security/ima: replace gcc specific __FUNCTION__ with __func__
As noted by checkpatch.pl, __func__ should be used instead of gcc specific __FUNCTION__. Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
512ea3bc30
commit
a19c5bbefb
|
@ -79,17 +79,17 @@ void iint_free(struct kref *kref)
|
||||||
iint->version = 0;
|
iint->version = 0;
|
||||||
iint->flags = 0UL;
|
iint->flags = 0UL;
|
||||||
if (iint->readcount != 0) {
|
if (iint->readcount != 0) {
|
||||||
printk(KERN_INFO "%s: readcount: %ld\n", __FUNCTION__,
|
printk(KERN_INFO "%s: readcount: %ld\n", __func__,
|
||||||
iint->readcount);
|
iint->readcount);
|
||||||
iint->readcount = 0;
|
iint->readcount = 0;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
if (iint->writecount != 0) {
|
if (iint->writecount != 0) {
|
||||||
printk(KERN_INFO "%s: writecount: %ld\n", __FUNCTION__,
|
printk(KERN_INFO "%s: writecount: %ld\n", __func__,
|
||||||
iint->writecount);
|
iint->writecount);
|
||||||
iint->writecount = 0;
|
iint->writecount = 0;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
if (iint->opencount != 0) {
|
if (iint->opencount != 0) {
|
||||||
printk(KERN_INFO "%s: opencount: %ld\n", __FUNCTION__,
|
printk(KERN_INFO "%s: opencount: %ld\n", __func__,
|
||||||
iint->opencount);
|
iint->opencount);
|
||||||
iint->opencount = 0;
|
iint->opencount = 0;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ static void ima_dec_counts(struct ima_iint_cache *iint, struct inode *inode,
|
||||||
(iint->writecount < 0)) &&
|
(iint->writecount < 0)) &&
|
||||||
!ima_limit_imbalance(file)) {
|
!ima_limit_imbalance(file)) {
|
||||||
printk(KERN_INFO "%s: open/free imbalance (r:%ld w:%ld o:%ld)\n",
|
printk(KERN_INFO "%s: open/free imbalance (r:%ld w:%ld o:%ld)\n",
|
||||||
__FUNCTION__, iint->readcount, iint->writecount,
|
__func__, iint->readcount, iint->writecount,
|
||||||
iint->opencount);
|
iint->opencount);
|
||||||
dump_stack();
|
dump_stack();
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue