net: bpf_jit: fix BPF_S_LDX_B_MSH compilation

Matt Evans spotted that x86 bpf_jit was incorrectly handling negative
constant offsets in BPF_S_LDX_B_MSH instruction.

We need to abort JIT compilation like we do in common_load so that
filter uses the interpreter code and can call __load_pointer()

Reference: http://lists.openwall.net/netdev/2011/07/19/11

Thanks to Indan Zupancic to bring back this issue.

Reported-by: Matt Evans <matt@ozlabs.org>
Reported-by: Indan Zupancic <indan@nul.nu>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
Eric Dumazet 2012-03-18 02:40:48 +00:00 committed by David S. Miller
parent 3af79302b4
commit dc72d99dab

View file

@ -475,8 +475,10 @@ void bpf_jit_compile(struct sk_filter *fp)
case BPF_S_LD_W_ABS:
func = sk_load_word;
common_load: seen |= SEEN_DATAREF;
if ((int)K < 0)
if ((int)K < 0) {
/* Abort the JIT because __load_pointer() is needed. */
goto out;
}
t_offset = func - (image + addrs[i]);
EMIT1_off32(0xbe, K); /* mov imm32,%esi */
EMIT1_off32(0xe8, t_offset); /* call */
@ -489,14 +491,8 @@ common_load: seen |= SEEN_DATAREF;
goto common_load;
case BPF_S_LDX_B_MSH:
if ((int)K < 0) {
if (pc_ret0 > 0) {
/* addrs[pc_ret0 - 1] is the start address */
EMIT_JMP(addrs[pc_ret0 - 1] - addrs[i]);
break;
}
CLEAR_A();
EMIT_JMP(cleanup_addr - addrs[i]);
break;
/* Abort the JIT because __load_pointer() is needed. */
goto out;
}
seen |= SEEN_DATAREF | SEEN_XREG;
t_offset = sk_load_byte_msh - (image + addrs[i]);