lockdep: Remove recursion stattistics
Since lockdep has introduced BFS to avoid recursion, statistics for recursion does not make any sense now. So remove them. Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl LKML-Reference: <1251542879-5211-1-git-send-email-tom.leiming@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
parent
96004bb2a1
commit
a417887637
|
@ -399,7 +399,6 @@ unsigned int nr_hardirq_chains;
|
||||||
unsigned int nr_softirq_chains;
|
unsigned int nr_softirq_chains;
|
||||||
unsigned int nr_process_chains;
|
unsigned int nr_process_chains;
|
||||||
unsigned int max_lockdep_depth;
|
unsigned int max_lockdep_depth;
|
||||||
unsigned int max_recursion_depth;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP
|
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP
|
||||||
/*
|
/*
|
||||||
|
@ -429,11 +428,8 @@ atomic_t redundant_softirqs_on;
|
||||||
atomic_t redundant_softirqs_off;
|
atomic_t redundant_softirqs_off;
|
||||||
atomic_t nr_unused_locks;
|
atomic_t nr_unused_locks;
|
||||||
atomic_t nr_cyclic_checks;
|
atomic_t nr_cyclic_checks;
|
||||||
atomic_t nr_cyclic_check_recursions;
|
|
||||||
atomic_t nr_find_usage_forwards_checks;
|
atomic_t nr_find_usage_forwards_checks;
|
||||||
atomic_t nr_find_usage_forwards_recursions;
|
|
||||||
atomic_t nr_find_usage_backwards_checks;
|
atomic_t nr_find_usage_backwards_checks;
|
||||||
atomic_t nr_find_usage_backwards_recursions;
|
|
||||||
#endif
|
#endif
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/*
|
/*
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -199,16 +199,10 @@ static void lockdep_stats_debug_show(struct seq_file *m)
|
||||||
debug_atomic_read(&chain_lookup_hits));
|
debug_atomic_read(&chain_lookup_hits));
|
||||||
seq_printf(m, " cyclic checks: %11u\n",
|
seq_printf(m, " cyclic checks: %11u\n",
|
||||||
debug_atomic_read(&nr_cyclic_checks));
|
debug_atomic_read(&nr_cyclic_checks));
|
||||||
seq_printf(m, " cyclic-check recursions: %11u\n",
|
|
||||||
debug_atomic_read(&nr_cyclic_check_recursions));
|
|
||||||
seq_printf(m, " find-mask forwards checks: %11u\n",
|
seq_printf(m, " find-mask forwards checks: %11u\n",
|
||||||
debug_atomic_read(&nr_find_usage_forwards_checks));
|
debug_atomic_read(&nr_find_usage_forwards_checks));
|
||||||
seq_printf(m, " find-mask forwards recursions: %11u\n",
|
|
||||||
debug_atomic_read(&nr_find_usage_forwards_recursions));
|
|
||||||
seq_printf(m, " find-mask backwards checks: %11u\n",
|
seq_printf(m, " find-mask backwards checks: %11u\n",
|
||||||
debug_atomic_read(&nr_find_usage_backwards_checks));
|
debug_atomic_read(&nr_find_usage_backwards_checks));
|
||||||
seq_printf(m, " find-mask backwards recursions:%11u\n",
|
|
||||||
debug_atomic_read(&nr_find_usage_backwards_recursions));
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
seq_printf(m, " hardirq on events: %11u\n", hi1);
|
seq_printf(m, " hardirq on events: %11u\n", hi1);
|
||||||
seq_printf(m, " hardirq off events: %11u\n", hi2);
|
seq_printf(m, " hardirq off events: %11u\n", hi2);
|
||||||
|
@ -350,8 +344,6 @@ static int lockdep_stats_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
|
||||||
nr_unused);
|
nr_unused);
|
||||||
seq_printf(m, " max locking depth: %11u\n",
|
seq_printf(m, " max locking depth: %11u\n",
|
||||||
max_lockdep_depth);
|
max_lockdep_depth);
|
||||||
seq_printf(m, " max recursion depth: %11u\n",
|
|
||||||
max_recursion_depth);
|
|
||||||
#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
|
#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
|
||||||
seq_printf(m, " max bfs queue depth: %11u\n",
|
seq_printf(m, " max bfs queue depth: %11u\n",
|
||||||
max_bfs_queue_depth);
|
max_bfs_queue_depth);
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue