redonkable
/
remarkable-linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Releases Activity

PM / QoS: correct the valid range of pm_qos_class 

The valid start index for pm_qos_array is not 0, but
PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY. There is a null_pm_qos at index 0 of
pm_qos_array.  However, null_pm_qos is not created as misc device so
that inclusion of 0 index for checking pm_qos_class especially for
file operations is not proper here.

[rjw: Changelog, a bit]
Signed-off-by: Sahara <keun-o.park@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
wifi-calibration
Sahara 2013-06-20 11:33:57 +09:00 committed by Rafael J. Wysocki
parent 9350de06be
commit d24c2a4f91
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
kernel/power/qos.c
View File

@ -477,7 +477,7 @@ static int find_pm_qos_object_by_minor(int minor)
{
int pm_qos_class;
for (pm_qos_class = 0;
for (pm_qos_class = PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY;
pm_qos_class < PM_QOS_NUM_CLASSES; pm_qos_class++) {
if (minor ==
pm_qos_array[pm_qos_class]->pm_qos_power_miscdev.minor)
@ -491,7 +491,7 @@ static int pm_qos_power_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
long pm_qos_class;
pm_qos_class = find_pm_qos_object_by_minor(iminor(inode));
if (pm_qos_class >= 0) {
if (pm_qos_class >= PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY) {
struct pm_qos_request *req = kzalloc(sizeof(*req), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!req)
return -ENOMEM;
@ -584,7 +584,7 @@ static int __init pm_qos_power_init(void)
BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(pm_qos_array) != PM_QOS_NUM_CLASSES);
for (i = 1; i < PM_QOS_NUM_CLASSES; i++) {
for (i = PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY; i < PM_QOS_NUM_CLASSES; i++) {
ret = register_pm_qos_misc(pm_qos_array[i]);
if (ret < 0) {
printk(KERN_ERR "pm_qos_param: %s setup failed\n",