redonkable
/
remarkable-linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Releases Activity

crypto: arm64/sha256 - increase cra_priority of scalar implementations 

Commit b73b7ac0a7 ("crypto: sha256_generic - add cra_priority") gave
sha256-generic and sha224-generic a cra_priority of 100, to match the
convention for generic implementations.  But sha256-arm64 and
sha224-arm64 also have priority 100, so their order relative to the
generic implementations became ambiguous.

Therefore, increase their priority to 125 so that they have higher
priority than the generic implementations but lower priority than the
NEON implementations which have priority 150.

Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
zero-colors
Eric Biggers 2018-07-17 10:09:26 -07:00 committed by Herbert Xu
parent faa16bc404
commit 6b0daa7820
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
arch/arm64/crypto/sha256-glue.c
View File

@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ static struct shash_alg algs[] = { {
.descsize = sizeof(struct sha256_state),
.base.cra_name = "sha256",
.base.cra_driver_name = "sha256-arm64",
.base.cra_priority = 100,
.base.cra_priority = 125,
.base.cra_blocksize = SHA256_BLOCK_SIZE,
.base.cra_module = THIS_MODULE,
}, {
@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ static struct shash_alg algs[] = { {
.descsize = sizeof(struct sha256_state),
.base.cra_name = "sha224",
.base.cra_driver_name = "sha224-arm64",
.base.cra_priority = 100,
.base.cra_priority = 125,
.base.cra_blocksize = SHA224_BLOCK_SIZE,
.base.cra_module = THIS_MODULE,
} };