redonkable
/
remarkable-linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Releases Activity

xfrm: Fix stack-out-of-bounds with misconfigured transport mode policies. 

[ Upstream commit 732706afe1 ]

On policies with a transport mode template, we pass the addresses
from the flowi to xfrm_state_find(), assuming that the IP addresses
(and address family) don't change during transformation.

Unfortunately our policy template validation is not strict enough.
It is possible to configure policies with transport mode template
where the address family of the template does not match the selectors
address family. This lead to stack-out-of-bound reads because
we compare arddesses of the wrong family. Fix this by refusing
such a configuration, address family can not change on transport
mode.

We use the assumption that, on transport mode, the first templates
address family must match the address family of the policy selector.
Subsequent transport mode templates must mach the address family of
the previous template.

Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
steinar/wifi_calib_4_9_kernel
Steffen Klassert 2017-12-08 08:07:25 +01:00 committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent 5ae4f52803
commit 9a54c51001
1 changed files with 9 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

9
net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
View File

@ -1380,11 +1380,14 @@ static void copy_templates(struct xfrm_policy *xp, struct xfrm_user_tmpl *ut,
static int validate_tmpl(int nr, struct xfrm_user_tmpl *ut, u16 family)
{
u16 prev_family;
int i;
if (nr > XFRM_MAX_DEPTH)
return -EINVAL;
prev_family = family;
for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
/* We never validated the ut->family value, so many
* applications simply leave it at zero. The check was
@ -1396,6 +1399,12 @@ static int validate_tmpl(int nr, struct xfrm_user_tmpl *ut, u16 family)
if (!ut[i].family)
ut[i].family = family;
if ((ut[i].mode == XFRM_MODE_TRANSPORT) &&
(ut[i].family != prev_family))
return -EINVAL;
prev_family = ut[i].family;
switch (ut[i].family) {
case AF_INET:
break;