redonkable/remarkable-linux
redonkable/remarkable-linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Releases Activity

revert "memcg: track all children over limit in the root"

Browse source 
Revert commit 1be171d60b ("memcg: track all children over limit in the
root")

I merged this prematurely - Michal and Johannes still disagree about the
overall design direction and the future remains unclear.

Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Andrew Morton 2013-09-24 15:27:34 -07:00 committed by Linus Torvalds
parent 20ba27f52e
commit 8f939a9f4c
1 changed files with 0 additions and 9 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

9
mm/memcontrol.c
View file

@ -851,15 +851,9 @@ static void mem_cgroup_update_soft_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
/*
* Necessary to update all ancestors when hierarchy is used
* because their event counter is not touched.
* We track children even outside the hierarchy for the root
* cgroup because tree walk starting at root should visit
* all cgroups and we want to prevent from pointless tree
* walk if no children is below the limit.
*/
while (delta && (parent = parent_mem_cgroup(parent)))
atomic_add(delta, &parent->children_in_excess);
if (memcg != root_mem_cgroup && !root_mem_cgroup->use_hierarchy)
atomic_add(delta, &root_mem_cgroup->children_in_excess);
spin_unlock(&memcg->soft_lock);
}
@ -6112,9 +6106,6 @@ static void mem_cgroup_css_offline(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
if (memcg->soft_contributed) {
while ((memcg = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg)))
atomic_dec(&memcg->children_in_excess);
if (memcg != root_mem_cgroup && !root_mem_cgroup->use_hierarchy)
atomic_dec(&root_mem_cgroup->children_in_excess);
}
mem_cgroup_destroy_all_caches(memcg);
vmpressure_cleanup(&memcg->vmpressure);