redonkable
/
remarkable-linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Releases Activity

apparmor: relax the restrictions on setting rlimits 

Instead of limiting the setting of the processes limits to current,
relax this to tasks confined by the same profile, as the apparmor
controls for rlimits are at a profile level granularity.

Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Steve Beattie <sbeattie@ubuntu.com>
wifi-calibration
John Johansen 2013-02-18 16:07:34 -08:00
parent 4b7c331fc2
commit cf47aede3b
1 changed files with 12 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

15
security/apparmor/resource.c
View File

@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
#include <linux/audit.h>
#include "include/audit.h"
#include "include/context.h"
#include "include/resource.h"
#include "include/policy.h"
@ -90,17 +91,25 @@ int aa_map_resource(int resource)
int aa_task_setrlimit(struct aa_profile *profile, struct task_struct *task,
unsigned int resource, struct rlimit *new_rlim)
{
struct aa_profile *task_profile;
int error = 0;
rcu_read_lock();
task_profile = aa_get_profile(aa_cred_profile(__task_cred(task)));
rcu_read_unlock();
/* TODO: extend resource control to handle other (non current)
* processes. AppArmor rules currently have the implicit assumption
* that the task is setting the resource of the current process
* profiles. AppArmor rules currently have the implicit assumption
* that the task is setting the resource of a task confined with
* the same profile.
*/
if ((task != current->group_leader) ||
if (profile != task_profile ||
(profile->rlimits.mask & (1 << resource) &&
new_rlim->rlim_max > profile->rlimits.limits[resource].rlim_max))
error = -EACCES;
aa_put_profile(task_profile);
return audit_resource(profile, resource, new_rlim->rlim_max, error);
}