smc911x: test after postfix decrement fails in smc911x_{reset,drop_pkt}

When timeout reaches 0 the postfix decrement still subtracts, so the test
fails.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes]
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <12o3l@tiscali.nl>
Acked-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Roel Kluin 2008-04-18 13:50:48 -07:00 committed by Jeff Garzik
parent 72abb46101
commit db2961c5a1

View file

@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ static void smc911x_reset(struct net_device *dev)
do {
udelay(10);
reg = SMC_GET_PMT_CTRL() & PMT_CTRL_READY_;
} while ( timeout-- && !reg);
} while (--timeout && !reg);
if (timeout == 0) {
PRINTK("%s: smc911x_reset timeout waiting for PM restore\n", dev->name);
return;
@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ static void smc911x_reset(struct net_device *dev)
resets++;
break;
}
} while ( timeout-- && (reg & HW_CFG_SRST_));
} while (--timeout && (reg & HW_CFG_SRST_));
}
if (timeout == 0) {
PRINTK("%s: smc911x_reset timeout waiting for reset\n", dev->name);
@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ static inline void smc911x_drop_pkt(struct net_device *dev)
do {
udelay(10);
reg = SMC_GET_RX_DP_CTRL() & RX_DP_CTRL_FFWD_BUSY_;
} while ( timeout-- && reg);
} while (--timeout && reg);
if (timeout == 0) {
PRINTK("%s: timeout waiting for RX fast forward\n", dev->name);
}