redonkable
/
remarkable-linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Releases Activity

Btrfs: use FLUSH_LIMIT for relocation in reserve_metadata_bytes 

We used to allow you to set FLUSH_ALL and then just wouldn't do things like
commit transactions or wait on ordered extents if we noticed you were in a
transaction.  However now that all the flushing for FLUSH_ALL is asynchronous
we've lost the ability to tell, and we could end up deadlocking.  So instead use
FLUSH_LIMIT in reserve_metadata_bytes in relocation and then return -EAGAIN if
we error out to preserve the previous behavior.  I've also added an ASSERT() to
catch anybody else who tries to do this.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
steinar/wifi_calib_4_9_kernel
Josef Bacik 2016-05-27 13:24:13 -04:00 committed by David Sterba
parent ac2fabac42
commit 8ca17f0f59
2 changed files with 22 additions and 17 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
View File

@ -5135,6 +5135,8 @@ static int __reserve_metadata_bytes(struct btrfs_root *root,
int ret = 0;
ASSERT(orig_bytes);
ASSERT(!current->journal_info || flush != BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_ALL);
spin_lock(&space_info->lock);
ret = -ENOSPC;
used = space_info->bytes_used + space_info->bytes_reserved +

37
fs/btrfs/relocation.c
View File

@ -2604,25 +2604,28 @@ static int reserve_metadata_space(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
trans->block_rsv = rc->block_rsv;
rc->reserved_bytes += num_bytes;
/*
* We are under a transaction here so we can only do limited flushing.
* If we get an enospc just kick back -EAGAIN so we know to drop the
* transaction and try to refill when we can flush all the things.
*/
ret = btrfs_block_rsv_refill(root, rc->block_rsv, num_bytes,
BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_ALL);
BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_LIMIT);
if (ret) {
if (ret == -EAGAIN) {
tmp = rc->extent_root->nodesize *
RELOCATION_RESERVED_NODES;
while (tmp <= rc->reserved_bytes)
tmp <<= 1;
/*
* only one thread can access block_rsv at this point,
* so we don't need hold lock to protect block_rsv.
* we expand more reservation size here to allow enough
* space for relocation and we will return earlier in
* enospc case.
*/
rc->block_rsv->size = tmp + rc->extent_root->nodesize *
RELOCATION_RESERVED_NODES;
}
return ret;
tmp = rc->extent_root->nodesize * RELOCATION_RESERVED_NODES;
while (tmp <= rc->reserved_bytes)
tmp <<= 1;
/*
* only one thread can access block_rsv at this point,
* so we don't need hold lock to protect block_rsv.
* we expand more reservation size here to allow enough
* space for relocation and we will return eailer in
* enospc case.
*/
rc->block_rsv->size = tmp + rc->extent_root->nodesize *
RELOCATION_RESERVED_NODES;
return -EAGAIN;
}
return 0;