then \ - cp $(PNG-$(basename $(notdir $@))) $(patsubst %.html,%,$@); fi - -quiet_cmd_db2man = MAN $@ - cmd_db2man = if grep -q refentry $<; then xmlto man $(XMLTOFLAGS) -o $(obj)/man/$(*F) $< ; fi -%.9 : %.xml - @(which xmlto > /dev/null 2>&1) || \ - (echo "*** You need to install xmlto ***"; \ - exit 1) - $(Q)mkdir -p $(obj)/man/$(*F) - $(call cmd,db2man) - @touch $@ - -### -# Rules to generate postscripts and PNG images from .fig format files -quiet_cmd_fig2eps = FIG2EPS $@ - cmd_fig2eps = fig2dev -Leps $< $@ - -%.eps: %.fig - @(which fig2dev > /dev/null 2>&1) || \ - (echo "*** You need to install transfig ***"; \ - exit 1) - $(call cmd,fig2eps) - -quiet_cmd_fig2png = FIG2PNG $@ - cmd_fig2png = fig2dev -Lpng $< $@ - -%.png: %.fig - @(which fig2dev > /dev/null 2>&1) || \ - (echo "*** You need to install transfig ***"; \ - exit 1) - $(call cmd,fig2png) - -### -# Rule to convert a .c file to inline XML documentation - gen_xml = : - quiet_gen_xml = echo ' GEN $@' -silent_gen_xml = : -%.xml: %.c - @$($(quiet)gen_xml) - @( \ - echo ""; \ - expand --tabs=8 < $< | \ - sed -e "s/&/\\&/g" \ - -e "s//\\>/g"; \ - echo "") > $@ - -endif # DOCBOOKS="" -endif # SPHINDIR=... - -### -# Help targets as used by the top-level makefile -dochelp: - @echo ' Linux kernel internal documentation in different formats (DocBook):' - @echo ' htmldocs - HTML' - @echo ' pdfdocs - PDF' - @echo ' psdocs - Postscript' - @echo ' xmldocs - XML DocBook' - @echo ' mandocs - man pages' - @echo ' installmandocs - install man pages generated by mandocs to INSTALL_MAN_PATH'; \ - echo ' (default: $(INSTALL_MAN_PATH))'; \ - echo '' - @echo ' cleandocs - clean all generated DocBook files' - @echo - @echo ' make DOCBOOKS="s1.xml s2.xml" [target] Generate only docs s1.xml s2.xml' - @echo ' valid values for DOCBOOKS are: $(DOCBOOKS)' - @echo - @echo " make DOCBOOKS=\"\" [target] Don't generate docs from Docbook" - @echo ' This is useful to generate only the ReST docs (Sphinx)' - - -### -# Temporary files left by various tools -clean-files := $(DOCBOOKS) \ - $(patsubst %.xml, %.dvi, $(DOCBOOKS)) \ - $(patsubst %.xml, %.aux, $(DOCBOOKS)) \ - $(patsubst %.xml, %.tex, $(DOCBOOKS)) \ - $(patsubst %.xml, %.log, $(DOCBOOKS)) \ - $(patsubst %.xml, %.out, $(DOCBOOKS)) \ - $(patsubst %.xml, %.ps, $(DOCBOOKS)) \ - $(patsubst %.xml, %.pdf, $(DOCBOOKS)) \ - $(patsubst %.xml, %.html, $(DOCBOOKS)) \ - $(patsubst %.xml, %.9, $(DOCBOOKS)) \ - $(patsubst %.xml, %.aux.xml, $(DOCBOOKS)) \ - $(patsubst %.xml, %.xml.db, $(DOCBOOKS)) \ - $(patsubst %.xml, %.xml, $(DOCBOOKS)) \ - $(patsubst %.xml, .%.xml.cmd, $(DOCBOOKS)) \ - $(index) - -clean-dirs := $(patsubst %.xml,%,$(DOCBOOKS)) man - -cleandocs: - $(Q)rm -f $(call objectify, $(clean-files)) - $(Q)rm -rf $(call objectify, $(clean-dirs)) - -# Declare the contents of the .PHONY variable as phony. We keep that -# information in a variable so we can use it in if_changed and friends. - -.PHONY: $(PHONY) diff --git a/Documentation/DocBook/lsm.tmpl b/Documentation/DocBook/lsm.tmpl deleted file mode 100644 index fe7664ce9667..000000000000 --- a/Documentation/DocBook/lsm.tmpl +++ /dev/null @@ -1,265 +0,0 @@ - - - -

- - Linux Security Modules: General Security Hooks for Linux - - - Stephen - Smalley - - NAI Labs -
ssmalley@nai.com
- - - - Timothy - Fraser - - NAI Labs -
tfraser@nai.com
- - - - Chris - Vance - - NAI Labs -
cvance@nai.com
- - - - - -Introduction - - -In March 2001, the National Security Agency (NSA) gave a presentation -about Security-Enhanced Linux (SELinux) at the 2.5 Linux Kernel -Summit. SELinux is an implementation of flexible and fine-grained -nondiscretionary access controls in the Linux kernel, originally -implemented as its own particular kernel patch. Several other -security projects (e.g. RSBAC, Medusa) have also developed flexible -access control architectures for the Linux kernel, and various -projects have developed particular access control models for Linux -(e.g. LIDS, DTE, SubDomain). Each project has developed and -maintained its own kernel patch to support its security needs. - - - -In response to the NSA presentation, Linus Torvalds made a set of -remarks that described a security framework he would be willing to -consider for inclusion in the mainstream Linux kernel. He described a -general framework that would provide a set of security hooks to -control operations on kernel objects and a set of opaque security -fields in kernel data structures for maintaining security attributes. -This framework could then be used by loadable kernel modules to -implement any desired model of security. Linus also suggested the -possibility of migrating the Linux capabilities code into such a -module. - - - -The Linux Security Modules (LSM) project was started by WireX to -develop such a framework. LSM is a joint development effort by -several security projects, including Immunix, SELinux, SGI and Janus, -and several individuals, including Greg Kroah-Hartman and James -Morris, to develop a Linux kernel patch that implements this -framework. The patch is currently tracking the 2.4 series and is -targeted for integration into the 2.5 development series. This -technical report provides an overview of the framework and the example -capabilities security module provided by the LSM kernel patch. - - - - -LSM Framework - - -The LSM kernel patch provides a general kernel framework to support -security modules. In particular, the LSM framework is primarily -focused on supporting access control modules, although future -development is likely to address other security needs such as -auditing. By itself, the framework does not provide any additional -security; it merely provides the infrastructure to support security -modules. The LSM kernel patch also moves most of the capabilities -logic into an optional security module, with the system defaulting -to the traditional superuser logic. This capabilities module -is discussed further in . - - - -The LSM kernel patch adds security fields to kernel data structures -and inserts calls to hook functions at critical points in the kernel -code to manage the security fields and to perform access control. It -also adds functions for registering and unregistering security -modules, and adds a general security system call -to support new system calls for security-aware applications. - - - -The LSM security fields are simply void* pointers. For -process and program execution security information, security fields -were added to struct task_struct and -struct linux_binprm. For filesystem security -information, a security field was added to -struct super_block. For pipe, file, and socket -security information, security fields were added to -struct inode and -struct file. For packet and network device security -information, security fields were added to -struct sk_buff and -struct net_device. For System V IPC security -information, security fields were added to -struct kern_ipc_perm and -struct msg_msg; additionally, the definitions -for struct msg_msg, struct -msg_queue, and struct -shmid_kernel were moved to header files -(include/linux/msg.h and -include/linux/shm.h as appropriate) to allow -the security modules to use these definitions. - - - -Each LSM hook is a function pointer in a global table, -security_ops. This table is a -security_operations structure as defined by -include/linux/security.h. Detailed documentation -for each hook is included in this header file. At present, this -structure consists of a collection of substructures that group related -hooks based on the kernel object (e.g. task, inode, file, sk_buff, -etc) as well as some top-level hook function pointers for system -operations. This structure is likely to be flattened in the future -for performance. The placement of the hook calls in the kernel code -is described by the "called:" lines in the per-hook documentation in -the header file. The hook calls can also be easily found in the -kernel code by looking for the string "security_ops->". - - - - -Linus mentioned per-process security hooks in his original remarks as a -possible alternative to global security hooks. However, if LSM were -to start from the perspective of per-process hooks, then the base -framework would have to deal with how to handle operations that -involve multiple processes (e.g. kill), since each process might have -its own hook for controlling the operation. This would require a -general mechanism for composing hooks in the base framework. -Additionally, LSM would still need global hooks for operations that -have no process context (e.g. network input operations). -Consequently, LSM provides global security hooks, but a security -module is free to implement per-process hooks (where that makes sense) -by storing a security_ops table in each process' security field and -then invoking these per-process hooks from the global hooks. -The problem of composition is thus deferred to the module. - - - -The global security_ops table is initialized to a set of hook -functions provided by a dummy security module that provides -traditional superuser logic. A register_security -function (in security/security.c) is provided to -allow a security module to set security_ops to refer to its own hook -functions, and an unregister_security function is -provided to revert security_ops to the dummy module hooks. This -mechanism is used to set the primary security module, which is -responsible for making the final decision for each hook. - - - -LSM also provides a simple mechanism for stacking additional security -modules with the primary security module. It defines -register_security and -unregister_security hooks in the -security_operations structure and provides -mod_reg_security and -mod_unreg_security functions that invoke these -hooks after performing some sanity checking. A security module can -call these functions in order to stack with other modules. However, -the actual details of how this stacking is handled are deferred to the -module, which can implement these hooks in any way it wishes -(including always returning an error if it does not wish to support -stacking). In this manner, LSM again defers the problem of -composition to the module. - - - -Although the LSM hooks are organized into substructures based on -kernel object, all of the hooks can be viewed as falling into two -major categories: hooks that are used to manage the security fields -and hooks that are used to perform access control. Examples of the -first category of hooks include the -alloc_security and -free_security hooks defined for each kernel data -structure that has a security field. These hooks are used to allocate -and free security structures for kernel objects. The first category -of hooks also includes hooks that set information in the security -field after allocation, such as the post_lookup -hook in struct inode_security_ops. This hook -is used to set security information for inodes after successful lookup -operations. An example of the second category of hooks is the -permission hook in -struct inode_security_ops. This hook checks -permission when accessing an inode. - - - - -LSM Capabilities Module - - -The LSM kernel patch moves most of the existing POSIX.1e capabilities -logic into an optional security module stored in the file -security/capability.c. This change allows -users who do not want to use capabilities to omit this code entirely -from their kernel, instead using the dummy module for traditional -superuser logic or any other module that they desire. This change -also allows the developers of the capabilities logic to maintain and -enhance their code more freely, without needing to integrate patches -back into the base kernel. - - - -In addition to moving the capabilities logic, the LSM kernel patch -could move the capability-related fields from the kernel data -structures into the new security fields managed by the security -modules. However, at present, the LSM kernel patch leaves the -capability fields in the kernel data structures. In his original -remarks, Linus suggested that this might be preferable so that other -security modules can be easily stacked with the capabilities module -without needing to chain multiple security structures on the security field. -It also avoids imposing extra overhead on the capabilities module -to manage the security fields. However, the LSM framework could -certainly support such a move if it is determined to be desirable, -with only a few additional changes described below. - - - -At present, the capabilities logic for computing process capabilities -on execve and set*uid, -checking capabilities for a particular process, saving and checking -capabilities for netlink messages, and handling the -capget and capset system -calls have been moved into the capabilities module. There are still a -few locations in the base kernel where capability-related fields are -directly examined or modified, but the current version of the LSM -patch does allow a security module to completely replace the -assignment and testing of capabilities. These few locations would -need to be changed if the capability-related fields were moved into -the security field. The following is a list of known locations that -still perform such direct examination or modification of -capability-related fields: - -fs/open.c:sys_access -fs/lockd/host.c:nlm_bind_host -fs/nfsd/auth.c:nfsd_setuser -fs/proc/array.c:task_cap - - - - - -
diff --git a/Documentation/lsm.txt b/Documentation/lsm.txt new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..ad4dfd020e0d --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/lsm.txt @@ -0,0 +1,201 @@ +======================================================== +Linux Security Modules: General Security Hooks for Linux +======================================================== + +:Author: Stephen Smalley +:Author: Timothy Fraser +:Author: Chris Vance + +.. note:: + + The APIs described in this book are outdated. + +Introduction +============ + +In March 2001, the National Security Agency (NSA) gave a presentation +about Security-Enhanced Linux (SELinux) at the 2.5 Linux Kernel Summit. +SELinux is an implementation of flexible and fine-grained +nondiscretionary access controls in the Linux kernel, originally +implemented as its own particular kernel patch. Several other security +projects (e.g. RSBAC, Medusa) have also developed flexible access +control architectures for the Linux kernel, and various projects have +developed particular access control models for Linux (e.g. LIDS, DTE, +SubDomain). Each project has developed and maintained its own kernel +patch to support its security needs. + +In response to the NSA presentation, Linus Torvalds made a set of +remarks that described a security framework he would be willing to +consider for inclusion in the mainstream Linux kernel. He described a +general framework that would provide a set of security hooks to control +operations on kernel objects and a set of opaque security fields in +kernel data structures for maintaining security attributes. This +framework could then be used by loadable kernel modules to implement any +desired model of security. Linus also suggested the possibility of +migrating the Linux capabilities code into such a module. + +The Linux Security Modules (LSM) project was started by WireX to develop +such a framework. LSM is a joint development effort by several security +projects, including Immunix, SELinux, SGI and Janus, and several +individuals, including Greg Kroah-Hartman and James Morris, to develop a +Linux kernel patch that implements this framework. The patch is +currently tracking the 2.4 series and is targeted for integration into +the 2.5 development series. This technical report provides an overview +of the framework and the example capabilities security module provided +by the LSM kernel patch. + +LSM Framework +============= + +The LSM kernel patch provides a general kernel framework to support +security modules. In particular, the LSM framework is primarily focused +on supporting access control modules, although future development is +likely to address other security needs such as auditing. By itself, the +framework does not provide any additional security; it merely provides +the infrastructure to support security modules. The LSM kernel patch +also moves most of the capabilities logic into an optional security +module, with the system defaulting to the traditional superuser logic. +This capabilities module is discussed further in +`LSM Capabilities Module <#cap>`__. + +The LSM kernel patch adds security fields to kernel data structures and +inserts calls to hook functions at critical points in the kernel code to +manage the security fields and to perform access control. It also adds +functions for registering and unregistering security modules, and adds a +general :c:func:`security()` system call to support new system calls +for security-aware applications. + +The LSM security fields are simply ``void*`` pointers. For process and +program execution security information, security fields were added to +:c:type:`struct task_struct ` and +:c:type:`struct linux_binprm `. For filesystem +security information, a security field was added to :c:type:`struct +super_block `. For pipe, file, and socket security +information, security fields were added to :c:type:`struct inode +` and :c:type:`struct file `. For packet and +network device security information, security fields were added to +:c:type:`struct sk_buff ` and :c:type:`struct +net_device `. For System V IPC security information, +security fields were added to :c:type:`struct kern_ipc_perm +` and :c:type:`struct msg_msg +`; additionally, the definitions for :c:type:`struct +msg_msg `, struct msg_queue, and struct shmid_kernel +were moved to header files (``include/linux/msg.h`` and +``include/linux/shm.h`` as appropriate) to allow the security modules to +use these definitions. + +Each LSM hook is a function pointer in a global table, security_ops. +This table is a :c:type:`struct security_operations +` structure as defined by +``include/linux/security.h``. Detailed documentation for each hook is +included in this header file. At present, this structure consists of a +collection of substructures that group related hooks based on the kernel +object (e.g. task, inode, file, sk_buff, etc) as well as some top-level +hook function pointers for system operations. This structure is likely +to be flattened in the future for performance. The placement of the hook +calls in the kernel code is described by the "called:" lines in the +per-hook documentation in the header file. The hook calls can also be +easily found in the kernel code by looking for the string +"security_ops->". + +Linus mentioned per-process security hooks in his original remarks as a +possible alternative to global security hooks. However, if LSM were to +start from the perspective of per-process hooks, then the base framework +would have to deal with how to handle operations that involve multiple +processes (e.g. kill), since each process might have its own hook for +controlling the operation. This would require a general mechanism for +composing hooks in the base framework. Additionally, LSM would still +need global hooks for operations that have no process context (e.g. +network input operations). Consequently, LSM provides global security +hooks, but a security module is free to implement per-process hooks +(where that makes sense) by storing a security_ops table in each +process' security field and then invoking these per-process hooks from +the global hooks. The problem of composition is thus deferred to the +module. + +The global security_ops table is initialized to a set of hook functions +provided by a dummy security module that provides traditional superuser +logic. A :c:func:`register_security()` function (in +``security/security.c``) is provided to allow a security module to set +security_ops to refer to its own hook functions, and an +:c:func:`unregister_security()` function is provided to revert +security_ops to the dummy module hooks. This mechanism is used to set +the primary security module, which is responsible for making the final +decision for each hook. + +LSM also provides a simple mechanism for stacking additional security +modules with the primary security module. It defines +:c:func:`register_security()` and +:c:func:`unregister_security()` hooks in the :c:type:`struct +security_operations ` structure and +provides :c:func:`mod_reg_security()` and +:c:func:`mod_unreg_security()` functions that invoke these hooks +after performing some sanity checking. A security module can call these +functions in order to stack with other modules. However, the actual +details of how this stacking is handled are deferred to the module, +which can implement these hooks in any way it wishes (including always +returning an error if it does not wish to support stacking). In this +manner, LSM again defers the problem of composition to the module. + +Although the LSM hooks are organized into substructures based on kernel +object, all of the hooks can be viewed as falling into two major +categories: hooks that are used to manage the security fields and hooks +that are used to perform access control. Examples of the first category +of hooks include the :c:func:`alloc_security()` and +:c:func:`free_security()` hooks defined for each kernel data +structure that has a security field. These hooks are used to allocate +and free security structures for kernel objects. The first category of +hooks also includes hooks that set information in the security field +after allocation, such as the :c:func:`post_lookup()` hook in +:c:type:`struct inode_security_ops `. +This hook is used to set security information for inodes after +successful lookup operations. An example of the second category of hooks +is the :c:func:`permission()` hook in :c:type:`struct +inode_security_ops `. This hook checks +permission when accessing an inode. + +LSM Capabilities Module +======================= + +The LSM kernel patch moves most of the existing POSIX.1e capabilities +logic into an optional security module stored in the file +``security/capability.c``. This change allows users who do not want to +use capabilities to omit this code entirely from their kernel, instead +using the dummy module for traditional superuser logic or any other +module that they desire. This change also allows the developers of the +capabilities logic to maintain and enhance their code more freely, +without needing to integrate patches back into the base kernel. + +In addition to moving the capabilities logic, the LSM kernel patch could +move the capability-related fields from the kernel data structures into +the new security fields managed by the security modules. However, at +present, the LSM kernel patch leaves the capability fields in the kernel +data structures. In his original remarks, Linus suggested that this +might be preferable so that other security modules can be easily stacked +with the capabilities module without needing to chain multiple security +structures on the security field. It also avoids imposing extra overhead +on the capabilities module to manage the security fields. However, the +LSM framework could certainly support such a move if it is determined to +be desirable, with only a few additional changes described below. + +At present, the capabilities logic for computing process capabilities on +:c:func:`execve()` and :c:func:`set\*uid()`, checking +capabilities for a particular process, saving and checking capabilities +for netlink messages, and handling the :c:func:`capget()` and +:c:func:`capset()` system calls have been moved into the +capabilities module. There are still a few locations in the base kernel +where capability-related fields are directly examined or modified, but +the current version of the LSM patch does allow a security module to +completely replace the assignment and testing of capabilities. These few +locations would need to be changed if the capability-related fields were +moved into the security field. The following is a list of known +locations that still perform such direct examination or modification of +capability-related fields: + +- ``fs/open.c``::c:func:`sys_access()` + +- ``fs/lockd/host.c``::c:func:`nlm_bind_host()` + +- ``fs/nfsd/auth.c``::c:func:`nfsd_setuser()` + +- ``fs/proc/array.c``::c:func:`task_cap()`