Revert "scsi: use device_remove_file_self() instead of device_schedule_callback()"

This reverts commit de1dee7820.

Tejun writes:
        I'm sorry but can you please revert the whole series?
        get_active() waiting while a node is deactivated has potential
        to lead to deadlock and that deactivate/reactivate interface is
        something fundamentally flawed and that cgroup will have to work
        with the remove_self() like everybody else.  IOW, I think the
        first posting was correct.

Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@parallels.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Greg Kroah-Hartman 2014-01-13 14:01:46 -08:00
parent ff483d55ba
commit c41d966325

View file

@ -635,12 +635,23 @@ store_rescan_field (struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
}
static DEVICE_ATTR(rescan, S_IWUSR, NULL, store_rescan_field);
static void sdev_store_delete_callback(struct device *dev)
{
scsi_remove_device(to_scsi_device(dev));
}
static ssize_t
sdev_store_delete(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
const char *buf, size_t count)
{
if (device_remove_file_self(dev, attr))
scsi_remove_device(to_scsi_device(dev));
int rc;
/* An attribute cannot be unregistered by one of its own methods,
* so we have to use this roundabout approach.
*/
rc = device_schedule_callback(dev, sdev_store_delete_callback);
if (rc)
count = rc;
return count;
};
static DEVICE_ATTR(delete, S_IWUSR, NULL, sdev_store_delete);